Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- International law (7)
- Executive branch (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Executive power (2)
-
- Foreign affairs (2)
- Foreign relations (2)
- Formalist (2)
- Functionalist (2)
- National security (2)
- Access to information (1)
- Armed conflict (1)
- Authority (1)
- Chief Justice Roberts (1)
- Child soldiers (1)
- Children (1)
- Colonialism (1)
- Compliance (1)
- Customary international law (1)
- Delegation (1)
- Domestication (1)
- Hugo Grotius (1)
- Human rights (1)
- IFLA (1)
- International Court of Justice (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
- International agreements (1)
- International tribunals (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Israel (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Methodology And Misdirection: Custom And The Icj, Harlan G. Cohen
Methodology And Misdirection: Custom And The Icj, Harlan G. Cohen
Popular Media
Associate Professor Harlan G. Cohen published "Methodology and Misdirection: Custom and the ICJ" on the European Journal of International Law's blog EILJ: Talk! on December 1, 2015.
Zivotofsky Ii's Two Visions For Foreign Relations Law, Harlan G. Cohen
Zivotofsky Ii's Two Visions For Foreign Relations Law, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
The five opinions in Zivotofsky v. Kerry – four by the Supreme Court’s Republican-nominated Justices – exposed fault-lines over foreign relations law that have remained hidden in many of the Court’s other cases. This short essay, part of an AJIL Unbound Agora on the case, explores the most notable of these fissures – that between Justice Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion, and Chief Justice Roberts, who dissented. Their disagreement in this case highlights the two Justices’ very different visions of U.S. foreign relations law and reveals the dynamic that has defined the direction of the Court over the last …
The Lyon Declaration On Access To Information And Development, Anne Burnett
The Lyon Declaration On Access To Information And Development, Anne Burnett
Presentations
A large format infographic presenting key facts about the Lyon Declaration and providing details about IFLA.
Formalism And Distrust: Foreign Affairs Law In The Roberts Court, Harlan G. Cohen
Formalism And Distrust: Foreign Affairs Law In The Roberts Court, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
When it comes to foreign relations, the Roberts Court has trust issues. As far as the Court is concerned, everyone — the President, Congress, the lower courts, plaintiffs — has played hard and fast with the rules, taking advantage of the Court’s functionalist approaches to foreign affairs issues. This seems to be the message of the RobertsCourt foreign affairs law jurisprudence.
The Roberts Court has been active in foreign affairs law, deciding cases on the detention and trial of enemy combatants, foreign sovereign immunity, the domestic effect of treaties, the extraterritorial reach of federal statutes, the preemption of state laws, …
Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law Managing Board, 2015-2016, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law Managing Board, 2015-2016, Georgia Journal Of International And Comparative Law
Materials from All Student Organizations
No abstract provided.
The Death Of Deference And The Domestication Of Treaty Law, Harlan G. Cohen
The Death Of Deference And The Domestication Of Treaty Law, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
How much deference do courts give to Executive branch views on treaty interpretation? The Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States tells us that courts “will give great weight to an interpretation made by the executive branch,” and earlier empirical studies suggested that deference to Executive in such cases was robust. But is that still the case? The Supreme Court’s rejection of the Executive’s view in a series of high profile cases including Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, and Bond v. United States should raise some doubts. This short article investigates, …
The Post-Postcolonial Woman Or Child, Diane Marie Amann
The Post-Postcolonial Woman Or Child, Diane Marie Amann
Scholarly Works
This essay is based on remarks given as Distinguished Discussant for the 16th annual Grotius Lecture at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law/Biennial Conference of the International Law Association. The essay examines the international law status of women, on the one hand, and children, on the other, through the contemporary lens of the post-postcolonial world and the historical lens of Hugo Grotius and the colonialist era. In so doing, the essay responds to the principal Grotius Lecture, "Women and Children: The Cutting Edge of International Law," which was delivered by Radhika Coomarswamy, NYU Global Professor …
Formalism And Distrust: Foreign Affairs Law In The Roberts Court,, Harlan G. Cohen
Formalism And Distrust: Foreign Affairs Law In The Roberts Court,, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
When it comes to foreign relations, the Roberts Court has trust issues. As far as the Court is concerned, everyone — the President, Congress, the lower courts, plaintiffs — has played hard and fast with the rules, taking advantage of the Court’s functionalist approaches to foreign affairs issues. This seems to be the message of the Roberts Court foreign affairs law jurisprudence. The Roberts Court has been active in foreign affairs law, deciding cases on the detention and trial of enemy combatants, foreign sovereign immunity, the domestic effect of treaties, the extraterritorial reach of federal statutes, the preemption of state …
Theorizing Precedent In International Law, Harlan G. Cohen
Theorizing Precedent In International Law, Harlan G. Cohen
Scholarly Works
Precedent presents a puzzle for international law. As a matter of doctrine, judicial decisions construing international law are not-in-and-of themselves law. They are not binding on future parties in future cases, even before the same tribunal. And yet, international precedent is everywhere. From international investment to international criminal law to international human rights to international trade, prior decisions are invoked, argued over, and applied as precedents by practitioners and by tribunals.
How and why do certain interpretations of international law take on the weight of precedent, reshaping international law arguments around them, while others do not? This chapter develops a …