Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

Entering The Drm-Free Zone: An Intellectual Property And Antitrust Analysis Of The Online Music Industry., Monika Roth Dec 2007

Entering The Drm-Free Zone: An Intellectual Property And Antitrust Analysis Of The Online Music Industry., Monika Roth

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Submission: Draft Guidelines On The Infringement Notices And Forfeiture Of Infringing Copies And Devices Scheme, Copyright Amendment Regulations 2006, Kimberlee G. Weatherall Sep 2007

Submission: Draft Guidelines On The Infringement Notices And Forfeiture Of Infringing Copies And Devices Scheme, Copyright Amendment Regulations 2006, Kimberlee G. Weatherall

Kimberlee G Weatherall

Submission on the Draft Guidelines for the infringement Notices and Forfeiture of Infringing Copies and Devices Scheme produced by the Australian Attorney-General's Department. The submission deals with the scope of the scheme, the need for more case studies, issues of forfeiture, multiple offences, record-keeping, the appropriate individuals against whom notices should be issued, defences, factors relevant to the exercise of officers' discretion or the withdrawal of notices, and the standard of information provided to the public.


Survey Of The Federal Circuit's Patent Law Decisions In 2006: A New Chapter In The Ongoing Dialogue With The Supreme Court, Gregory A. Castanias, Lawrence D. Rosenberg, Michael S. Fried, Todd R. Geremia Jan 2007

Survey Of The Federal Circuit's Patent Law Decisions In 2006: A New Chapter In The Ongoing Dialogue With The Supreme Court, Gregory A. Castanias, Lawrence D. Rosenberg, Michael S. Fried, Todd R. Geremia

American University Law Review

In 2006, the Federal Circuit decided only one portion of one patent case en banc, and that was done mainly as a procedural matter (the entire case was not argued to an en banc court) in order to reconcile prior conflicting precedent on the issue of induced patent infringement with the recent Supreme Court decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., involving induced copyright infringement. But in light of the Supreme Court’s much more muscular review of the Federal Circuit’s patent cases—which may not even reflect the full extent of the Court’s interest in the Federal Circuit’s patent decisions—the …


Copyright And Youtube: Pirate's Playground Or Fair Use Forum?, Kurt Hunt Jan 2007

Copyright And Youtube: Pirate's Playground Or Fair Use Forum?, Kurt Hunt

Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review

The entertainment industry has a history of framing new technology as piracy that threatens its very existence, regardless of the potential benefits of the technology or the legal limits of copyright rights. In the case of YouTube, copyright owners' attempts to retain content control negatively impact the public's ability to discuss culture in an online world. This implicates the basic policy behind fair use: to prevent copyright law from "stifl[ing] the very creativity which that law is designed to foster." The internet has become a powerful medium for expression. It is a vital tool in today's world for sharing original …


Social Networking Web Sites And The Dmca: A Safe-Harbor From Copyright Infringement Liability Or The Perfect Storm?, Jonathan J. Darrow, Gerald R. Ferrera Jan 2007

Social Networking Web Sites And The Dmca: A Safe-Harbor From Copyright Infringement Liability Or The Perfect Storm?, Jonathan J. Darrow, Gerald R. Ferrera

Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

No abstract provided.


Mashed Up Videos And Broken Down Copyright: Changing Copyright To Promote The First Amendment Values Of Transformative Video, Andrew S. Long Jan 2007

Mashed Up Videos And Broken Down Copyright: Changing Copyright To Promote The First Amendment Values Of Transformative Video, Andrew S. Long

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.


Lawful Personal Use, Jessica D. Litman Jan 2007

Lawful Personal Use, Jessica D. Litman

Articles

Despite having sued more than 20,000 of its customers,2 the recording industry wants the world to know that it has no complaint with personal use. Copyright lawyers of all stripes agree that copyright includes a free zone in which individuals may make personal use of copyrighted works without legal liability.3 Unlike other nations, though, the United States hasn't drawn the borders of its lawful personal use zone by statute.4 Determining the circumstances under which personal use of copyrighted works will be deemed lawful is essentially a matter of inference and analogy, and differently striped copyright lawyers will differ vehemently on …


Friend Or Fiend? A "Fair Use" Analysis Of Audioblogs, Carson Blythe Morris Jan 2007

Friend Or Fiend? A "Fair Use" Analysis Of Audioblogs, Carson Blythe Morris

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.