Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
The (Unnoticed) Revitalization Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, 95 St. John's L. Rev. 65 (2021), Daryl Lim
The (Unnoticed) Revitalization Of The Doctrine Of Equivalents, 95 St. John's L. Rev. 65 (2021), Daryl Lim
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Former Chief Judge Paul Michel’S Keynote Address At The 64th Annual Intellectual Property Conference At The Uic John Marshall Law School — The Arc Of American Patent Law: Balance And Rebalance And Rebalance Intellectual Property Policy, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 102 (2021), Paul Michel
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Automated Trade Secret Asset Management: Sfp Classification, Eona Proofs, Blockchaining, And Dtsa Civil Seizure Orders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 145 (2021), R. Mark Halligan
Automated Trade Secret Asset Management: Sfp Classification, Eona Proofs, Blockchaining, And Dtsa Civil Seizure Orders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 145 (2021), R. Mark Halligan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
This Is Fisa Calling To Let You Know You May Be Eligible For A Motion To Suppress: New Notice Requirement From United States V. Moalin, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2021), Jennifer Armstrong
This Is Fisa Calling To Let You Know You May Be Eligible For A Motion To Suppress: New Notice Requirement From United States V. Moalin, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 166 (2021), Jennifer Armstrong
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Filtering Innovation Wheat From Chaff: Quick Citations As Indicators Of Patented Invention Value, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 202 (2021), Richard Gruner
Filtering Innovation Wheat From Chaff: Quick Citations As Indicators Of Patented Invention Value, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 202 (2021), Richard Gruner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Trademark Law After Uspto V. Booking.Com: “Generic.Com” Takeover, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 182 (2021), Paige Miller
Trademark Law After Uspto V. Booking.Com: “Generic.Com” Takeover, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 182 (2021), Paige Miller
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Is Gray V. Perry The One That Got Away? The Idea-Expression Dichotomy And Music Copyright Infringement, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 290 (2021), Marisa Schutz
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Scope Of Employment Test Under The Work-Made-For-Hire Doctrine Revisited: How Covid-19, Remote Working, And The Restatement (Third) Of Agency Could Change It, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 232 (2021), Diana Simon
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Carpenter V. United States: Step Forward For Smartphones And Their Data, But Maybe Not For Other Technologies, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 308 (2021), Stephen Bartholomew
Carpenter V. United States: Step Forward For Smartphones And Their Data, But Maybe Not For Other Technologies, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 308 (2021), Stephen Bartholomew
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Proposal For A More Objective Method In Determining The Extent Of Similarities Between Musical Works For The Purpose Of Probative Copying, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 251 (2021), Rachael Belensz
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Immunex V. Sandoz: Drafting Assignments As Licenses To Avoid Obviousness-Type Double Patenting, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 412 (2021), Michael Mand
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Federal Circuit’S Unconventionality Approach To Patent-Ineligibility Challenges In A Motion To Dismiss, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
Federal Circuit’S Unconventionality Approach To Patent-Ineligibility Challenges In A Motion To Dismiss, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 331 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The State Of Trade Secret Protection In China In Light Of The U.S.-China Trade Wars: Trade Secret Protection In China Before And After The U.S.-China Trade Agreement Of January 15, 2020, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 108 (2021), Paolo Beconcini
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
A Retrospective Reflection On Ripl, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 13 (2021), Adam Kelly, Dorien Clark
A Retrospective Reflection On Ripl, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 13 (2021), Adam Kelly, Dorien Clark
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Closing The Patent Loophole Across Borders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 358 (2021), Mattias Rättzén
Closing The Patent Loophole Across Borders, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 358 (2021), Mattias Rättzén
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Replacing The Rogers Test: Will An Inquiry Into Non-Artistic Motive In Selecting Titles Of Expressive Works Remedy The Possibility Of Flagrant Deception?, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 429 (2021), Sabina Nedkova
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Blur Between Fact And Fiction: Should Trademark Protections Extend To Aspects Of Fictional Works?, 20 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 451 (2021), Sam Walker
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Foreword: The Supreme Court’S Changing Approach To Patent Law, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2021), Ted Field
Foreword: The Supreme Court’S Changing Approach To Patent Law, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2021), Ted Field
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Federal Circuit’S Jurisprudence Of The Patent-Eligibility Analysis: Toward A Bright-Line Rule, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 16 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
Federal Circuit’S Jurisprudence Of The Patent-Eligibility Analysis: Toward A Bright-Line Rule, 21 Uic Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 16 (2021), Ping-Hsun Chen
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Saving Substantial Similarity, 73 Fla. L. Rev. 591 (2021), Daryl Lim
Saving Substantial Similarity, 73 Fla. L. Rev. 591 (2021), Daryl Lim
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Substantial similarity, an analysis of the similarity between two works, is the fulcrum of copyright infringement. Recent cases involving Led Zeppelin's signature song “Stairway to Heaven,” the award-winning movie “The Shape of Water,” and Google and Oracle's dispute over computer code all required courts to grapple with this fundamental analysis. This Article reveals that today's copyright plaintiffs have only a one-in-ten chance of winning--the worst in a century--and also discusses the cause of this trend--defendants' devastatingly effective use of pretrial motions and the rise of lawsuits against nonrival defendants. Scholarly debates on substantial similarity typically revolve around the works of …
Substantial Similarity’S Silent Death, 48 Pepp. L. Rev. 713 (2021), Daryl Lim
Substantial Similarity’S Silent Death, 48 Pepp. L. Rev. 713 (2021), Daryl Lim
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Flipping The Dmca And Its Progeny On Their Heads: Content Creators Reclaiming Revenue From Improper Copyright Claims, 54 Uic L. Rev. 757 (2021), Justin Lizalek
Flipping The Dmca And Its Progeny On Their Heads: Content Creators Reclaiming Revenue From Improper Copyright Claims, 54 Uic L. Rev. 757 (2021), Justin Lizalek
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.