Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Patent Bar Gender Gap: Expanding The Eligibility Requirements To Foster Inclusion And Innovation In The U.S. Patent System, Mary T. Hannon Oct 2020

The Patent Bar Gender Gap: Expanding The Eligibility Requirements To Foster Inclusion And Innovation In The U.S. Patent System, Mary T. Hannon

IP Theory

No abstract provided.


Sea Change: The Rising Tide Of Pro Bono Legal Services For The Creative Community, Victoria Phillips Jul 2020

Sea Change: The Rising Tide Of Pro Bono Legal Services For The Creative Community, Victoria Phillips

IP Theory

No abstract provided.


When Standards Collide With Intellectual Property: Teaching About Standard Setting Organizations, Technology, And Microsoft V. Motorola, Cynthia L. Dahl Jul 2020

When Standards Collide With Intellectual Property: Teaching About Standard Setting Organizations, Technology, And Microsoft V. Motorola, Cynthia L. Dahl

IP Theory

No abstract provided.


Artificial Creativity: A Case Against Copyright For Ai-Created Visual Artwork, Megan Svedman Jan 2020

Artificial Creativity: A Case Against Copyright For Ai-Created Visual Artwork, Megan Svedman

IP Theory

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly complex, and provides examples of compelling, human-like performances. One such artificial intelligence technology is known as Creative Adversarial Network (“CAN”) technology, which relies on inputs of preexisting pieces of art to create pieces of original art that pass as human-made. Whether the coders responsible for CAN-technology should be granted coverage for the resultant art remains an open question in United States jurisprudence. This paper seeks to explore why, given both software’s historical legacy in copyright law and bedrock copyright justifications, extending copyright coverage to the coders responsible for CAN technology would be a grave misstep …


Using Ai To Analyze Patent Claim Indefiniteness, Dean Alderucci, Kevin Ashley Jan 2020

Using Ai To Analyze Patent Claim Indefiniteness, Dean Alderucci, Kevin Ashley

IP Theory

We describe how to use artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to partially automate a type of legal analysis, determining whether a patent claim satisfies the definiteness requirement. Although fully automating such a high-level cognitive task is well beyond state-of-the-art AI, we show that AI can nevertheless assist the decision maker in making this determination. Specifically, the use of custom AI technology can aid the decision maker by (1) mining patent text to rapidly bring relevant information to the decision maker’s attention, and (2) suggesting simple inferences that can be drawn from that information.

We begin by summarizing the law related to …


A Production View On Patent Procurement, Ian C. Schick Jan 2020

A Production View On Patent Procurement, Ian C. Schick

IP Theory

When we think of a “production environment,” a law firm patent practice is not usually the first thing that comes to mind. But why not? Patent practices are highly process-oriented, and they certainly involve “manufacturing” work product, primarily in the form of new patent applications and office action responses. This article discusses how, with a production view on patent procurement, exploiting the principles of lean production can be a compelling way to adapt to tough issues presently roiling the patent ecosystem.