Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 26 of 26
Full-Text Articles in Law
“Democratizing” Globalization: Practicing The Policies Of Cultural Inclusion, 10 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 217 (2002), Doris E. Long
“Democratizing” Globalization: Practicing The Policies Of Cultural Inclusion, 10 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 217 (2002), Doris E. Long
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Trade Dress Protection And The Problem Of Distinctiveness, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 225 (2002), Mark V.B. Partridge
Trade Dress Protection And The Problem Of Distinctiveness, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 225 (2002), Mark V.B. Partridge
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The problem of trade dress protection is this: What rules should we apply to trade dress protection to best satisfy the goals of trademark law? The merit of various proposed solutions can be measured by evaluating how effective they are in achieving those goals in various disputes. Both distinctiveness and likelihood of confusion should be understood from the perspective of the relevant public, not from that of the court, the trademark owner or the infringer. The questions we seek to answer only have coherent meaning if we consider the perception of the public. Otherwise, we are unable to determine if …
On Red-Haired Waitresses, Shakespeare, And Product Configuration: A Response To Justice Stevens, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 218 (2002), Kenneth L. Port
On Red-Haired Waitresses, Shakespeare, And Product Configuration: A Response To Justice Stevens, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 218 (2002), Kenneth L. Port
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Justice John Paul Stevens’ Inaugural Lecture in Trademark Law honoring Beverly Pattishall truly is a memorable read. Justice Stevens has provided a clear rationale for the Supreme Court’s most recent line of trade dress cases that most thought impossible. In fact, most have not even thought that there was a rationale, let alone a clear one, to a line of cases where the Court seems to be straining to balance the competing interests in American trademark jurisprudence. Rather than the arbitrary conclusion reached by the Supreme Court in distinguishing product configuration from product packaging, most commentators have recommended a more …
The Three Stages To Successful Appellate Advocacy Before The Federal Circuit, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 238 (2002), Charles W. Shifley
The Three Stages To Successful Appellate Advocacy Before The Federal Circuit, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 238 (2002), Charles W. Shifley
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
To succeed at the CAFC, the advocate must succeed in three stages of appeal. The first stage of appeal is actually the stage of proceedings in the trial court. The trial court proceedings are the first stage of appeal because in the absence of correct advocacy in the trial court, there is no opportunity for appeal. The action in the trial court need not be the success of winning at trial. It must, however, at least be the success of preserving issues for appeal – preserving critical error that cannot be remedied at the trial level. In the second stage …
Section 43(A) Of The Shakespeare Canon Of Statutory Construction: The Beverly W. Pattishall Inaugural Lecture In Trademark Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 179 (2002), John Paul Stevens
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Beverly Pattishall is a name that has secondary meaning for law students, for veteran trial lawyers—especially those seeking a more courteous and collegial bar—and for bar associations at the local, the national, and indeed the international level. It is fitting that a lecture series be dedicated to a quintessential “scholar and gentleman.” The Shakespeare Canon of Statutory Construction, like all of Shakespeare’s plays, contains five parts: Read the statute; read the entire statute; read the statute in its contemporary context; if necessary, consult the legislative history; and, finally, use your common sense. Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act has required …
An Enzo White Paper: A New Judicial Standard For A Biotechnology "Written Description" Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 254 (2002), Harold C. Wegner
An Enzo White Paper: A New Judicial Standard For A Biotechnology "Written Description" Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 254 (2002), Harold C. Wegner
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The April 2, 2002, Federal Circuit opinion in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc., may have the greatest potential impact on a multidimensional basis of any decision from that court in recent years. Far more important than whatever disruption takes place domestically—which may be fixed through Congressional or further judicial action—one must look to the foreign impact of the Enzo opinion. This decision threatens to undermine the patent basis for American protection of biotechnology inventions abroad, once the case is understood and embodied in the several foreign patent laws. Problems with Enzo are not limited to biotechnology. What’s good for …
"Unitorrial" Marks And The Global Economy, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 191 (2002), Doris E. Long
"Unitorrial" Marks And The Global Economy, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 191 (2002), Doris E. Long
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The early decades of the 21st Century may well become known in the annals of intellectual property development as the period when “everything old is new again.” There is one ancient doctrine that has not yet enjoyed a similar renaissance, despite its clear application to today’s new, global, digital economy. It is the old (and currently discredited) view that trademarks and other commercial symbols are universal in nature. First given credence in early US cases regarding the importation of grey market, or parallel imports, the doctrine of universality was gradually replaced by a view of trademarks as creatures of nation …
Research Versus Development: Patent Pooling, Innovation And Standardization In The Software Industry, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 274 (2002), Daniel Lin
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Despite the impressive pace of modern invention, a certain “patent thicket” effect that may be impeding what has become an increasingly difficult road to the commercialization of new technologies. Specifically, as new technologies build upon old technologies, they necessarily become increasingly complex, and as a result, are often subject to the protection of multiple patents, covering both the new cumulative technologies as well as old foundational technologies. The difficulties of acquiring licenses (e.g. hold-out problems) for all such patents has the potential to stifle the development and commercialization of these new technologies. As such, patent pooling, once condemned as facilitating …
A Practical Solution To Claim Construction: Stopgap Measures While Waiting For Reform, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 138 (2002), Stephen L. Sheldon
A Practical Solution To Claim Construction: Stopgap Measures While Waiting For Reform, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 138 (2002), Stephen L. Sheldon
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Mickey Mouse & Sonny Bono Go To Court: The Copyright Term Extension Act And Its Effect On Current And Future Rights, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 95 (2002), Victoria A. Grzelak
Mickey Mouse & Sonny Bono Go To Court: The Copyright Term Extension Act And Its Effect On Current And Future Rights, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 95 (2002), Victoria A. Grzelak
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Genetic Age: Who Owns The Genome?: A Symposium On Intellectual Property And The Human Genome, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 6 (2002), Scott A. Brown, Q. Todd Dickinson, Stephen P.A. Fodor, Justin Gillis, Lee H. Hamilton, Eric S. Lander, Pilar Ossorio
The Genetic Age: Who Owns The Genome?: A Symposium On Intellectual Property And The Human Genome, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 6 (2002), Scott A. Brown, Q. Todd Dickinson, Stephen P.A. Fodor, Justin Gillis, Lee H. Hamilton, Eric S. Lander, Pilar Ossorio
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
A Symposium on Intellectual Property Co-Sponsored by The Woodrow Wilson Center. Featuring the remarks of Scott A. Brown, J.D.; Q. Todd Dickinson, J.D.; Stephen P.A. Fodor, Ph.D.; Justin Gillis; Hon. Lee H. Hamilton; Eric S. Lander, Ph.D.; and Pilar Ossorio, Ph.D., J.D.
Prosecution Laches As A Defense To Infringement: Just In Case There Are Any More Submarines Under Water, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 383 (2002), Gregory F. Sutthiwan
Prosecution Laches As A Defense To Infringement: Just In Case There Are Any More Submarines Under Water, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 383 (2002), Gregory F. Sutthiwan
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The comment examines prosecution history laches as an infringement defense in the context of the pending litigation against the Jerome Lemelson Medical Education & Research Foundation. Jerome Lemelson amassed over five hundred patents during his lifetime. Of these, a few key patents have priority based on initial disclosures over forty years ago. Through multiple continuances however, the patents were not issued until decades later and are thus currently enforceable. Lemelson’s foundation has been aggressively seeking royalties based on these, so called “submarine patents,” against bar-code technology users. This comment discusses the problems posed by “submarine patents” and proposes guidelines for …
Go To Jail - Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Pay Civil Damages: The United States’ Hesitation Towards The International Convention On Cybercrime’S Copyright Provisions, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 364 (2002), Adrienne N. Kitchen
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The problem of combating copyright infringement increases tenfold when considered in light of today’s global and digital environment. As more authors seek copyright protection, others seek to get around it by evading jurisdictional reach. The Council of Europe has developed the world’s first International Convention on Cybercrime, which incorporates harsh substantive copyright provisions but neglects to include effective enforcement protocols. This Comment proposes that the United States not rush to adopt the Council of Europe’s Convention, but rather seek a more definitive and effective solution in a singularly-focused agreement on intellectual property rights in a global economic context.
"Interpretive Necromancy" Or Prudent Patent Policy? The Supreme Court’S “Arising Under” Blunder In Holmes Group V. Vornado, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 57 (2002), Janice M. Mueller
"Interpretive Necromancy" Or Prudent Patent Policy? The Supreme Court’S “Arising Under” Blunder In Holmes Group V. Vornado, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 57 (2002), Janice M. Mueller
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Has The Reasonable Experimentation Doctrine Become Unreasonable?: Rethinking The Reasonable Experimentation Doctrine In Light Of Automated Experimental Techniques, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 116 (2002), Mark H. Hopkins
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Business Method Patents: Are There Any Limits?, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 30 (2002), Bradley C. Wright
Business Method Patents: Are There Any Limits?, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 30 (2002), Bradley C. Wright
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Employee Inventors, The Dual Ladder, And The Useful Arts: From Thomas Paine To The "Dilbert Boycott", 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 310 (2002), Ronald E. Andermann
Employee Inventors, The Dual Ladder, And The Useful Arts: From Thomas Paine To The "Dilbert Boycott", 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 310 (2002), Ronald E. Andermann
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
To address limitations on the promotion of the progress of the useful arts, the Framers provided a Constitutional grant in the Patent Clause. They did so despite Thomas Jefferson’s concerns. However, limitations on the promotion of the useful arts continue today, often in very subtle ways. The evolution of dual-ladder corporate organizations as described in Martens has given rise to one such limitation—the phenomenon identified as the “Dilbert boycott.” Also, financially lucrative markets can give rise to abusive limitations on the promotion of the useful arts as in Synthroid. Combining these limitations with Thomas Jefferson’s fears of even limited monopolies …
The Nexus Requirement And The Fatal Injury: Does An Offer To Sell An Infringing Product Give Rise To A Duty To Defend Under A Cgl?, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 344 (2002), Willard L. Hemsworth Iii
The Nexus Requirement And The Fatal Injury: Does An Offer To Sell An Infringing Product Give Rise To A Duty To Defend Under A Cgl?, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 344 (2002), Willard L. Hemsworth Iii
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Case law in the area of patent infringement has held that patent infringement cannot occur in the course of an insured's advertising activities as a matter of law. In 1996, the United States added “offer to sell” as one of the enumerated offenses of direct patent infringement to 35 U.S.C. §271(a). Since that time, there has been little deviation or fluctuation from the above mentioned principle, especially in litigation where a patentee’s search for insurance coverage from their CGL policies “Adverting Injury” provision. This Comment discusses the necessity of the court system to reexamine the modification to 35 U.S.C. §271(a), …
Federal Intellectual Property Law V. State Sovereignty: Can Congress Win?, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 159 (2002), Himanshu Vyas
Federal Intellectual Property Law V. State Sovereignty: Can Congress Win?, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 159 (2002), Himanshu Vyas
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
Effective Appellate Practice Before The Federal Circuit, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2002), Richard Linn
Effective Appellate Practice Before The Federal Circuit, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2002), Richard Linn
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
Like our sister appellate courts, we are a “court of errors.” We do not re-try cases. Our charge is to review proceedings in the courts and administrative agencies over which we have appellate jurisdiction and to correct errors that affect the outcome of those proceedings. Our ability to do that effectively and efficiently depends in large measure on how well the members of the practicing bar bring the errors to our attention for adjudication. To assist the bar in this task, I make the following observations and offer a few suggestions on what I have learned about effective appellate practice …
An Information Society Approach To Privacy Legislation: How To Enhance Privacy While Maximizing Information Value, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 71 (2002), Dana Beldiman
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
No abstract provided.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: A Review Of The Law And The Court's Interpretation, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2002), Neil A. Benchell
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: A Review Of The Law And The Court's Interpretation, 21 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2002), Neil A. Benchell
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
In this review of the Titles I and II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the author first discusses recent case laws affecting the Act. Then, he analyzes sections of the Act, such as the anti-circumvention provisions, constitutionality of the Act, the ISP safe harbor provision, etc. Within each sectional reviews, the author discusses case laws that exemplify courts' interpretation of the Act. In the end, the author discusses the future of the Act. First, he argues that the Act would be challenged under constitutional grounds. The Framers of the Constitution never intended to grant a perpetual monopoly for copyright …
Free Speech In A Digital Economy: An Analysis Of How Intellectual Property Rights Have Been Elevated At The Expense Of Free Speech, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 109 (2002), Bernard E. Nodzon Jr.
Free Speech In A Digital Economy: An Analysis Of How Intellectual Property Rights Have Been Elevated At The Expense Of Free Speech, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 109 (2002), Bernard E. Nodzon Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crossroads: Modern Contract Dissatisfaction As Applied To Songwriter And Recording Agreements, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 795 (2002), Todd M. Murphy
Crossroads: Modern Contract Dissatisfaction As Applied To Songwriter And Recording Agreements, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 795 (2002), Todd M. Murphy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prospecting Or Cybersquatting: Registering Your Name Before Someone Else Does, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 287 (2002), Benjamin B. Cotton
Prospecting Or Cybersquatting: Registering Your Name Before Someone Else Does, 35 J. Marshall L. Rev. 287 (2002), Benjamin B. Cotton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Jurisdictional Gerrymandering - Responding To Holmes Group V. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002), Molly Mosley-Goren
Jurisdictional Gerrymandering - Responding To Holmes Group V. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1 (2002), Molly Mosley-Goren
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.