Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Williams V. Gaye: Further Blurring The Lines Between Inspiration And Infringement, Alyssa Chavers
Williams V. Gaye: Further Blurring The Lines Between Inspiration And Infringement, Alyssa Chavers
Golden Gate University Law Review
Part I of this Note outlines the factual and procedural history of Williams and discusses the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in its first and second opinions. Part II discusses the historical background of copyright law in the United States, namely the Copyright Act of 1909 and the Copyright Act of 1976. Additionally, this section explains the structure of a music copyright infringement suit, including the elements required to make a successful infringement claim.
Part III argues why courts should presume access in music copyright infringement cases, and subsequently, abandon the inverse-ratio rule. The inverse-ratio rule should be abandoned because people’s access …
Substantial Similarity And Junk Science: Reconstructing The Test Of Copyright Infringement, Robert F. Helfing
Substantial Similarity And Junk Science: Reconstructing The Test Of Copyright Infringement, Robert F. Helfing
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
As the standard of copyright infringement, “substantial similarity” is an ambiguous concept that produces unpredictable decisions often inimical to the purposes of copyright law. This Article explains the deficiencies of infringement tests based upon that standard. It also provides an innovative interpretation of copyright protection and presents a new test of infringement designed to directly determine whether that protection has been violated.
Anything You Can Use, I Can Use Better: Examining The Contours Of Fair Use As An Affirmative Defense For Theatre Artists, Creators, And Producers, Benjamin Reiser
Anything You Can Use, I Can Use Better: Examining The Contours Of Fair Use As An Affirmative Defense For Theatre Artists, Creators, And Producers, Benjamin Reiser
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
Broadway is booming. In a post-Hamilton world, ticket sales and attendance records for the commercial theatre industry continue to break season after season. At the same time (and perhaps not so coincidentally), litigation against theatre artists, creators, and producers has surged, especially in the realm of copyright infringement. Many theatre professionals accused of infringement in recent years have employed the doctrine of fair use—codified at 17 U.S.C. § 107—as an affirmative defense against such claims. This Note explores cases involving theatre professionals in which fair use was examined and contends that they collectively reflect broader historical trends in fair …
Jon Snow Lives! Glenn Dies! When Revealing Plot Twists Constitutes Copyright Infringement, Joel Timmer
Jon Snow Lives! Glenn Dies! When Revealing Plot Twists Constitutes Copyright Infringement, Joel Timmer
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
TV shows frequently rely on plot twists and cliff-hangers to keep viewers engaged and tuned-in for the next episode. To try to keep these plot twists secret, networks and program producers take steps to prevent people from revealing them before the episodes air. Recently, HBO and AMC, the networks that air Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead, respectively, have alleged that these so-called spoilers constitute copyright infringement. However, it does not appear that courts have considered whether posting such spoilers does, in fact, constitute infringement. This Article thus examines that question, which requires considering whether such spoilers constitute fair …
The “Foul” Protection For A Photographer’S Original And Creative Choices In A Photograph: Exploring The Implications Of Rentmeester V. Nike, Inc. On Creativity In Photography, Olivia Lattanza
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.