Law Commons^™

Should All Drugs Be Patentable?: A Comparative Perspective, Cynthia M. Ho

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Although there has been substantial discussion of the proper scope of patentable subject matter in recent years, drugs have been overlooked. This Article begins to address that gap with a comparative perspective. In particular, this Article considers what is permissible under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), as well as how India and Canada have utilized TRIPS flexibilities in different ways to properly reward developers of valuable new drugs, while also considering the social harm of higher prices beyond an initial patent term on drugs.

This Article brings valuable insight into this area at a critical …

The Lisbon Agreement: Why The United States Should Stop Fighting The Geneva Act, Danielle Dudding

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

In May 2015, members of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) held a Diplomatic Conference that resulted in the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications. The Act modified the Lisbon Agreement (originally created in 1958), extending its previous protection of appellations of origin to geographical indications as well. The United States, which remains a non-party to the Lisbon Agreement, has been adamantly against the expansion of the Agreement to geographical indications. This Note explores the issues surrounding the Geneva Act, the state of the law and international agreements leading up to the Act, …

The Supreme Court Performs The Right Notes For Dish In Aereo, Lee B. Burgunder

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

In American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., the Supreme Court addressed whether a company publicly performs copyrighted works when it allocates separate antennas on its property to customers who individually decide what shows they each want to watch. This case was hotly debated because it provided a new opportunity for the Court to identify the responsible actors when copyrighted materials are transmitted over the Internet. Unfortunately, the Court ruled against Aereo without clearly articulating governing standards that might inform future decisions, relying instead on what the dissent called a "looks-like-cable-TV" approach. The deficiency has already provided additional ammunition for …

Invalidated Patents And Associated Patent Examiners, Shine Tu

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

This study attempts to determine whether there are common characteristics between examiners who issue invalidated patents. This study uses two new patent databases that code for nearly 1.7 million patents and approximately one thousand patents that were litigated to a 'final" judgment between 2010 and 2011. This study finds that approximately one-third of patents that are litigated to final judgment are found invalid. Most invalidated patents are found in technology centers 1600, 2600, and 2700, which correspond to biotechnology and organic chemistry, communications, and computer science, respectively. Most patents are invalidated on prior art-type novelty and obviousness grounds. This study …

Applying Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Restrictions, J. Jonas Anderson

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

The US Supreme Court's difficulty in promulgating a standard for patent-eligibility has not gone unnoticed in the academy. Hundreds of academic conferences, including this one, have been devoted to the topic. The goal of this Article is not to solve the seemingly intractable problem of patent-eligibility doctrine. The goal of this Article is rather more modest. Instead of normatively assessing patent-eligible subject matter doctrine, this Article seeks to identify which foundational theories of patent-eligible subject matter can most readily be applied by courts and the US Patent and Trademark Office via Section 101. In doing so, this Article categorizes the …

Developments In Synthetic Biology Are Altering The Ip Imperatives Of Biotechnology, Christopher M. Holman

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

While the accomplishments of the biotechnology industry have been substantial, recent technological advances promise to dramatically increase the power and utility of the discipline over the coming years. The term "synthetic biology" has been coined to describe the application of these powerful new tools to the engineering of synthetic genetic sequences and organisms. In essence, synthetic biology represents the next iteration in the ongoing evolution of biotechnology, and hopes run high that in time, the fruits of synthetic biology will dwarf the past successes of conventional biotechnology. There is, however, some concern that the current patent-centric approach to Intellectual Property …

The Public Interest Inquiry For Permanent Injunctions Or Exclusion Orders: Shedding The Myopic Lens, P. Andrew Riley, Scott A. Allen

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

President Obama's 2013 veto of a US International Trade Commission (ITC) exclusion order, issued to address Apple Inc.'s infringement of a patent owned by Samsung, thrust the ITC's public interest inquiry into the spotlight. Historically, however, these factors rarely weighed against a remedy at the ITC. Likewise, US district courts have rarely declined to issue a permanent injunction after finding a patent valid and infringed due solely to the public interest factor--the last of the four factors that the Supreme Court put in place in eBay Inc. v. Merc Exchange, L.L.C. More recent decisions addressing the public interest in both …

Patent-Eligible Processes: An Audience Perspective, Timothy R. Holbrook, Mark D. Janis

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Many of the problems with modern patent-eligibility analysis can be traced back to a fundamental philosophical divide between judges who treat eligibility as the primary tool for effectuating patent policy and those who take patent-eligibility as nothing more than a coarse filter to be invoked in rare cases. After several years in which the coarse filter approach seemed to have the upper hand, the eligibility-as-king approach now is firmly in ascendancy. This Article resists that trend, exploring more centrist approaches to patent-eligibility, particularly in the context of process inventions. This Article first examines the practice of undertaking an eligibility analysis …

The International Copyright Problem And Durable Solutions, Susy Frankel

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

The calls for copyright reform at both the national and international level are growing louder. Many authors, owners, distributors, users, and consumers are dissatisfied with the current regime, but solutions are not easy to find. Existing rules are inadequate to deal with copyright in the digital world and partial solutions are not likely to be durable. The problems of copyright are not confined to one jurisdiction. Just as the creation and dissemination of copyright works are global, copyright's legal problems are an international problem. Existing international rules alone cannot provide the solution to this policy debate, but they do have …

The Internet After Aereo: How To Save Innovation From The Public Performance Right, Patrick C. Tricker

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

The Supreme Court's decision in American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. overturned the Second Circuit's rule that separate copies create separate performances without clarifying the scope of a performance. The decision creates significant ambiguity surrounding the public performance right and potentially massive liability for cloud-computing companies. Since cloud computing allows customers to run programs remotely from a company's servers, two independent customers watching different copies of the same movie from the same cloud results in the cloud conducting a public performance. This Note examines this problem, concludes that the current public performance regime has become obsolete, and proposes a …

Initial Interest Confusion "Internet Troika" Abandoned? A Critical Look At Initial Interest Confusion As Applied Online, Connie D. Nichols

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

The Ninth Circuit's opinion in Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. seemingly created a standard to be applied in trademark infringement cases on the Internet. Despite the cautions contained within the Ninth Circuit's holding, Brookfield ushered in an era in which many courts placed emphasis on three factors of the "likelihood of confusion" test finding initial interest confusion in many online infringement cases based solely on these three factors. For over a decade, inconsistent application within the Ninth Circuit and other jurisdictions created a disjointed body of case law on initial interest confusion online. The Ninth Circuit's opinion …

Father(S?) Of Rock & Roll: Why The Johnnie Johnson V. Chuck Berry Songwriting Suit Should Change The Way Copyright Law Determines Joint Authorship, Timothy J. Mcfarlin

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

"Father(s?) of Rock & Roll" utilizes a unique and historic resource--the previously unseen deposition testimony of Chuck Berry and his piano man Johnnie Johnson--to analyze the problems with how copyright law currently determines joint authorship and to propose a new "Berry-Johnson" joint authorship test. In 2000, Johnson sued Berry, claiming he co-wrote the music to nearly all the significant songs in the Berry canon. Granted access to the case file, I quote and analyze key portions of their deposition testimony, using it as a case study of high-level collaborative creativity and exploring what it can teach us about how best …

Entering The Innovation Twilight Zone: How Patent And Antitrust Law Must Work Together, Jeffrey I.D. Lewis, Maggie Wittlin

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law

Patent law and antitrust law have traded ascendancy over the last century, as courts and other institutions have tended to favor one at the expense of the other. In this Article, we take several steps toward stabilizing the doctrine surrounding these two branches of law. First, we argue that an optimal balance between patent rights and antitrust enforcement exists that will maximize consumer welfare, including promoting innovation and economic growth. Further, as Congress is the best institution to find this optimum, courts should enforce both statutes according to their literal text, which grants absolute patent rights but allows for more …