Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Patents (57)
- Copyright (41)
- Federal Circuit (26)
- PTAB (17)
- Intellectual property (16)
-
- AIA (15)
- Supreme Court (15)
- Patent (13)
- Fair use (11)
- America Invents Act (9)
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board (9)
- Patent infringement (8)
- First Amendment (7)
- Inter partes review (7)
- Trademark (7)
- USPTO (7)
- Patent law (6)
- Digital Millennium Copyright Act (5)
- European Union (5)
- IPR (5)
- Infringement (5)
- Innovation (5)
- License (5)
- Patent litigation (5)
- Antitrust (4)
- Copyright Act (4)
- Copyright infringement (4)
- Trademarks (4)
- AIA trials (3)
- Art (3)
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 30 of 344
Full-Text Articles in Law
Written Statement: Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. V. Goldsmith, Yolanda M. King
Written Statement: Andy Warhol Foundation For The Visual Arts, Inc. V. Goldsmith, Yolanda M. King
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
The Death Of The Litmus Test, Dale Cendali, Abbey Quigley
The Death Of The Litmus Test, Dale Cendali, Abbey Quigley
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Inside Or Outside?: Remarks On Abitron V. Hetronic (U.S. 2023), Margaret Chon
Inside Or Outside?: Remarks On Abitron V. Hetronic (U.S. 2023), Margaret Chon
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Jack Daniel’S Properties V. Vip Products And The Current State Of Trademark Fair Use, Christine Haight Farley
Jack Daniel’S Properties V. Vip Products And The Current State Of Trademark Fair Use, Christine Haight Farley
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Surveys In Jack Daniel’S V. Vip, Shari Seidman Diamond
Surveys In Jack Daniel’S V. Vip, Shari Seidman Diamond
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Trypanophobia: The Scary World Of Tattoos And The Law, Dalton Primeaux
Trypanophobia: The Scary World Of Tattoos And The Law, Dalton Primeaux
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Enablement For Genus Claims: A Bifurcated Approach, Jie Yang
Enablement For Genus Claims: A Bifurcated Approach, Jie Yang
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Abstract After two jury trials, two trips to the Federal Circuit, and two petitions to the Supreme Court, the Court this past term decided Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi without much controversy. In a unanimous decision, the Court affirmed the invalidation of Amgen’s functional antibody claims for lack of enablement. As a result, inventors down the road, not just life sciences companies, may find it more difficult to obtain broad patents. Although the Court was clear that Amgen may not “monopolize an entire class of things defined by their function,” the opinion fell short of guiding lower courts on how to …
Exploring The Role Of Patent Offices In Climate Change Mitigation, Johanna Rahnasto
Exploring The Role Of Patent Offices In Climate Change Mitigation, Johanna Rahnasto
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Patent offices are developing new programs to help in climate change mit- igation. What can they deliver? This Article provides a contemporary overview of the different green technology initiatives promoted by patent offices: fast- tracking of patent applications, search platforms, applicant resources, and publicity and awareness programs. The Article concludes that special treat- ment of green technology is fair and administrable when programs are openly accessible but narrowly tailored. The most tangible effect of these initiatives is the increased control by the patentee over the patenting and commercialization process, which is valuable even when effects of these programs on technology …
Balancing The Scales: Analyzing Motivation To Combine And Avoiding Impermissible Hindsight In 2023, Michael Pomeroy
Balancing The Scales: Analyzing Motivation To Combine And Avoiding Impermissible Hindsight In 2023, Michael Pomeroy
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Motions To Submit Supplemental Information: An Infrequently Utilized Procedure, Matthew Johnson, Ashvi Patel
Motions To Submit Supplemental Information: An Infrequently Utilized Procedure, Matthew Johnson, Ashvi Patel
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Reading Trademark Tea-Leaves At The Supreme Court, Graeme B. Dinwoodie
Reading Trademark Tea-Leaves At The Supreme Court, Graeme B. Dinwoodie
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Some Thoughts On Warhol And The Future Of Transformative Works, Zvi S. Rosen
Some Thoughts On Warhol And The Future Of Transformative Works, Zvi S. Rosen
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Comments On Amgen V. Sanofi, Oskar Liivak
Comments On Amgen V. Sanofi, Oskar Liivak
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Amgen V. Sanofi And The Return Of Patent Formalism To The Supreme Court, Laura Pedraza-Fariña
Amgen V. Sanofi And The Return Of Patent Formalism To The Supreme Court, Laura Pedraza-Fariña
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Certificates Of Correction And Aia Trials, Andrew Kerrick
Certificates Of Correction And Aia Trials, Andrew Kerrick
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
The Patent Trial And Appeal Board: A Heightened Call For Transparency, Nicole Bruner
The Patent Trial And Appeal Board: A Heightened Call For Transparency, Nicole Bruner
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Security Researchers Battle Against The Dmca, Andre Sardaryzadeh
Security Researchers Battle Against The Dmca, Andre Sardaryzadeh
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
In the digital age, cybersecurity plays a principal role in resolving consumer concerns regarding data breaches. Nevertheless, United States copyright laws prohibit the effective use of cybersecurity tools that disrupt malicious hackers from gaining access to personal (and sensitive) information. One law, in specific, that is detrimental to the defense against malicious attackers is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”). Specifically, section 1201 of the DMCA prohibits the circumvention of copyrighted information. Malicious hackers have various tools and techniques to obtain unauthorized access to personal information via software vulnerabilities. Importantly, these vulnerabilities often result in the theft of consumers’ personal …
Goodwill, Signification, And Settling The Debate Regarding Naked Assignments And Licenses, Tony Bortolin
Goodwill, Signification, And Settling The Debate Regarding Naked Assignments And Licenses, Tony Bortolin
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Never Tell Me The Odds: How To Avoid Infringement When Alluding To Copyrighted Works In Branding, Paul M. Matenaer
Never Tell Me The Odds: How To Avoid Infringement When Alluding To Copyrighted Works In Branding, Paul M. Matenaer
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Alluding to copyrighted works in branding is common, especially among small businesses that tend to fly under the radar of the large corporations which own those copyrights. The craft beer industry, for example, is fond of such allusions, incorporating references to movies, comic books, and video games in product names and beer labels. Whether to pay homage to the creative genius found in those copyrighted works or to cash in on popular enthusiasm for them, brand allusions to copyrighted works are common. However, such homages to copyrighted works can be as dangerous as flying into an asteroid field because they …
Rebranding Batman, Alice Preminger
Rebranding Batman, Alice Preminger
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
While one could reasonably characterize fan fiction as "socially contro- versial,” with some lauding the practice as a creative outlet and others meeting it with sneers, legally speaking, its position is undeniably precarious. Fan con- tent, including fan fiction and fan films, lives in the liminal space between cop- yright infringement and fair use. Fan creators argue their works are motivated by a desire to connect with beloved copyrighted expressive works—frequently popular media franchises—and are intended only for enjoyment by themselves and very small fan communities. Copyright owners find the practice of creating fan work far less innocuous, claiming the …
Editorial Board, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Editorial Board, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Table Of Contents, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Frand Royalties: Rules V Standards?, Nicolas Petit, Amandine Léonard
Frand Royalties: Rules V Standards?, Nicolas Petit, Amandine Léonard
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Royalties for intellectual property (IP) are like taxes. Everyone agrees that some limits are necessary. However, no one agrees on the levels at which the limits should be set. One way to overcome disagreement consists in asking if a legal rule or standard should govern the limits of IP royalties. This paper discusses this issue in the context of Standard Essential Patents (“SEPs”) governed by a commitment to license on Fair Reasonable and Non Discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms. The paper finds that FRAND rules generally surpass standards, but only under specific conditions.
Unravelling Inventorship, Toshiko Takenaka
Unravelling Inventorship, Toshiko Takenaka
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Inventorship, who made an invention, is one of the most important concepts under the U.S. patent system. Incorrect inventorship determinations result in patent invalidity not only because U.S. Constitution requires granting patents to true inventors, but also first-inventor- to-file novelty inherited many aspects of first-to-invent novelty which depended on inventorship whether to include prior inventions as prior art. Correcting inventorship may result in sharing patent exclusivity with competitors, which forfeits profits necessary to recover expensive development costs. However, the standard to determine inventorship has been called muddy by judges and commentators because neither the Patent Act nor case law provide …
Engaging With Outlaw Art, Jonathan Barrett
Engaging With Outlaw Art, Jonathan Barrett
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Copyright Notice, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Copyright Notice, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intelletual Property Editorial Board 2021-2022, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intelletual Property Editorial Board 2021-2022, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Table Of Contents, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Table Of Contents, Chicago-Kent Journal Of Intellectual Property
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
Reexamining The Reviewed: Challenging Patents Subject To Inter Partes Review Via Ex Parte Reexamination, Ellyar Y. Barazesh
Reexamining The Reviewed: Challenging Patents Subject To Inter Partes Review Via Ex Parte Reexamination, Ellyar Y. Barazesh
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
No abstract provided.
The Art Of Cross-Examination In Ptab Trials, Philip D. Segrest Jr.
The Art Of Cross-Examination In Ptab Trials, Philip D. Segrest Jr.
Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property
Despite similarities in form, a cross-examination in a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) trial constitutes trial testimony, which is different from a discovery deposition occurring in civil litigation. While most practitioners would readily recognize this distinction in the abstract, it can be easy to fall back into patterns learned in and applicable to pretrial discovery in civil litigation that may not fit for a PTAB cross-examination. The PTAB regulations describe cross-examination as “routine discovery” in the “form of a deposition transcript,” but a civil action discovery deposition and a PTAB trial cross-examination deposition differ in their goals, their applicable …