Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Patent Act (3)
- TRIPS (2)
- WTO (2)
- World Trade Organization (2)
- AT&T Corp. v. Microsoft Corp (1)
-
- Abend v. MCA (1)
- BCGI (1)
- BPAI (1)
- Bandag Inc. v. Gerrard Tire Co (1)
- Bayer AG v. Housey Pharmaceuticals Inc (1)
- Biotechnological (1)
- Blackmun (1)
- Blogger Beware: Ethical Considerations for Legal Blogs (1)
- Blogosphere (1)
- Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (1)
- Boston Communications Group Inc (1)
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Brown v. Duchesne (1)
- CAFC (1)
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. (1)
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co (1)
- Copyright Act (1)
- Darcy v. Allein (1)
- Decca Ltd. v. United States (1)
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp (1)
- Devices for Medicine Inc. v. Boehl (1)
- Disney Enterprises Inc. v. Delane (1)
- Dowagiac Mfg. Co. v. Minn. Moline Plow Co (1)
- Dun v. Lumbermen’s Credit Association (1)
- EBay v. MercExchange (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 271(E)(1): The End Of Enforceable Biotechnology Patents In Drug Discovery?, Paul T. Nyffeler
The Safe Harbor Of 35 U.S.C. § 271(E)(1): The End Of Enforceable Biotechnology Patents In Drug Discovery?, Paul T. Nyffeler
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its second issue of the 2007–2008 academic school year. Our authors tackle a number of emerging issues in ways we think you’ll find especially interesting.
Almost Quiet On The Copyright Front: Ebay’S False Alarm, Jetti Gibson
Almost Quiet On The Copyright Front: Ebay’S False Alarm, Jetti Gibson
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
In the current digital millennium, intellectual property law is constantly besieged by new technologies, threatening various patent, trademark, and copyright protections. Though intellectual property law shields individual rights on the one hand, on the other hand the overarching purpose of this protection was not to espouse a regime of private ownership, but to imbue the Founders’ intent within a legal framework by “promot[ing] the Progress of Science and the useful Arts,” through “secur[ing] for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” The grant of a copyright was merely a means to serve …
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Introduction: Contains Cover, Table Of Contents, Letter From The Editor, And Masthead, Eileen R. Geller
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology is proud to present its first issue of the 2007–2008 academic school year. To start off the new academic year, our authors present new ideas on the age old topic of Patent Law.
The “First-To-File” Patent System: Why Adoption Is Not An Option!, Rebecca C.E. Mcfadyen
The “First-To-File” Patent System: Why Adoption Is Not An Option!, Rebecca C.E. Mcfadyen
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
As the United States’ national pastime, baseball has taught valuable lessons to generations of Americans. For example, players often learn how to be good teammates, how to set goals, and how to exercise discipline. Baseball has other important life lessons to share as well such as the value of “chemistry.” Chemistry is that intangible quality that allows individual players, each with a differing skill set and personal agenda, to work together and propel the team forward. It is what makes a team, a team.
When Offshore Activities Become Infringing: Applying § 271 To Technologies That “Straddle” Territorial Borders, Eric W. Guttag
When Offshore Activities Become Infringing: Applying § 271 To Technologies That “Straddle” Territorial Borders, Eric W. Guttag
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Patents have traditionally been territorial creatures. The territorial nature of U.S. patents is reflected by the main infringement statute, § 271 of Title 35. For example, § 271(a) says that “whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefore, infringes the patent.”
To Mark Or Not To Mark: Application Of The Patent Marking Statute To Websites And The Internet, Eugene Goryunov, Mark Polyakov
To Mark Or Not To Mark: Application Of The Patent Marking Statute To Websites And The Internet, Eugene Goryunov, Mark Polyakov
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Patentees, and persons making, offering for sale, or selling within the United States any patented article for or under them, or importing any patented article into the United States, may give notice to the public that the same is patented, either by fixing thereon the word "patent" or the abbreviation "pat.", together with the number of the patent, or when, from the character of the article, this can not be done, by fixing to it, or to the package wherein one or more of them is contained, a label containing a like notice. In the event of failure so to …
Anti-Competitive Abuse Of Ip Rights And Compulsory Licensing Through The International Dimension Of The Trips Agreement And The Stockholm Proposal For Its Amendment, Haris Apostolopoulos
Anti-Competitive Abuse Of Ip Rights And Compulsory Licensing Through The International Dimension Of The Trips Agreement And The Stockholm Proposal For Its Amendment, Haris Apostolopoulos
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
No abstract provided.