Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Copyright (4)
- Intellectual Property Law (4)
- International Law (3)
- Patent (3)
- TRIPS Agreement (3)
-
- Champagne (2)
- Data exclusivity (2)
- Geographical Indications (2)
- WTO (2)
- Arnstein (1)
- Arnstein test (1)
- Artificial intelligence inventorship (1)
- Australia (1)
- Automated licensing (1)
- Big data (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Certification marks (1)
- Clusters (1)
- Cognac (1)
- Collective management (1)
- Common law (1)
- Confusion (1)
- Copyright Law (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Copyright registries (1)
- Court (1)
- Developing countries (1)
- Digital rights management (DRM) (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Distributed ledger technology (DLT) (1)
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Improper Appropriation, Daniel J. Gervais
Improper Appropriation, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
The traditional (Arnstein) test for copyright infringement is satisfied when the owner of a valid copyright establishes unauthorized copying by the defendant. To demonstrate unauthorized copying, one of the major tests is that the plaintiff must first show that her work was actually copied; second, she must establish substantial similarity and/or that the copying amounts to an improper or unlawful appropriation. The second prong is satisfied when (i) protected expression in the earlier work was copied and (ii) the amount of the copyrighted work that is copied must be more than de minimis. This Article examines, first, how impropriety has …
The Patent Option, Daniel J. Gervais
The Patent Option, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
There is a shift in the shape of intellectual property (IP) tools used to strengthen and lengthen the right of pharmaceutical companies to exclude others from making and marketing their products. Patents have traditionally been the tool of choice. Over the past two decades, however, pharmaceutical companies have increased their degree of reliance on a right known as “data exclusivity.” This right, which now exists in most major jurisdictions, is the right to prevent third parties from relying on the clinical trial data submitted by another pharmaceutical company to obtain marketing approval for a bioequivalent or biosimilar product. The right …
Intellectual Property: A Beacon For Reform Of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Daniel J. Gervais
Intellectual Property: A Beacon For Reform Of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
Investor-state dispute-settlement (ISDS) clauses give multinational investors (corporations) a right to sue a state in a binding proceeding before an independent arbitration tribunal. This jurisgenerative right to file a claim in an international tribunal with mandatory jurisdiction is generally reserved to States. ISDS is a mechanism meant to protect the private property of multinational investors against certain acts of public authorities.
Intellectual Property differs from the more traditional private (property) law interests that ISDS aims to protect. IP incorporates public policy objectives such as innovation, access to information or public health that are reflected in limitations and exceptions to the …
Exploring The Interfaces Between Big Data And Intellectual Property Law, Daniel J. Gervais
Exploring The Interfaces Between Big Data And Intellectual Property Law, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
This article reviews the application of several IP rights (copyright, patent, sui generis database right, data exclusivity and trade secret) to Big Data. Beyond the protection of software used to collect and process Big Data corpora, copyright’s traditional role is challenged by the relatively unstructured nature of the non-relational (noSQL) databases typical of Big Data corpora. This also impacts the application of the EU sui generis right in databases. Misappropriation (tort-based) or anti-parasitic behaviour protection might apply, where available, to data generated by AI systems that has high but short-lived value. Copyright in material contained in Big Data corpora must …
Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Human Rights And Regulatory Lessons From "Lilly V. Canada", Daniel J. Gervais
Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Human Rights And Regulatory Lessons From "Lilly V. Canada", Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
The triangular interface between trade, intellectual property (IP) and human rights has yet to be fully formed, both doctrinally and normatively. Adding investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) to the mix increases the complexity of the equations to solve. Two resultant issues are explored in this Article. First, the Article considers ways in which broader public policy objectives—in particular the protection of human rights—can and should be factored into determinations of whether a state’s action is compatible with its trade obligations and commitments in the state-to-state dispute settlement context. Second, the Article examines whether doctrinal tools used in state-to-state, trade-dispute settlement to …
The Patent Option, Daniel Gervais
The Patent Option, Daniel Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
Improper Appropriation, Daniel Gervais
Improper Appropriation, Daniel Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
Intellectual Property: A Beacon For Reform Of Investor-State Dispute Settlement,, Daniel Gervais
Intellectual Property: A Beacon For Reform Of Investor-State Dispute Settlement,, Daniel Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
Blockchain And Smart Contracts: The Missing Link In Copyright Licensing?, Balazs Bodo, Daniel Gervais, Joao Pedro Quintais
Blockchain And Smart Contracts: The Missing Link In Copyright Licensing?, Balazs Bodo, Daniel Gervais, Joao Pedro Quintais
Daniel J Gervais
Irreconcilable Differences? The Geneva Act Of The Lisbon Agreement And The Common Law, Daniel Gervais
Irreconcilable Differences? The Geneva Act Of The Lisbon Agreement And The Common Law, Daniel Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
The Protection Of Performers Under U.S. Law In Comparative Perspective, Daniel Gervais
The Protection Of Performers Under U.S. Law In Comparative Perspective, Daniel Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
The Garcia v Google case raised fundamental questions about US law as it applies to performed works. This Essay uses a comparative lens to shed some hopefully useful light on the debate. The Essay proceeds essentially in two parts. First, the Essay explores and critiques the international protection of performers’ rights using both history and policy as focal points. The following part describes the protection of performers and other owners of “related rights” in US law and explains the differences that adopting a related rights regime would bring about in the United States.
Who Cares About The 85 Percent? Reconsidering Survey Evidence Of Online Confusion In Trademark Cases, Daniel Gervais, Julie M. Latsko
Who Cares About The 85 Percent? Reconsidering Survey Evidence Of Online Confusion In Trademark Cases, Daniel Gervais, Julie M. Latsko
Daniel J Gervais
There is an assumption in US trademark law that the protection of consumer interests—a traditional normative pillar of trademark law--is best achieved by enjoining use by a defendant of a mark that creates a likelihood of confusion (with the plaintiff’s mark) for 15% or more (sometimes less) of relevant consumers. Courts often use survey evidence to determined existence of the likelihood of confusion. This article argues that the interests of all consumers are relevant in that determination. This means that determining the costs, if any, imposed on nonconfused consumers should also be part of the equation. This can be accomplished …
Trips & Development, Daniel J. Gervais
Trips & Development, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
This brief Chapter in the (forthcoming) SAGE Handbook of Intellectual Property examines available data and analyses concerning the impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) on development. The Chapter considers distinctions among types of countries and industries, and the role of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
Plain Packaging And The Interpretation Of The Trips Agreement, Daniel J. Gervais, Susy Frankel
Plain Packaging And The Interpretation Of The Trips Agreement, Daniel J. Gervais, Susy Frankel
Daniel J Gervais
Plain packaging of cigarettes as a way of reducing tobacco consumption and its related health costs and effects raises a number of international trade law issues. The plain packaging measures adopted in Australia impose strict format requirements on word trademarks (such as Marlboro or Camel) and ban the use of figurative marks (colors, logos, etc.). As a result, questions have been raised as to plain packaging’s compatibility with the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). WTO members can validly take measures to protect and promote public health, but in doing so they …
Cognac After Spanish Champagne ? Geographical Indications As Certification Marks, Daniel J. Gervais
Cognac After Spanish Champagne ? Geographical Indications As Certification Marks, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
The Protection of Geographical Names as Certification Marks in common law jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and the United States is examined in light of the UK Spansih Champagne and other "Drinks" cases and similar cases in the United States dealing with the name "Cognac."
Copyright, E-Commerce And The World Wide Web, Daniel J. Gervais
Copyright, E-Commerce And The World Wide Web, Daniel J. Gervais
Daniel J Gervais
This early (2001) piece on the impact of the online environment on the significance and enforcement of copyright is now available online. It begins by defining concepts that were new at the time, such as Digital Rights Management (DRM) and Electronic Copyright management Systems (ECMS), and the changes in business models, both those already taking place and those that could be expected to happen. It then explores the notions of negative and positive licensing and makes the point, which future events would seem to bear out, that both right holders and users do better when right holders focus on maximizing …