Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Patent Contingent Fee Litigation, David Schwartz Mar 2012

Patent Contingent Fee Litigation, David Schwartz

David L. Schwartz

No abstract provided.


Patently Ours? Constitutional Challenges To Dna Patents, Vincent Ling Jan 2012

Patently Ours? Constitutional Challenges To Dna Patents, Vincent Ling

Vincent Y. Ling

This Comment analyzes constitutional issues raised by gene patenting and details how the issues apply to various types of DNA patents. In Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, the Federal Circuit recently held that genes and DNA sequences are patentable under the federal statute for patent eligible subject matter, 35 U.S.C. § 101, but courts have thus far avoided addressing the constitutional challenges raised by plaintiffs. This Comment confronts those constitutional issues and makes a determination as to their strengths and weaknesses. Moreover, it explores additional constitutional issues that may become more salient over time. Ultimately, …


Better A Sword Than A Shield: The Case For Statutory Fair Dealing/Use Right As Opposed To A Defence In The Light Of The Disenfranchising Effect Of Digital Rights Management And Anti-Circumvention Laws, Warren B. Chik Jan 2012

Better A Sword Than A Shield: The Case For Statutory Fair Dealing/Use Right As Opposed To A Defence In The Light Of The Disenfranchising Effect Of Digital Rights Management And Anti-Circumvention Laws, Warren B. Chik

Warren Bartholomew Chik

This paper endorses a reinvention of the general and flexible fair use doctrine through the simple powerful elevation of its legal status from a legal exception to that of a legal right, and identifies all the benefits that a fair use right entails.


Settlement Of India/Eu Wto Dispute Re Seizures Of In-Transit Medicines: Why The Proposed Eu Border Regulation Isn't Good Enough, Brook Baker Jan 2012

Settlement Of India/Eu Wto Dispute Re Seizures Of In-Transit Medicines: Why The Proposed Eu Border Regulation Isn't Good Enough, Brook Baker

Brook K. Baker

European Customs officials have used fictive patent rights to justify the seizure of lawful generic medicines produced in India and destined for non- European markets. Following a public outcry and initiation of two WTO complaints, the EU has proposed amendments to Border Regulations Measure 1383/2003. The Proposed Border Regulation in its current form will not adequately resolve the risk of interception in Europe of medicines lawfully manufactured and exported from India and destined for lawful import and consumption in a non-EU country. This analysis concludes that multiple weaknesses remain in the Border Regulations, including: (1) continued coverage of alleged patent …


Acta - Risks Of Third-Party Enforcement For Access To Medicines, Brook Baker Jan 2012

Acta - Risks Of Third-Party Enforcement For Access To Medicines, Brook Baker

Brook K. Baker

In its current near-final draft form, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement [ACTA] being negotiated plurilaterally—and largely secretly—by a self-selected group of countries proposes to allow preliminary and final injunctive relief against third parties (third-party enforcement) to prevent infringement of intellectual property rights and/or to prevent infringing goods from entering into the channels of commerce. There is lingering uncertainty whether the relevant civil enforcement section will apply to the entire range of intellectual property rights or whether patents will be excluded. If patents are excluded, the dangers in ACTA would be reduced but not eliminated—new globalized forms of third-party enforcement would still …


In Search Of A Forum For The Families Of The Guantanamo Disappeared, Peter Honigsberg Dec 2011

In Search Of A Forum For The Families Of The Guantanamo Disappeared, Peter Honigsberg

Peter J Honigsberg

The United States government has committed grave human rights violations by disappearing people during the past decade into the detention camps in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. And for nearly thirty years, beginning with a 1983 decision from a case arising in Uruguay, there has been a well-developed body of international law establishing that parents, wives and children of the disappeared suffer torture, or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment (CID).

This paper argues that the rights of family members were severely violated when their loved ones were disappeared into Guantanamo. Family members of men disappeared by the United States have legitimate claims …