Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Abandoned property (1)
- Aggregate liability (1)
- Bills (1)
- Bishop Keane v. Century Fire Insurance Co. (1)
- Caldwell v. The Stadacona Fire and Life Ins. Co. (1)
-
- Carriers (1)
- Chattel mortgages (1)
- Continuation certificates (1)
- Doctrine of Swift v. Tyson (1)
- Double liability (1)
- Implied warranties (1)
- Inheritance taxes (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Multiple contract theory (1)
- Municipal corporations (1)
- Negotiable Instruments Law (1)
- Parents (1)
- Ramsdell v. Insurrance Co. (1)
- Repairs (1)
- Swift v. Tyson (1)
- Torts (1)
- Wills (1)
- Wisconsin (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fire Insurance-Is "Double" Payment Necessarily Overpayment?
Fire Insurance-Is "Double" Payment Necessarily Overpayment?
Michigan Law Review
A recent Wisconsin case, Ramsdell v. Insurance Co., presents a novel and interesting situation. The lessor and lessee of business property each insured the property in separate companies, the lessor for $3,000 and the lessee for $7,500. The lease contained no provisions as to insurance, repairing, or rebuilding and there was no contract between any of the parties which could affect the situation that arose. A loss of $4,246 occurred in June. After lengthy negotiations had proved fruitless, the lessee rebuilt the premises and sued his insurer. At the same time the lessor sued on his policy. The lessee …
The Application Of The Doctrine Of Swift V. Tyson Since 1900, H. Parker Sharp, Joseph B. Brennan
The Application Of The Doctrine Of Swift V. Tyson Since 1900, H. Parker Sharp, Joseph B. Brennan
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Recent Important Decisions
Michigan Law Review
A collection of recent important court decisions.
Fidelity Bonds-Does It Pay To Renew Them?
Fidelity Bonds-Does It Pay To Renew Them?
Michigan Law Review
The question is raised by a recent Michigan case, in which the facts are apparently illustrative of a normal practice in modern business. The employer purchases a fidelity bond to indemnify him against loss arising from the financial misconduct of one of his employees. The premium pays for protection, for the year 1928, to the amount of $5,000. A year later payment of a premium of the same amount results in his receiving a "renewal" or "continuation certificate." 'What is the legal, and what the practical, effect of the renewal?
Survival Of Action--Liability Insurance--Direct Right Against The Insurer, James E. Hogue Jr.
Survival Of Action--Liability Insurance--Direct Right Against The Insurer, James E. Hogue Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.