Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law

1993

Washington Law Review

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

From Quantification To Qualification: A State Court's Distortion Of The Law In In Re General Adjudication Of All Rights To Use Water In The Big Horn River System, Berrie Martinis Apr 1993

From Quantification To Qualification: A State Court's Distortion Of The Law In In Re General Adjudication Of All Rights To Use Water In The Big Horn River System, Berrie Martinis

Washington Law Review

The Wyoming Supreme Court applied state law to Indian reserved water rights in its recent decision in In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System (Big Horn III). Prior to Big Horn III, courts never applied state law to such rights. This Note argues that the Wyoming decision contradicts federal reserved water rights law and federal Indian law, and concludes that Congress should enact legislation overturning the Big Horn III decision.


Recognizing Sovereignty In Alaska Native Villages After The Passage Of Ancsa, Patricia Thompson Apr 1993

Recognizing Sovereignty In Alaska Native Villages After The Passage Of Ancsa, Patricia Thompson

Washington Law Review

The federal law principles of tribal sovereignty and Indian country define the parameters of tribal self-governance. In Alaska, however, federal and state courts remain divided on the issues of Alaska Native Village sovereignty and Indian country. This Comment examines the state and federal court treatment of these issues, and concludes that Native Villages are sovereign tribes and the lands set aside under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act should define the boundaries of Indian country in Alaska.