Law Commons^™

Affidavit Of Arthur Gardenswartz, Arthur Gardenswartz

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.

Affidavit Of Paul Fore, Paul Fore

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.

Proceedings In Regard To The Construction Of The Mission And Pueblo Of Our Lady Of Sorrow Of Sandia, Concerning Which This Attestation, To The Letter, Is Sent To The Superior Government Of This New Spain As Will Be Perceived Within Etc., Fray Juan Miguel Menchero, Joachin Codallos Y Rabal, Bernardo Antonio De Bustamante Y Tagle, Myra Ellen Jenkins

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

This is a copy of a translation with the original text of the Spanish document granting land to the Pueblo of Sandia.

An Act To Provide For The Settlement Of The Water Rights Claims Of The Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe In Yavapai County, Az, And For Other Purposes, United States 103rd Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: An Act To Provide for the Settlement of the Water Rights Claims of the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe in Yavapai County, Arizona, and for Other Purposes, P.L. 103-434, 108 Stat. 4526 (Oct. 31, 1994. Parties: Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, AZ, Prescott, Chino Valley Irrigation District & US. Title I of the Act is the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1994, which ratifies the Settlement Agreement entered into by the Tribe, AZ, US, Prescott, and the Chino Valley Irrigation District. It provides for the settlement of all water between and among the parties. The Secretary is authorized to …

Yavapai-Prescott Indian Water Rights Settlement Act Of 1994, United States 103rd Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: Title 1, Sec. 101(b)(5) of An Act to Provide for the Settlement of the Water Rights Claims of the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe in Yavapai County, AZ, and for Other Purposes, PL103-434 (OCT. 31, 1994) Title 1, Sec. 101(b)(5) repeals section 406(k) of Public Law 101-628 which authorizes $30,000,000 in appropriations for the acquisition of land and water resources in the Verde River basin and for the development thereof as an alternative source of water for the Fort McDowell Indian Community. [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-108/pdf/STATUTE-108-Pg4526.pdf]

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 32, Fall Issue, Aug. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Agenda: Water Organizations In A Changing West, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Water Organizations in a Changing West (Summer Conference, June 14-16)

Conference organizers, faculty and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell, David H. Getches and James N. Corbridge, Jr.

Water organizations in the western United States range from small, traditional acequia associations to large metropolitan water suppliers. What do these vastly different kinds of organizations have in common? All are feeling the pressures of change in the region--growing urban populations, environmental concerns, and calls for public participation.

This year's summer program will examine how water organizations are adapting to these pressures for change. Speakers drawn from urban, agricultural, and community organizations will share their experiences …

San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act Of 1992, Amendment Of 1994, United States 103rd Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation| 1994 Amendment to the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992, in Indian Laws Technical Corrections (May 31, 1994) at Sec 2. PL 103-263, 108 Stat. 575 Parties: San Carlos Apache Tribe & US. Amending Sec. 3704(d) of the San Carlos Apache Tribe Water Rights Settlement Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-575 amended by deleting "reimbursable'' and inserting in lieu thereof "nonreimbursable". [Source: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=GPO&browsePath=United+States+Statutes+at+Large+%28Digitized%29%2F1994&isCollapsed=false&leafLevelBrowse=false&isDocumentResults=true&ycord=1025]

Northern Cheyenne Indian Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act Of 1992, Amendments Of 1994, United States 103rd Congress

Native American Water Rights Settlement Project

Federal Legislation: Northern Cheyenne Indian Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of 1994, Sec. 1. PL 103-263, 108 Stat. 575. Amending PL 102-374 by adding provisions assigning responsibility of cost of environmental compliance for Tongue River Dam Project to the US, including reimbursements to MT. [Source| http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=GPO&browsePath=United+States+Statutes+at+Large+%28Digitized%29%2F1994&isCollapsed=false&leafLevelBrowse=false&isDocumentResults=true&ycord=1025]

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 31, Spring Issue, Apr. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Recognizing And Enforcing State And Tribal Judgments: A Round Table Discussion Of Law, Policy And Practice, Christine Zuni Cruz, Mario E. Occhialino Jr., Philip Sam Deloria, Richard E. Ranson Honorable, Robert N. Clinton, Robert Laurence, Nell Jessup Newton

Faculty Scholarship

Let me begin with a word of introduction. For a long time, we at the American Indian Law Center have been interested in and concerned about the growth and strengthening of tribal governmental institutions. Tribal sovereignty is often talked about in the abstract, but people are somewhat reluctant to deal with the practical issues that are involved when sovereignty is actually exercised: the give and take that governments do all the time in their relationships with each other. We tried to take the leadership a number of years ago in looking at some of the practical issues involved in the …

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 30, Winter Issue, Jan. 1994, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

The Cloaking Of Justice: The Supreme Court's Role In The Application Of Western Law To America's Indigenous Peoples, David E. Wilkins

Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications

The debate over which legal Indigenous Peoples should govern Native American political power and property rights, or even whether they should be protected by law at all, caused conflicts challenging the autonomy of the legal system and led to changes of the original principles of Indian rights. The outcome of that conflict raises two questions of federal Indian law. One is where its principles contributed to the survival of Native Americans in the United States; the other is whether the same legal principles are responsible for the perpetual inferiority of Natives Americans in their own land. More starkly, the question …

The Native Hawaiian People And International Human Rights Law: Toward A Remedy For Past And Continuing Wrongs, S. James Anaya

Publications

No abstract provided.

Reconsidering The Tribal-State Compact Process, David E. Wilkins

Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications

This essay evaluates the tribal‐state compact process, as one of several alternative, nonadversarial processes, warranting attention. It argues that, because of its binding character and relatively low cost (in contrast to litigation), and because it is based in the idea of tribes and states exhibiting mutual respect, the compact process is an advanced version of negotiation and bargaining that tribes and states should consider where appropriate.

The U.S. Supreme Court's Explication Of "Federal Plenary Power": An Analysis Of Case Law Affecting Tribal Sovereignty, 1886-1914, David E. Wilkins

Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications

The concept of tribal sovereignty frequently conflicts with that of congressional plenary power, depending on the definition and basis of plenary power. Analysis of 107 federal court cases between 1886 and 1914 suggests that when plenary power is seen in terms of preemption and exclusivity, it may help to protect tribal sovereignty from private or state incursions. However, if plenary power is defined as absolute and unlimited, tribal rights are not constitutionally protected against federal actions. Although tribes are properly regarded as extra-constitutional entities, they are often treated as inferior in relation to Congress by the courts.

Intra-Tribal Confrontations: What Is To Be Done?, David E. Wilkins

Jepson School of Leadership Studies articles, book chapters and other publications

Racial, ethnic, and religious wars and conflicts have plagued humanity since the primordial past. But since the thawing of the Cold War, there has literally been an explosion of devastating conflicts that seem far more complex than those which erupted in earlier eras. These are also potentially more threatening to international peace because of their breadth, scope, and probable duration.

These and the multitude of other ethnic, racial, and religious conflicts around the world are far more brutal and ruinous than anything most indigenous people have experienced since the federal government's aberrant and fortunately short-lived policy of Termination and Relocation, …

Power And Presumptions; Rules And Rhetoric; Institutions And Indian Law, Deborah A. Geier

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

This 1994 article explores how unspoken, underlying presumptions shifted in Supreme Court jurisprudence regarding the analysis of tribal sovereignty.

A Choice For K'Aila: Child Protection And First Nations Children, Jocelyn Downie

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

K'aila's story raises serious questions about child protection and First Nations children. Was it appropriate that a non-First Nations social services agency made the initial assessment of whether K'aila was in need of protection, that a non-First Nations court had the power to decide whether K'aila was in need of protection, and that Francois and Leslie's decision was held to a non-First Nations standard of care? Was K'aila well-served by the child welfare system?

American Indian Law And History: Instructional Mirrors, Gloria Valencia-Weber

Faculty Scholarship

This article is an expanison of a presentation delivered on January 8, 1993 at the Association of American Law Schools annual meeting. The author presents her interdisciplinary approach to teaching a course on Native American Rights.

Legitimation And Statutory Interpretation: Conquest, Consent, And Community In Federal Indian Law, David C. Williams

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Introduction: Symposium On Native American Law, Milner S. Ball

Scholarly Works

The Symposium gathered here is a wonderfully illuminating core sample of contemporary legal scholarship on the relationship between the American government and Native Americans.