Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 20 of 20

Full-Text Articles in Law

A New Cobell: The Need For A Continued Buy-Back Program, Liam C. Conrad Dec 2023

A New Cobell: The Need For A Continued Buy-Back Program, Liam C. Conrad

American Indian Law Journal

The General Allotment Act of 1887 divided Indian reservations into smaller plots for the supposed benefit of individual Indians. Today, these allotments are severely fractionated, with some 160-acre plots having as many as a thousand owners. Since allotment, Congress has repeatedly attempted to solve this problem. However, only the Cobell Land Buy-Back Program has made any sizeable impact on fractionation levels. This paper examines the fractionation problem and the Cobell Program. Now that the Cobell Program has ended in November 2022, this paper argues that Congress must quickly reauthorize a similar program or fractionation will soon exceed pre-Cobell levels.


Constitutionality Of Reparations For Native Americans: Confronting The Boarding Schools, Monica Shaffer Jan 2023

Constitutionality Of Reparations For Native Americans: Confronting The Boarding Schools, Monica Shaffer

Mitchell Hamline Law Review

No abstract provided.


An Unfair Cross Section: Federal Jurisdiction For Indian Country Crimes Dismantles Jury Community Conscience, Alana Paris Dec 2020

An Unfair Cross Section: Federal Jurisdiction For Indian Country Crimes Dismantles Jury Community Conscience, Alana Paris

Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy

Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, federal jury pools must reflect a fair cross section of the community in which a crime is prosecuted and from which no distinct group in the community is excluded. The community in which a crime is prosecuted varies widely in Indian country based on legislative reforms enacted by Congress to strip indigenous populations of their inherent sovereignty. Under the Major Crimes Act, the federal government has the right to adjudicate all serious crimes committed by one American Indian against another American Indian or non-Indian within Indian country. American Indian defendants under …


Aboriginal Rights And Constitutional Conflict: The Marshall Court, State And Federal Sovereignty, And Native American Rights Under The 1789 Constitution, Guy Charlton Dec 2019

Aboriginal Rights And Constitutional Conflict: The Marshall Court, State And Federal Sovereignty, And Native American Rights Under The 1789 Constitution, Guy Charlton

American Indian Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Juliana V. United States, Daniel Brister May 2019

Juliana V. United States, Daniel Brister

Public Land & Resources Law Review

In 2015, a group of adolescents between the ages of eight and nineteen filed a lawsuit against the federal government for infringing upon their civil rights to a healthy, habitable future living environment. Those Plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States alleged that the industrial-scale burning of fossil fuels was causing catastrophic and destabilizing impacts to the global climate, threatening the survival and welfare of present and future generations. Seeking to reduce the United States’ contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide, Plaintiffs demanded injunctive and declaratory relief to halt the federal government’s policies of promoting and subsidizing fossil fuels, due to the …


The Impact Of The Honour Of The Crown On The Ethical Obligations Of Government Lawyers: A Duty Of Honourable Dealing, Andrew Flavelle Martin, Candice Telfer Oct 2018

The Impact Of The Honour Of The Crown On The Ethical Obligations Of Government Lawyers: A Duty Of Honourable Dealing, Andrew Flavelle Martin, Candice Telfer

Dalhousie Law Journal

The honour of the Crown is recognized as a Canadian constitutional principle that is essential to reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadians. As part of the process of reconciliation, this article argues that the honour of the Crown imposes a special ethical obligation on government lawyers in specific circumstances, which we call the duty of honourable dealing. We situate this duty in the divided literature and case law about whether government lawyers have special ethical obligations and in the two dimensions in which the honour of the Crown applies: the Crown as an institution and the Crown as a collection …


Constitutional Realism About Constitutional Protection: Indigenous Rights Under A Judicialized And A Politicized Constitution, Matthew Sr Palmer Apr 2006

Constitutional Realism About Constitutional Protection: Indigenous Rights Under A Judicialized And A Politicized Constitution, Matthew Sr Palmer

Dalhousie Law Journal

This article assesses the comparative effectiveness of constitutional protection of indigenous rights in Canada and New Zealand using a perspective of "constitutional realism". The two constitutions offer a useful contrast of similar systems distinguished by distinctly contrasting directions over the past twentyfive years. The reality of Canadas constitutional development has seen more power accrue to the judicial branch of government. The reality of New Zealand's constitutional development has seen more power accrue to the political branches ofgovernment. The article considers the reality of the behaviour of these branches of government in each jurisdiction in relation to indigenous rights. It finds …


Constitutional Law: Mci Telecommunications Corp. V. Public Service Commission: The Tenth Circuit Rebuffs The Supreme Court Trend Supporting State Immunity, Stephanie Chapman Jan 2002

Constitutional Law: Mci Telecommunications Corp. V. Public Service Commission: The Tenth Circuit Rebuffs The Supreme Court Trend Supporting State Immunity, Stephanie Chapman

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.


Race And The Australian Constitution: From Federation To Reconciliation, George Williams Oct 2000

Race And The Australian Constitution: From Federation To Reconciliation, George Williams

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

The framing of the Australian Constitution initiated a pattern of discrimination against Australia's Indigenous peoples. They were cast as outsiders to the nation brought about in 1901. This pattern was broken in 1967 by the deletion of the discriminatory provisions from the Constitution. Today, there is strong community support in Australia for the reconciliation process, which would involve recognition of Indigenous peoples as an integral and unique component of the Australian nation. However, this has yet to be translated into substantive legal outcomes. The author analyses the interaction of issues of race and the Australian Constitution as it has affected …


The Organic Constitution: Aboriginal Peoples And The Evolution Of Canada, Brian Slattery Jan 1996

The Organic Constitution: Aboriginal Peoples And The Evolution Of Canada, Brian Slattery

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Despite recent advances in the law of aboriginal rights, most Canadian lawyers still tacitly view the Constitution as the outgrowth of European legal traditions, transplanted into North America. This article identifies the main features of this model of the Constitution and proposes a more appropriate model to replace it, one that recognizes the Constitution's deep roots in Canadian history and traditions, and acknowledges the distinctive contributions of Aboriginal peoples and their long-standing relations with the Crown.


Constitutional Law: Congressional Plenary Power Over Indian Affairs--A Doctrine Rooted In Prejudice, Irene K. Harvey Jan 1982

Constitutional Law: Congressional Plenary Power Over Indian Affairs--A Doctrine Rooted In Prejudice, Irene K. Harvey

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Federal Recent Developments Jan 1982

Federal Recent Developments

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments Jan 1980

Recent Developments

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law: Dubious Intrusions--Peynote, Drug Laws, And Religious Freedom, John T. Doyle Jan 1980

Constitutional Law: Dubious Intrusions--Peynote, Drug Laws, And Religious Freedom, John T. Doyle

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments Jan 1978

Recent Developments

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law: Equal Protection: Martinez V. Santa Clara Pueblo--Sexual Equality Under The Indian Civil Rights Act, Andra Pearldaughter Jan 1978

Constitutional Law: Equal Protection: Martinez V. Santa Clara Pueblo--Sexual Equality Under The Indian Civil Rights Act, Andra Pearldaughter

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Recent Developments Jan 1978

Recent Developments

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law: Santa Clara Pueblo V. Martinez: Tribal Membership And The Indian Civil Rights Act, Vieno Lindstrom Jan 1978

Constitutional Law: Santa Clara Pueblo V. Martinez: Tribal Membership And The Indian Civil Rights Act, Vieno Lindstrom

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law: Preserving Native American Cultural And Archeological Artifacts, Robert L. Cooper Jan 1976

Constitutional Law: Preserving Native American Cultural And Archeological Artifacts, Robert L. Cooper

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Law: Freedom Of Religion--Peyote And The Native American Church, George De Verges Jan 1974

Constitutional Law: Freedom Of Religion--Peyote And The Native American Church, George De Verges

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.