Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
- Publication
-
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) (7)
- Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997)) (4)
- Articles (3)
- Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Indian Reservation v. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997)) (1)
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Law
Dedication To Professor Ralph W. Johnson, David H. Getches
Dedication To Professor Ralph W. Johnson, David H. Getches
Articles
This Indian law symposium issue of the Washington Law Review was inspired by the work of Professor Ralph W. Johnson, whose teaching and personal commitment to the field have motivated hundreds, if not thousands, of law students. The decision of the Editorial Board to dedicate the symposium to him might have been made by as many as thirty classes that have passed through the University of Washington School of Law. Those students have been introduced to and moved by Professor Johnson's elucidation of a field that is at once intellectually challenging and morally significant. Johnson's alumni have spread over the …
Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson
Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson
Articles
This article surveys the past and present role of lawyers in the field of Indian law, from the absence of attorneys in early treaty negotiations through the formative role lawyers played in developing the federal trust relationship, to their modem role as "legal warriors" for the increasingly independent, autonomous tribes of today. To understand all the changes now occurring in Indian law, a review of the background is helpful. What follows is a synopsis of the significant events in Indian history, focusing on how the U.S. government initially treated Indians and the role the legal profession played in this treatment.
Reply Brief For Petitioners
Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997))
No abstract provided.
Brief For The United States In Opposition
Brief For The United States In Opposition
Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997))
No abstract provided.
Brief In Opposition For Respondents The Tulalip Tribes, Muckelshoot Tribe, The Nisqually Tribe, The Puyallup Tribe And The Squaxin Island Tribe
Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997))
No abstract provided.
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Duwamish Indian Tribe v. United States, Docket No. 96-1607 (522 U.S. 806 (1997))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Indian Tribes
Reply Brief Of Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Indian Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief For The United States, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
Reply Brief For The United States, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Joint Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Joint Petition For Writ Of Certiorari
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Indian Reservation v. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee State Of Washington
Reply Brief Of Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee State Of Washington
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Intervenors- Defendants/Appellants "Private Owners" And Answering Brief Of Cross-Appellees
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants Adkins, Et Al., And Their Brief In Answer To Plaintiffs' Cross Appeal
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants Puget Sound Shellfish Growers And Opposition Brief To Plaintiffs' Cross-Appeal
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Defendant/Appellant 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners ("Upow")
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Dedication To Professor Ralph W. Johnson, David H. Getches
Dedication To Professor Ralph W. Johnson, David H. Getches
Articles
This Indian law symposium issue of the Washington Law Review was inspired by the work of Professor Ralph W. Johnson, whose teaching and personal commitment to the field have motivated hundreds, if not thousands, of law students. The decision of the Editorial Board to dedicate the symposium to him might have been made by as many as thirty classes that have passed through the University of Washington School of Law. Those students have been introduced to and moved by Professor Johnson's elucidation of a field that is at once intellectually challenging and morally significant. Johnson's alumni have spread over the …