Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appellants' Reply Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Appellee-Plantiff Tribes
Brief Of Appellee-Plantiff Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief Of Appellants Washington Harvest Divers Association
Reply Brief Of Appellants Washington Harvest Divers Association
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
State's Response Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Plaintiff/Appellee Tribes
Brief Of Plaintiff/Appellee Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellant's Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Opening Brief Of Appellants
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 95-35442, 95-35446 (86 F.3d 1499 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Reply Brief For Appellants
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation
Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
Brief For Appellee United States Of America
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee Indian Tribes
Brief For Appellee Indian Tribes
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief
Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee State Of Washington
Brief For Appellee State Of Washington
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellants
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice Rehnquist And The Indian Cases, Ralph W. Johnson, Berrie Martinis
Chief Justice Rehnquist And The Indian Cases, Ralph W. Johnson, Berrie Martinis
Articles
Since his appointment to the United States Supreme Court, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist has guided significant changes m Indian law He has articulated new tests for determining the status of tribes and their powers as sovereign nations. He has voted to disestablish tribes and limit their sovereign powers. He has voted to allow states to exercise jurisdiction over Indian and non-Indian activities and property on reservations.
The articulation of a legal philosophy is generally accepted, expected, and probably necessary for a Supreme Court Justice. At the same time it is instructive to know the views of the members of …
Chief Justice Rehnquist And The Indian Cases, Ralph W. Johnson, Berrie Martinis
Chief Justice Rehnquist And The Indian Cases, Ralph W. Johnson, Berrie Martinis
Articles
Since his appointment to the United States Supreme Court, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist has guided significant changes in Indian law. He has articulated new tests for determining the status of tribes and their powers as sovereign nations. He has voted to disestablish tribes and limit their sovereign powers. He has voted to allow states to exercise jurisdiction over Indian and non-Indian activities and property on reservations.
The articulation of a legal philosophy is generally accepted, expected, and probably necessary for a Supreme Court Justice. At the same time it is instructive to know the views of the members of …