Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Carachuri-Rosendo (2)
- Deportation (2)
- Mellouli (2)
- Moncrieffe (2)
- Padilla (2)
-
- Arizona (1)
- Categorical approach (1)
- Crime (1)
- Criminality (1)
- DACA (1)
- DAPA (1)
- DHS (1)
- Dada (1)
- Due process (1)
- Enforcement discretion (1)
- Good moral character (1)
- Homosexuality (1)
- ICE (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (1)
- Immigration and Naturalization (1)
- Judulang (1)
- Kucana (1)
- Mata (1)
- Mmigration (1)
- Naturalization (1)
- Naturalization standards in the United States (1)
- Nijhawan (1)
- Proportionality (1)
- Prosecutorial discretion (1)
- Rodriguez (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Immigration And Naturalization-Petition For Naturalization-Alien, A Veteran Who Served Honorably In The United States Armed Forces, And Whose Requirements For Citizenship Are Otherwise Eased, Cannot Be Denied Citizenship For Lack Of "Good Moral Character" Solely On The Basis Of His Homosexuality, Walter E. Leggett Jr
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Proportionality Lost? The Rise Of Enforcement-Based Equity In The Deportation System And Its Limitations, Jason A. Cade
Proportionality Lost? The Rise Of Enforcement-Based Equity In The Deportation System And Its Limitations, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
This article briefly explains and critiques the legal framework that has made enforcement discretion the primary means of injecting proportionality and fairness into the modern deportation system. The article provides an overview of shifting approaches to this enforcement discretion under the Obama and Trump administrations, and describes some of the key Supreme Court jurisprudence interpreting this framework.
Judging Immigration Equity: Deportation And Proportionality In The Supreme Court, Jason A. Cade
Judging Immigration Equity: Deportation And Proportionality In The Supreme Court, Jason A. Cade
Scholarly Works
Though it has not directly said so, the United States Supreme Court cares about proportionality in the deportation system. Or at least it thinks someone in the system should be considering the justifiability of removal decisions. As this Article demonstrates, the Court’s jurisprudence across a range of substantive and procedural challenges over the last fifteen years increases or preserves structural opportunities for equitable balancing at multiple levels in the deportation process. Notably, the Court has endorsed decision makers’ consideration of the normative justifiability of deportation even where noncitizens have a criminal history or lack a formal path to lawful status. …