Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
Necessary Coverage For Authentic Identity: How Bostock Made Title Vii The Strongest Protection Against Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Denial Of Gender-Affirming Medical Care., Jennifer A. Knackert
Necessary Coverage For Authentic Identity: How Bostock Made Title Vii The Strongest Protection Against Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Denial Of Gender-Affirming Medical Care., Jennifer A. Knackert
Marquette Law Review
In June 2020, the United States Supreme Court held that Title VII
protection from discrimination on the basis of sex extended to LGBTQ+
employees. The Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia decision dealt with three
separate cases where LGBTQ+ employees had been fired from their jobs based
on either their sexual orientation or gender identity. While the shared issue in
these cases had to do with employee termination, the textualist argument
presented by the Court leads many legal scholars to believe that the holding
would be applicable to other areas of employment discrimination covered by
Title VII such as employer-sponsored healthcare …