Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Action (1)
- African American (1)
- Animus (1)
- Arrivals (1)
- Black (1)
-
- Boxcar (1)
- Childhood (1)
- DACA (1)
- Deferred (1)
- Divisive (1)
- Dred Scott (1)
- Ferguson (1)
- Human (1)
- Immigrant (1)
- Immigrants (1)
- Immigrate (1)
- Italian (1)
- Japanese (1)
- Jim Crow (1)
- Nationalist (1)
- Nature (1)
- Plessy (1)
- Polish (1)
- Prejudice (1)
- Race (1)
- Racially (1)
- Racist (1)
- Separate-but-equal (1)
- Stigmatize (1)
- Stigmatized (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reconsidering Selective Conscientious Objection, Andrew J. Haile
Reconsidering Selective Conscientious Objection, Andrew J. Haile
University of Richmond Law Review
In 1971, in the midst of the Vietnam War, the United States Supreme Court decided that to qualify as a conscientious objector (“CO”) one must oppose all war, and not just a particular war. The Court’s decision in Gillette v. United States turned on its interpretation of section 6(j) of the Military Selective Service Act. Section 6(j) provided, in relevant part, that no person shall “be subject to combatant training and service in the armed forces of the United States who, by reason of religious training and belief, is conscientiously opposed to participation in war in any form.” According to …
Separate But (Un)Equal: Why Institutionalized Anti-Racism Is The Answer To The Never-Ending Cycle Of Plessy V. Ferguson, Maureen Johnson
Separate But (Un)Equal: Why Institutionalized Anti-Racism Is The Answer To The Never-Ending Cycle Of Plessy V. Ferguson, Maureen Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.