Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
15th Annual Forum On Affordable Housing & Community Development Law: 2006 Michael Scher Award Given To William C. Kelly, Nestor M. Davidson, Leonard A. Zax
15th Annual Forum On Affordable Housing & Community Development Law: 2006 Michael Scher Award Given To William C. Kelly, Nestor M. Davidson, Leonard A. Zax
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Shattering The Myth Of Municipal Impotence: The Authority Of Local Government To Create Affordable Housing, John R. Nolon
Shattering The Myth Of Municipal Impotence: The Authority Of Local Government To Create Affordable Housing, John R. Nolon
Fordham Urban Law Journal
In the absence of any guidance from the legislature, local officials, in confronting the problem of affordable housing, look to the courts to define the extent of their responsibility and power. While not providing specific direction, the New York Court of Appeals has clearly outlawed zoning designed to exclude affordable housing. The judiciary has voiced doubts, however, that municipal governments can, through zoning alone, require the development of affordable housing. The view that municipalities lack such power is erroneous. Zoning alone is competent to induce such development. Furthermore, local governments have considerable additional power to induce the creation of such …
New York City's J-51 Program: Controversy And Revision, Debra S. Vorsanger
New York City's J-51 Program: Controversy And Revision, Debra S. Vorsanger
Fordham Urban Law Journal
New York City administers a real estate tax incentive program, called the J-51 program, for eligible building owners who rehabilitate existing structures. Despite the need for such a program, various problems and abuses arose, emphasizing the need for major reform. Economic conditions changed the housing market and the tax incentives demonstrated several deleterious effects which contravene the original legislative intent of the program. After long negotiations surrounding several competing arguments, reforms were made. The current revisions were necessary to correct the abuses and to return the program to its original purpose of providing adequate housing for moderate and lower income …