Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Silence Is Golden . . . Except In Health Care Philanthropy, Stacey A. Tovino
Silence Is Golden . . . Except In Health Care Philanthropy, Stacey A. Tovino
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Embryo “Adoption”? The Rhetoric, The Law, And The Legal Consequences, Polina M. Dostalik
Embryo “Adoption”? The Rhetoric, The Law, And The Legal Consequences, Polina M. Dostalik
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Perspectives On Financial Incentives To Induce Live Donor Kidney Donation: Scholarships In Exchange For The Gift Of Life, Walter K. Graham, Jason P. Livingston
Perspectives On Financial Incentives To Induce Live Donor Kidney Donation: Scholarships In Exchange For The Gift Of Life, Walter K. Graham, Jason P. Livingston
Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy
No abstract provided.
Revealing Your Sources: The Case For Non-Anonymous Gamete Donation, Michelle Dennison
Revealing Your Sources: The Case For Non-Anonymous Gamete Donation, Michelle Dennison
Journal of Law and Health
This article argues that both legislating the end of anonymous gamete donation and allowing current children of anonymous gamete donation the ability to access identifying information about their donors is in the best interests of all parties involved in the donation process. Recipient-parents and donor-conceived children will benefit from having increased access to their donor's health information. Records access, including access to a donor's identifying information, will help donor-conceived children avoid potential incest and what is sometimes termed in adoption cases "genealogical bewilderment." Finally, banning anonymous donation will give potential gamete donors the ability to make a truly informed decision …
Stealing What's Free: Exploring Compensation To Body Parts Sources For Their Contribution To Profitable Biomedical Research, Jo-Anne Yau
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “At first blush, donating body parts in the name of science appears to be a beautiful solution to the problem of scarce body parts for research advancements. But a closer investigation reveals an ugly fact: the philanthropic donors—referred to as “Sources” in this article—are subjected to physical and financial exploitation.
Sources play a crucial and indispensable role in biotechnology. Without human body parts, most medical discoveries would not have been possible. Handsome profits can be derived from successful discoveries. But currently in the United States, when a Source provides body parts for research purposes, the researcher, research foundation, and …