Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- "Baby Doe" (1)
- CAPTA (1)
- Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and Adoption Reform Act of 1978 (1)
- Correctable birth defect (1)
- Critical illness (1)
-
- Critically ill newborns (1)
- Diagnostic methods (1)
- Doctors (1)
- Down's Syndrome (1)
- Drug court (1)
- Drug treatment (1)
- Drug use (1)
- Due process (1)
- Federal government (1)
- Infants (1)
- Judge (1)
- Legal competence (1)
- Medical treatment (1)
- Mentally ill (1)
- Parents (1)
- Patient coercion (1)
- Physicians (1)
- Psychiatric hospitals (1)
- Relapse (1)
- Sentencing (1)
- Substance abuse (1)
- Voluntary patients (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Government As God: An Update On Federal Intervention In The Treatment Of Critically Ill Newborns, Dionne L. Koller
Government As God: An Update On Federal Intervention In The Treatment Of Critically Ill Newborns, Dionne L. Koller
All Faculty Scholarship
Whether a severely impaired or critically ill infant should receive lifesaving, and sometimes extraordinary, medical treatment, or be allowed to die, is hotly debated. The issue initially garnered public attention in 1982, when an infant who was born with Down's Syndrome, “Baby Doe,” was allowed to die from a correctable birth defect. Following this, the federal government took a lead role in determining the fate of critically ill newborns. In the meantime, doctors, philosophers, and others have debated whether federal interference in this area is appropriate.
This essay will bring the reader up to date on the “Baby Doe” issue …
The Benefits Of Voluntary Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitalization: Myth Or Reality?, Donald H. Stone
The Benefits Of Voluntary Inpatient Psychiatric Hospitalization: Myth Or Reality?, Donald H. Stone
All Faculty Scholarship
Throughout the United States, mentally ill persons are confined against their will in psychiatric hospitals as a result of being accused of dangerous behavior. Some are committed involuntarily by a judge after an administrative hearing during which they are afforded legal representation, a right to be present, and important due process protections, including the right to cross-examine witnesses and present one's own witnesses. However, a significant number of individuals, initially confined in psychiatric institutions for allegedly posing a danger to life or safety, never see an impartial judge, lawyer, or even a family member. These mentally ill individuals are not …
Drug Treatment Courts: Evolution, Evaluation, And Future Directions, Gloria Danziger, Jeffrey Kuhn
Drug Treatment Courts: Evolution, Evaluation, And Future Directions, Gloria Danziger, Jeffrey Kuhn
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.