Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accidents (1)
- Bail (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Criminal justice system (1)
-
- Discrimination (1)
- Drug patents (1)
- Early Release Programs (1)
- Genetic Testing (1)
- Genetics of criminal behavior (1)
- Health (1)
- Health Care Reform (1)
- Human in vitro fertilization laws (1)
- Jails (1)
- Medical Care of Prisoners (1)
- Medical care costs (1)
- Mental health laws (1)
- Patent infringement (1)
- Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (1)
- Planned Parenthood v. Casey (505 U.S. 833 (1992)) (1)
- Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (1)
- Preimplantation genetic diagnosis laws (1)
- Prenatal diagnosis laws (1)
- Pretrial Detainees (1)
- Reproductive Rights (1)
- Reproductive Technology (1)
- Reproductive rights (1)
- Right of Privacy (1)
- Roe v. Wade (410 U.S. 113 (1973)) (1)
- Statutory Interpretation (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Jail Health And Early Release Practices, Brandon L. Garrett, Deniz Ariturk, Jessica Carda-Auten, David L. Rosen
Jail Health And Early Release Practices, Brandon L. Garrett, Deniz Ariturk, Jessica Carda-Auten, David L. Rosen
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Local jails in the United States incarcerate millions of people each year. The COVID-19 pandemic made jail health a pressing public health concern nationally, where releasing individuals from jails occurred across the country in order to prevent pandemic spread. But releases also faced substantial resistance and exposed long-standing challenges in delivering adequate healthcare in jail settings. People in jail have substantially higher levels of medical need than individuals in the general population, with large numbers having serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders. Further, overcrowded conditions and poor healthcare standards and delivery make jails harmful to those already-vulnerable people. What …
Thinking Outside The Box: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, In Vitro Fertilization, And Disability Screening In The Wake Of Box V. Planned Parenthood, Christian J. Sorensen
Thinking Outside The Box: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, In Vitro Fertilization, And Disability Screening In The Wake Of Box V. Planned Parenthood, Christian J. Sorensen
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
A circuit split has recently emerged regarding the constitutionality of state laws banning trait-selective abortions, i.e., abortions based on fetal characteristics like disability. Much of the dialogue surrounding trait selection has revolved around whether such abortions are eugenic in nature and whether they could be regulated differently than other forms of abortion—under either Roe and Casey or the post- Roe regime ushered in by Dobbs. However, the same concerns underlying this debate over eugenic abortions apply with equal force to preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) coupled with in vitro fertilization. Because PGD seems certain to be the next battlefield in …
Patent Prophylaxis: Expanding Access To Prep Through 28 U.S.C. § 1498, Jonathan A. Bell
Patent Prophylaxis: Expanding Access To Prep Through 28 U.S.C. § 1498, Jonathan A. Bell
William & Mary Law Review
Part I of this Note details the discovery of Truvada for PrEP [pre-exposure prophylaxis] and the ongoing patent infringement litigation brought by HHS [United States Department of Health and Human Services], discusses the patents currently held by CDC and Gilead, and examines the shortcomings of infringement litigation as a means to expand access to the drug. Part II analyzes the mechanism of march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act and discusses two previously attempted applications for the HIV-management drug ritonavir to demonstrate why march-in rights will always fail to expand access to life-saving medications or reduce costs to consumers. Part III …
Preimplantation Genetic Testing: A Fundamental Right, Julianna S. Swann
Preimplantation Genetic Testing: A Fundamental Right, Julianna S. Swann
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
Unlike many European countries of similar economic, social, scientific, and political advancement, there is virtually no regulation of preimplantation genetic testing in the United States. This Note will explore preimplantation genetic testing and demonstrate that potential parents in the United States have a right to conduct said testing under the umbrella of the fundamental right to privacy. This Note will demonstrate the need for the regulation for preimplantation genetic testing that will comply with the Undue Burden Test set out in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, while acknowledging and supporting the fundamental right of potential parents to conduct testing. This …
Neuroscience And Criminal Justice: Time For A "Copernican Revolution"?, John S. Callender
Neuroscience And Criminal Justice: Time For A "Copernican Revolution"?, John S. Callender
William & Mary Law Review
The main purpose of this Article is to argue for a fundamental change in the conceptual orientation of criminal justice: from one based on concepts such as free will, desert, and moral responsibility, to one based on empirical science. The Article describes research in behavioral genetics, acquired brain injuries, and psychological traumatization in relation to criminality. This research has reached a level of development at which the traditional approach to criminality is no longer tenable and should be discarded. I argue that mental health legislation provides a model that could be adapted and applied to offenders.
An Unfulfilled Promise: Section 1557'S Failure To Effectively Confront Discrimination In Healthcare, Majesta-Doré Legnini
An Unfulfilled Promise: Section 1557'S Failure To Effectively Confront Discrimination In Healthcare, Majesta-Doré Legnini
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
When the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed, it offered a broad promise to provide access to quality care on a nondiscriminatory basis. To achieve nondiscrimination, Congress included Section 1557, which integrated the nondiscrimination protections granted under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments, Section 504, and the Age Discrimination Act. The language of the statute has proved that the section cannot achieve its broad promise. Covering only intentional discrimination and usually interpreted to divide the standard so that intersectional discrimination cannot be redressed, Section 1557 fails to address discrimination in …