Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- And Cosmetics Act (1)
- Congress (1)
- Cosmetics (1)
- Dobbs (1)
-
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (1)
- Drug (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Environmental Protection (1)
- FCA (1)
- FDA (1)
- Food (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Makeup (1)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Public Harm (1)
- Qui Tam (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Roe (1)
- Roe v. Wade (1)
- S.B. 8 (1)
- Safer Beauty Bill Package (1)
- Texas Heartbeat Act (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cosmetic Crisis: The Obsolete Regulatory Framework Of The Ever-Evolving Cosmetic Industry, Isabelle M. Carbajales
Cosmetic Crisis: The Obsolete Regulatory Framework Of The Ever-Evolving Cosmetic Industry, Isabelle M. Carbajales
University of Miami Law Review
Cosmetics only first became regulated after a series of tragic events where users were seriously harmed from the use of cosmetic products. These tragic events prompted legislators to enact the Food, Drug, and Cosmetics Act of 1938. Before then, law makers feared that regulating the cosmetic industry would lower the tone of legislation because they considered the cosmetic industry to be inconsequential. At present, the regulatory system in place to protect vulnerable cosmetic consumers is nearly identical to when it was enacted over eighty-six years ago—even though the cosmetic market looks nothing like it did back then. The consumer base …
“A Solemn Mockery”: Why Texas’S Senate Bill 8 Cannot Be Legitimized Through Comparisons To Qui Tam And Environmental Protection Statutes, Laura Blockman
“A Solemn Mockery”: Why Texas’S Senate Bill 8 Cannot Be Legitimized Through Comparisons To Qui Tam And Environmental Protection Statutes, Laura Blockman
University of Miami Law Review
On September 1, 2021, the Texas Legislature enacted the Texas Heartbeat Act, an anti-abortion statute popularly known as Senate Bill 8 (“S.B. 8”). Although many states passed anti-abortion legislation in 2021, S.B. 8 received national attention due to the law’s unusual enforcement mechanism: S.B. 8 empowers private citizens, not state actors, to sue individuals who perform or aid in the performance of an abortion after a fetal heartbeat is detected.
Unsurprisingly, the authors of S.B. 8 received extreme back- lash from the public, and many academics and legal scholars viewed the law’s private enforcement mechanism as an effort to evade …