Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AIP (1)
- Advance directives (1)
- Article 81 (1)
- Balancing test (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
-
- Casey Marsh (1)
- Coronavirus (1)
- Counsel (1)
- Court evaluator (1)
- DOH (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Doe v. Zucker (1)
- EEOC (1)
- Educational institutions (1)
- Exemptions (1)
- FDA (1)
- FERPA (1)
- Fatscher (1)
- Federal law (1)
- Fishing expedition (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Frivolous claims (1)
- Guardian (1)
- Guardianship (1)
- Guardianship proceedings (1)
- HIPAA (1)
- Immunization (1)
- Incapacitated person (1)
- Individual liberty (1)
- Is There a Fundamental Right to Privacy When an Educational Institution Requires a Student to Disclose Proof of His or Her Vaccination Status? (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Is There A Fundamental Right To Privacy When An Educational Institution Requires A Student To Disclose Proof Of His Or Her Vaccination Status?, Mary D. Fatscher
Is There A Fundamental Right To Privacy When An Educational Institution Requires A Student To Disclose Proof Of His Or Her Vaccination Status?, Mary D. Fatscher
Touro Law Review
In 2020, the coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) dominated the world. Although the public has progressively become more informed about the disease and how to safeguard itself, challenges persist as there is still much unknown. Aside from wearing masks, social distancing, and despite its undetermined consequences, the COVID-19 vaccination has emerged as a primary solution to substantially reducing the incidence and severity of the virus in our country. Many COVID-19 vaccine mandates were initiated once three pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies including Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson received Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).
New York Mental Hygiene Law Article 81 Proceedings: A Proposal To Better Protect The Best Interests Of An Alleged Incapacitated Person, Casey Marsh
Touro Law Review
Guardianship proceedings under New York Mental Hygiene Law Article 81 are intended to protect the personal needs and property management of an alleged incapacitated person. A guardian appointed for a person is responsible for making decisions in line with the best interests and wishes of his or her ward. While guardians serve a very important purpose, the current procedures of guardianship proceedings allow too much room for family members to bring a proceeding without the alleged incapacitated person’s best interests in mind. Often, people bring guardianship proceedings to fish for information on family members or to circumvent a future Surrogate’s …