Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 1 of 1
Full-Text Articles in Law
It's A Mistake: Insurer Cost Cutting, Insurer Liability, And The Lack Of Erisa Preemption Within The Individual Exchanges, Christopher Smith
It's A Mistake: Insurer Cost Cutting, Insurer Liability, And The Lack Of Erisa Preemption Within The Individual Exchanges, Christopher Smith
Cleveland State Law Review
In today’s society, most people receive their health insurance through their employers. If their employment-based insurer engages in cost cutting that leads to patient injury, Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) preemption means that these people have no state tort-based recourse against their insurers. ERISA is a federal statute that regulates employee benefit plans, and the Supreme Court has interpreted the ERISA statute to preempt most beneficiary state tort claims against an employment-based insurer. In other words, even if the insurer, and not the doctor, caused the patient’s harm, the patient with employment-based insurance can only sue their …