Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bathroom access (1)
- Bathroom bill (1)
- Combat positions (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Exclusion of women in the military (1)
-
- Gender identity and bathroom access (1)
- Gender identity law (1)
- Military (1)
- Physical strength rationales (1)
- The bathroom bill (1)
- Trans bathroom access (1)
- Trans law (1)
- Trans rights (1)
- Transgender bathroom access (1)
- Transgender rights (1)
- Transgender rights law (1)
- Women and the military (1)
- Women in combat positions (1)
- Women in the army (1)
- Women in the military (1)
- Women in the navy (1)
- Women officers (1)
- Women soldiers (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Physical-Strength Rationales For De Jure Exclusion Of Women From Military Combat Positions, Maia Goodell
Physical-Strength Rationales For De Jure Exclusion Of Women From Military Combat Positions, Maia Goodell
Seattle University Law Review
Women have been serving in the military in steadily increasing numbers for decades. Nevertheless, the military remains one of the few areas in which the U.S. government decides what roles are open to women based on de jure exclusions. This Article examines the law governing de jure classification, noting that a mere normative belief about women’s proper place in society is an insufficient basis to justify a sex-based exclusion. It then probes the most common rationale advanced in support of the continued de jure exclusion of women: physical strength. The Article examines four problems with the physical strength rationale: (1) …
The Cross-Dressing Case For Bathroom Equality, Jennifer Levi, Daniel Redman
The Cross-Dressing Case For Bathroom Equality, Jennifer Levi, Daniel Redman
Seattle University Law Review
While transgender rights advocates have won many battles in the fight for equality, bathroom discrimination remains a significant obstacle to transgender people’s full participation in society. This Article discusses the reasoning behind the cases that have rejected transgender people’s discrimination claims based on bathroom exclusion. The Article then demonstrates how these arguments mirror the rationales offered by supporters of long-dead, unconstitutional cross-dressing laws. Synthesizing the two bodies of case law, Levi and Redman offer a new way forward for transgender advocates seeking bathroom equality.