Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bodily privacy (1)
- Carpenter v. U.S. (1)
- Carpenter v. United States (1)
- Cell phone (1)
- Cell tower (1)
-
- Chilling effects (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Democracy (1)
- Expectation of privacy (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of movement (1)
- Geofencing (1)
- Government surveillance (1)
- Intellectual privacy (1)
- Location tracking (1)
- Mosaic theory (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Public space (1)
- Search (1)
- Search warrants (1)
- Seizure (1)
- Smartphone (1)
- Third-party doctrine (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Criminal Procedure—Technology In The Modern Era: The Implications Of Carpenter V. United States And The Limits Of The Third-Party Doctrine As To Cell Phone Data Gathered Through Real-Time Tracking, Stingrays, And Cell Tower Dumps, Deepali Lal
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth Amendment Privacy In Public: A Fundamental Theory With Application To Location Tracking, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Fourth Amendment Privacy In Public: A Fundamental Theory With Application To Location Tracking, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Faculty Scholarship
When we walk out our front door, we are in public and other people may look at us. But intuitively, we don’t open ourselves up to unlimited scrutiny just by going outside. We retain some privacy, even in public. What is the source of this residual public-privacy, and how should the law recognize it without degrading the open character of public space?
The answer given by commentators, and most recently by the Supreme Court in Carpenter v. U.S., comes in the form of two related claims. The first is the chilling theory of the Fourth Amendment. According to this idea, …