Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (2)
- African-Americans (1)
- Arrestees (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crime (1)
-
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal wrongdoing (1)
- DNA samples (1)
- DNA testing (1)
- Every reasonable inference (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Ferguson (1)
- Genuine dispute of material fact (1)
- Lethal Force (1)
- Maryland statute (1)
- Maryland v. King (1)
- Plumhoff v. Rickard (1)
- Police (1)
- Primary purpose test (1)
- Pure question of law (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Romo v. Largen (1)
- Rule 56 (1)
- SCOTUS (1)
- Scott v. Harris (1)
- Search and seizure (1)
- Slavery (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Scott V. Harris And The Future Of Summary Judgment, Tobias Barrington Wolff
Scott V. Harris And The Future Of Summary Judgment, Tobias Barrington Wolff
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s decision in Scott v. Harris has quickly become a staple in many Civil Procedure courses, and small wonder. The cinematic high-speed car chase complete with dash-cam video and the Court’s controversial treatment of that video evidence seem tailor-made for classroom discussion. As is often true with instant classics, however, splashy first impressions can mask a more complex state of affairs. At the heart of Scott v. Harris lies the potential for a radical doctrinal reformation: a shift in the core summary judgment standard undertaken to justify a massive expansion of interlocutory appellate jurisdiction in qualified immunity cases. …
From Fugitives To Ferguson: Repairing Historical And Structural Defects In Legally Sanctioned Use Of Deadly Force, José F. Anderson
From Fugitives To Ferguson: Repairing Historical And Structural Defects In Legally Sanctioned Use Of Deadly Force, José F. Anderson
All Faculty Scholarship
The lawful use of lethal force to subdue suspected wrongdoers has a long tradition in our nation. There is certainly nothing wrong with securing, incapacitating, or even killing violent persons who pose a serious threat to the lives of innocent individuals. One of the important roles of government is to protect people from harm and keep the peace. Recent events in Ferguson, Missouri, have highlighted the tension between the officers on the beat and citizens on the street. These tensions are not likely to subside unless there are major structural changes in the way the police do their job and …
Using The Dna Testing Of Arrestees To Reevaluate Fourth Amendment Doctrine, Steven P. Grossman
Using The Dna Testing Of Arrestees To Reevaluate Fourth Amendment Doctrine, Steven P. Grossman
All Faculty Scholarship
With the advent of DNA testing, numerous issues have arisen with regard to obtaining and using evidence developed from such testing. As courts have come to regard DNA testing as a reliable method for linking some people to crimes and for exonerating others, these issues are especially significant. The federal government and most states have enacted statutes that permit or direct the testing of those convicted of at least certain crimes. Courts have almost universally approved such testing, rejecting arguments that obtaining and using such evidence violates the Fourth Amendment.
More recently governments have enacted laws permitting or directing the …