Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Equal protection (18)
- California (6)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Due process (4)
- Due process of law (4)
-
- Sex discrimination (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Fourteenth amendment (3)
- Costs (2)
- Federal jurisdiction (2)
- Gender (2)
- Illegitimacy (2)
- Juvenile offenders (2)
- Public welfare (2)
- Right of privacy (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- Women (2)
- Equal protection (1)
- Juvenile offenders (1)
- Marital property (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Abstention (1)
- Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) (1)
- Administrative Procedure (1)
- Age discrimination (1)
- Armed forces (1)
- Benefits (1)
- Bill of attainder (1)
- Carleson (1)
- Children (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Law
Lis Pendens And Procedural Due Process, William B. Hanley
Lis Pendens And Procedural Due Process, William B. Hanley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Steed V. Imperial Airlines, Clay Plotkin
Equal Protection For Illegitimate Children In State Welfare Programs, Phillip North
Equal Protection For Illegitimate Children In State Welfare Programs, Phillip North
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bilingual Welfare Notice Not Required - Guerrero V. Carleson, 9 Cal. 3d 808, 512 P.2d 833, 109 Cal. Rptr. 201 (1973), Mary Beth Diez
Bilingual Welfare Notice Not Required - Guerrero V. Carleson, 9 Cal. 3d 808, 512 P.2d 833, 109 Cal. Rptr. 201 (1973), Mary Beth Diez
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Illegitimate Children And Constitutional Review, Clayton W. Plotkin, John Vodonick
Illegitimate Children And Constitutional Review, Clayton W. Plotkin, John Vodonick
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Infirmity Of The California Government Claim Statute, James C. Downing, Nikolai Tehin Jr.
The Constitutional Infirmity Of The California Government Claim Statute, James C. Downing, Nikolai Tehin Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Void For Vagueness: State Statutes Proscribing Conduct Only For A Juvenile, Edward R. Roybal
Void For Vagueness: State Statutes Proscribing Conduct Only For A Juvenile, Edward R. Roybal
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
California Garageman's Liens: Procedural Due Process Restored, Len Carafa
California Garageman's Liens: Procedural Due Process Restored, Len Carafa
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
State Recoupment Of The Costs Of Defense Of Indigent Criminal Defendants , Mark M. Horgan
State Recoupment Of The Costs Of Defense Of Indigent Criminal Defendants , Mark M. Horgan
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. Superior Court - The Future Of The Grand Jury Indictment In California , Suzanne Haigh
Johnson V. Superior Court - The Future Of The Grand Jury Indictment In California , Suzanne Haigh
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Murguia V. Municipal Court - The Defense Of Discriminatory Prosecution, Jeffrey L. Garland
Murguia V. Municipal Court - The Defense Of Discriminatory Prosecution, Jeffrey L. Garland
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Presentence Custody Time Credit Under California Penal Code Section 2900.5, James D. Robinson
Presentence Custody Time Credit Under California Penal Code Section 2900.5, James D. Robinson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Massachusetts Board Of Retirement V. Murgia: A Fifty Year Old Policeman And Traditional Equal Protection Analysis: Are They Both Past Their Prime?, William David Evans
Massachusetts Board Of Retirement V. Murgia: A Fifty Year Old Policeman And Traditional Equal Protection Analysis: Are They Both Past Their Prime?, William David Evans
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
People V. Olivas: Equalizing The Sentencing Of Youthful Offenders With Adult Maximums, William E. Harris
People V. Olivas: Equalizing The Sentencing Of Youthful Offenders With Adult Maximums, William E. Harris
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Application Of The Abstention Doctrine To Inverse Condemnation Actions In Federal Court , John T. Harris
Application Of The Abstention Doctrine To Inverse Condemnation Actions In Federal Court , John T. Harris
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process In The Discipline Of Incarcerated Juveniles, Allen F. Breed, Paul H. Voss
Procedural Due Process In The Discipline Of Incarcerated Juveniles, Allen F. Breed, Paul H. Voss
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Ohio: The Emergence Of The Right Of Family Choice In Zoning, Margaret Anne Macfarlane
Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Ohio: The Emergence Of The Right Of Family Choice In Zoning, Margaret Anne Macfarlane
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Goss To Bishop: The Demise Of The Entitlement Doctrine, Scott H. Racine, Stephen J. Spinello
From Goss To Bishop: The Demise Of The Entitlement Doctrine, Scott H. Racine, Stephen J. Spinello
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection For Unmarried Cohabitors: An Insider's Look At Marvin V. Marvin , Marvin M. Mitchelson, William J. Glucksman
Equal Protection For Unmarried Cohabitors: An Insider's Look At Marvin V. Marvin , Marvin M. Mitchelson, William J. Glucksman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Justice And The Equal Protection Clause: First Class, Tourist, Or Luxury Coach, James M. Mcgoldrick
Juvenile Justice And The Equal Protection Clause: First Class, Tourist, Or Luxury Coach, James M. Mcgoldrick
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Bank Of Boston V. Bellottii, Corporations Right To Political Speech, Paul J. Zwier
First Bank Of Boston V. Bellottii, Corporations Right To Political Speech, Paul J. Zwier
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Security For Costs Requirement In California - A Violation Of Procedural Due Process?, Jerel L. Ellington
The Security For Costs Requirement In California - A Violation Of Procedural Due Process?, Jerel L. Ellington
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mackey V. Montrym: Clarification On A Matter Of Timing , Alan J. Cohen
Mackey V. Montrym: Clarification On A Matter Of Timing , Alan J. Cohen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Harris V. Mcrae: Whatever Happened To The Roe V. Wade Abortion Right?, Laura Crocker
Harris V. Mcrae: Whatever Happened To The Roe V. Wade Abortion Right?, Laura Crocker
Pepperdine Law Review
The controversial Roe v. Wade decision purportedly removed the abortion controversy from the political arena and set constitutional standards by which questions on the issue could be resolved. The enactment of the Hyde Amendment, a bill which generally forbids the use of Medicaid funds for abortions, was a recent political response to the abortion controversy. However, in the recent case of Harris v. McRae, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment and thus injected the abortion controversy back into the political arena. The author exhaustively examines the abortion controversy from the time of the Roe decision up …
Rostker V. Goldberg: A Step Backward In Equal Protection, Or A Justifiable Affirmation Of Congressional Power?, Gilbert L. Purcell, Janet Rappaport
Rostker V. Goldberg: A Step Backward In Equal Protection, Or A Justifiable Affirmation Of Congressional Power?, Gilbert L. Purcell, Janet Rappaport
Pepperdine Law Review
The Supreme Court in Rostker v. Goldberg upheld a Congressional decision which excluded women from registration for service in the Armed Forces of the United States. Although the case was brought based upon equal protection grounds, the majority took a separation of powers stance and based its decision upon the fact that the Court has traditionally granted deference to the decisions of Congress in the area of military affairs. The minority opinions disagreed with the majority's analysis and claimed that the central issue in Rostker was not military in nature, but was that Congress' plan to register males only, promoted …
Wengler V. Druggists' Mutual Insurance Company: No More Skirting The Issue Of Sex Discrimination In Workers' Compensation Dependency Statutes, Teresa A. Saggese, Lawson A. Cox Ii
Wengler V. Druggists' Mutual Insurance Company: No More Skirting The Issue Of Sex Discrimination In Workers' Compensation Dependency Statutes, Teresa A. Saggese, Lawson A. Cox Ii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Stevens And The Emerging Law Of Sex Discrimination , John P. Wagner
Justice Stevens And The Emerging Law Of Sex Discrimination , John P. Wagner
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Continues Its Journey Down The Ever Narrowing Paths Of Section 1983 And The Due Process Clause: An Analysis Of Parratt V. Taylor, Robert E. Palmer
The Supreme Court Continues Its Journey Down The Ever Narrowing Paths Of Section 1983 And The Due Process Clause: An Analysis Of Parratt V. Taylor, Robert E. Palmer
Pepperdine Law Review
After nearly a century of quiet slumber, the Supreme Court awoke the sleeping giant. In the past two decades, 42 U.S.C. §1983 has evolved into a judicial Frankenstein monster. Unable to control the beast, the Court has attempted to restrict the creature's movements by unnecessarily limiting its constitutional source. If followed to its logical conclusion, the Court's narrow reading of the Constitution may ultimately demote all due process violations to state tort remedies. This note traces the legislative and judicial evolution of section 1983 as well as the statute's present interaction with the due process clause. The vehicle for this …
Constitutional Considerations: Government Responsibility And The Right Not To Be A Victim , Richard L. Aynes
Constitutional Considerations: Government Responsibility And The Right Not To Be A Victim , Richard L. Aynes
Pepperdine Law Review
Within a democratic society, citizens are provided with certain rights and liberties. Among those rights and liberties is the right not to be a victim. In this article, the author examines and analyzes the growing concern for the protection of victims of crimes. Recent legislative enactments have been designed to alter the role of the victim in the civil and criminal justice systems by defining and implementing a series of "victims' rights." The author concludes by recognizing that one of the most important duties of government is to provide for the physical safety of those within its jurisdiction. To implement …
Reinforcement Of Middle Level Review Regarding Gender Classifications: Mississippi University For Women V. Hogan , Mary Ellen Shull
Reinforcement Of Middle Level Review Regarding Gender Classifications: Mississippi University For Women V. Hogan , Mary Ellen Shull
Pepperdine Law Review
In Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, the United States Supreme Court was presented with an equal protection challenge initiated by a male who was denied admission to a state-supported all-female school of nursing. After a review of relevant decisions in this area, the author examines the Supreme Court's intermediate level of scrutiny analysis and argues that application of a higher level of scrutiny to gender-based classifications is a prerequisite to true equality between the sexes.