Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Alimony For Men -- The Changing Law, Pamela Joy Smith
Alimony For Men -- The Changing Law, Pamela Joy Smith
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unwed Father: Conflict Of Rights In Adoption Proceedings, Winston R. Davis
The Unwed Father: Conflict Of Rights In Adoption Proceedings, Winston R. Davis
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 97 S. Ct. 555 (1977), Karen K. Kinkennon
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 97 S. Ct. 555 (1977), Karen K. Kinkennon
Florida State University Law Review
Zoning- DISCRIMINATORY INTENT MUST BE PROVED BEFORE COURTS MAY REACH FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUES.
Spooner V. Askew, 345 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1976), Charles A. Johnson
Spooner V. Askew, 345 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1976), Charles A. Johnson
Florida State University Law Review
Ad Valorem Taxation- RATIFICATION OF FLORIDA'S AD VALOREM TAX STRUCTURE: REJECTION OF AN EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGE.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, 95 S. Ct. 1225 (1975), Barbara Cozad Biddle
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, 95 S. Ct. 1225 (1975), Barbara Cozad Biddle
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law- EQUAL PROTECTION- DENYING SOCIAL SECURITY "MOTHER'S INSURANCE BENEFITS" TO FATHERS VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION COMPONENT OF FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE.
Niles V. Niles, 299 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1974), C. Anthony Cleveland
Niles V. Niles, 299 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1974), C. Anthony Cleveland
Florida State University Law Review
Child Custody- INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE MAY BE CONSIDERED IN FRAMING CUSTODY MODIFICATION ORDERS.
Ortwein V. Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973), Florida State University Law Review
Ortwein V. Schwab, 410 U.S. 656 (1973), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT-REQUIREMENT OF FILING FEE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE REDUCTION OF WELFARE BENEFITS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW.