Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Courts (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Atkins v. virginia (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
-
- Constitutional law (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Cruel and unusual punishment (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Democracy (1)
- Due process (1)
- Eighth amendment (1)
- Fourteenth amendment (1)
- Hall v. florida (1)
- Intellectual disability (1)
- Judges (1)
- Justice scalia (1)
- Living constitution (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Originialism (1)
- Warren hill (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hall V. Florida: The Death Of Georgia's Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Standard, Adam Lamparello
Hall V. Florida: The Death Of Georgia's Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Standard, Adam Lamparello
Adam Lamparello
Welcome: We’re Glad Georgia is On Your Mind.
Georgia is on many minds as Warren Hill prepares for a state court hearing to once again begin the process of trying to show that he is intellectually disabled. As Warren Hill continues to flirt with death, one must ask, is Georgia really going to execute someone that nine experts and a lower court twice found to be mentally retarded? The answer is yes, and the Georgia courts do not understand why we are scratching our heads. The answer is simple: executing an intellectually disabled man is akin to strapping a ten-year …
It's The Constitution, Stupid: Two Liberals Pay Tribute To Antonin Scalia's Legacy, Adam Lamparello, Charles Maclean
It's The Constitution, Stupid: Two Liberals Pay Tribute To Antonin Scalia's Legacy, Adam Lamparello, Charles Maclean
Adam Lamparello
Living constitutionalism may achieve “good” results, but with each Roe v. Wade, and Bush v. Gore, the Constitution’s vision takes more shallow breaths, and democracy fades into elitism’s shadow. The debate over constitutional interpretation is, in many ways, reducible to this question: if a particular outcome is desirable, and the Constitution’s text is silent or ambiguous, should the United States Supreme Court (or any court) disregard constitutional constraints to achieve that outcome? If the answer is yes, nine unelected judges have the power to choose outcomes that are desirable. If the answer is no, then the focus must be on …
The Separate But Unequal Constitution, Adam Lamparello, Charles E. Maclean
The Separate But Unequal Constitution, Adam Lamparello, Charles E. Maclean
Adam Lamparello
The Constitution should not be a political chess match, and outcomes should not depend on the composition of the Supreme Court. The text’s written and unwritten mandates speak to a single value that should unite jurists of all interpretive persuasions: the people — not legislatures or courts — own the Constitution’s enumerated rights, and have a corresponding right to define those that are not enumerated. But those rights have not been fully realized because the Constitution has been applied in a separate — and unequal — manner.
The wealthy have increased access to the political process, the poor are disproportionately …