Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Fda And The Rise Of The Empowered Consumer, Lewis Grossman May 2013

Fda And The Rise Of The Empowered Consumer, Lewis Grossman

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

This Article traces the still-evolving view of consumers of FDA-regulated products as capable, rational, and rights-bearing decision makers. It also examines the corresponding diminution of FDA’s role as a paternalistic gatekeeper collaborating with medical and scientific experts to prevent products and manufacturer-provided information from reaching the public. Compared with their 1960s counterparts, today’s consumers of food and drugs have far greater freedom to make unmediated choices among a wider variety of products, guided by a relative deluge of labeling and advertising information. Moreover, food and drug regulation, once the exclusive domain of bureaucrats and experts, has become a focus of …


California Expands Tort Liability Under The Novel Market Share Theory: Sindell V. Abbott Laboratories, N. Denise Taylor Feb 2013

California Expands Tort Liability Under The Novel Market Share Theory: Sindell V. Abbott Laboratories, N. Denise Taylor

Pepperdine Law Review

The California Supreme Court, in the novel and unprecedented case of Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, eliminated the plaintiffs burden of identification of a negligent party, and thus the causation requirement, in a multiple party tort action. In the course of this decision, the court adopted the "market share" theory of liability which dictated in Sindell that nonidentifiable defendant-manufacturers of the generic drug DES would be liable for the damages in proportion to their share of business in the market. The author thoroughly examines various theories of recovery, such as "alternative liability," "concert of action" and "enterprise liability," which the court …


Implications Of The Supreme Court's Decision In Pliva, Inc. V. Mensing: Why Generic And Brand-Name Pharmaceuticals Must Be Treated Equally Under The Federal Food, Drug, And Cosmetic Act Jan 2013

Implications Of The Supreme Court's Decision In Pliva, Inc. V. Mensing: Why Generic And Brand-Name Pharmaceuticals Must Be Treated Equally Under The Federal Food, Drug, And Cosmetic Act

Marquette Elder's Advisor

No abstract provided.