Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Restraining False Light: Constitutional And Common Law Limits On A "Troublesome Tort", James B. Lake
Restraining False Light: Constitutional And Common Law Limits On A "Troublesome Tort", James B. Lake
Federal Communications Law Journal
The defamation tort is the common law's established remedy for false speech that causes reputational and emotional injury. That tort is subject to intricate constitutional, legislative, and common law rules that have evolved over decades. The false light invasion of privacy tort also provides a potential cause of action in response to injurious falsehood. False light, however, has been subject to much less judicial and legislative scrutiny than defamation. As a result, courts often are uncertain about the proper limits on false light and, in some cases, have countenanced false light claims that would have failed if filed as defamation …
Beyond Content Neutrality: Understanding Content-Based Promotion Of Democratic Speech, Marvin Ammori
Beyond Content Neutrality: Understanding Content-Based Promotion Of Democratic Speech, Marvin Ammori
Federal Communications Law Journal
Scholars and judges generally assume that the cornerstone of free speech doctrine is the distinction between content-based and content-neutral laws. Despite its wide acceptance, the distinction lacks any precedential or normative basis, unless it also accounts for another equally important distinction. The scholars' conventional view of content-analysis overlooks the difference between the government banning a book or recommending it. Content-based laws that suppress specific content, like banning a television show, should be problematic, but content-based laws that promote specific content, such as promoting educational and political shows, should not be.
Precedent and the First Amendment's underlying normative concerns both require …