Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (24)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (14)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- UIC School of Law (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (5)
- University of the Pacific (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Mercer University School of Law (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Selected Works (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (38)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (20)
- Free speech (11)
- First amendment (9)
- Freedom of speech (9)
-
- Constitutional Law (7)
- Religion (7)
- Church and State (6)
- Constitutional law (6)
- Establishment clause (5)
- Freedom of Religion (5)
- Free Speech (4)
- Freedom of Expression (4)
- Freedom of Speech (4)
- Garcetti v. Ceballos (4)
- Government speech (4)
- Privacy (4)
- Public employees (4)
- Public schools (4)
- Censorship (3)
- Children (3)
- Civil Rights (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Equal Protection (3)
- Establishment Clause (3)
- Freedom of the Press (3)
- Academic Freedom (2)
- Academic freedom (2)
- Attorney Speech (2)
- Barnette (2)
- Publication
-
- First Amendment Law Review (14)
- Popular Media (12)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (11)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (8)
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- McGeorge Law Review (5)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (4)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Articles (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Mercer Law Review (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Publications (3)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- UIC Law Review (3)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (3)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Florida A & M University Law Review (2)
- Jan L Jacobowitz (2)
- Kentucky Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Maryland Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (2)
- Montana Law Review (2)
- NULR Online (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 159
Full-Text Articles in Law
Giving Dissenters Back Their Rights: How The White House Presidential Advance Manual Changes The First Amendment And Standing Debates, Kimberly Albrecht-Taylor
Giving Dissenters Back Their Rights: How The White House Presidential Advance Manual Changes The First Amendment And Standing Debates, Kimberly Albrecht-Taylor
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Long Live The Lie Bill!, Lucila I. Van Dam
Long Live The Lie Bill!, Lucila I. Van Dam
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
What successful defamation plaintiffs typically desire and doctrinally deserve is to have their reputations restored. Presently, however, a plaintiff who has established that she was defamed by the defendant is entitled only to an award of damages, which does nothing to restore reputation. This Note proposes that in addition to a damages award, courts-- if they are to take seriously their obligation to compensate the plaintiff-- should order the defendant to retract the defamatory statement. Contrary to the prevailing view, this Note argues that the proposed retraction order does not jeopardize the First Amendment guarantee of free expression.
Leave Me Alone! The Delicate Balance Of Privacy And Commercial Speech In The Evolving Do-Not-Call Registry, Andrew L. Sullivant
Leave Me Alone! The Delicate Balance Of Privacy And Commercial Speech In The Evolving Do-Not-Call Registry, Andrew L. Sullivant
Federal Communications Law Journal
In 2004, the Tenth Circuit held that although the newly enacted do-not-call registry restricted commercial speech, the restriction was narrowly tailored and thus fell within the bounds of the Constitution. Since that decision, the Federal Trade Commission has amended the do-not-call registry to abolish the provision that required individuals to re-register every five years, and in 2008, Congress passed the amendment. This Note argues that the five-year reregistration requirement is a substantial factor in the registry's narrow tailoring. By removing the requirement, questions as to the restriction's constitutionality reemerge.
"Fleeting Expletives" Are The Tip Of The Iceberg: Fallout From Exposing The Arbitrary And Capricious Nature Of Indecency Regulation, Dave E. Hutchinson
"Fleeting Expletives" Are The Tip Of The Iceberg: Fallout From Exposing The Arbitrary And Capricious Nature Of Indecency Regulation, Dave E. Hutchinson
Federal Communications Law Journal
On November 4, 2008, the Supreme Court heard arguments in FCC v. Fox Television Stations, which centers on whether or the FCC's policy allowing fleeting expletives to be found actionably indecent is arbitrary and capricious. The Second Circuit found that the fleeting expletives policy is arbitrary and capricious as a matter of administrative law. The Supreme Court decision will provide much needed guidance for what constitutes a reasoned basis in the indecency regime's contextual approach. This Note argues that--despite the FCC's recognition that time and context changes the meaning of language-the FCC's indecency regime is at loggerheads with broadcasters because …
Gatekeeping Vs. Balancing In The Constitutional Law Of Elections: Methodological Uncertainty On The High Court, Christopher S. Elmendorf, Edward B. Foley
Gatekeeping Vs. Balancing In The Constitutional Law Of Elections: Methodological Uncertainty On The High Court, Christopher S. Elmendorf, Edward B. Foley
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Essay examines the methodological upheaval created by the quartet of constitutional election law cases decided during October Term 2007. Prior to this Term, the ascendant analytic approach called for a threshold characterization of the burden on the plaintiff's rights, which characterization determined whether the court would apply strict scrutiny or lax, rational-basis-like review. The characterization was generally formal in nature. But in light of the Supreme Court's latest decisions, it is now open to a lower court adjudicating a First Amendment or Equal Protection challenge to an election law-absent a Supreme Court precedent squarely on point- (1) to engage …
Four-Factor Disaster: Courts Should Abandon The Circuit Test For Distinguishing Government Speech From Private Speech, Lilia Lim
Washington Law Review
A recent addition to First Amendment jurisprudence, the government-speech doctrine was developed by the Supreme Court to insulate government speech from certain First Amendment challenges. Broadly, the doctrine rests on the notion that when the government speaks for itself, it may say what it wishes. Recently, government entities facing claims of viewpoint discrimination against speech have asserted a government-speech defense, claiming that their viewpoint-based actions were justifiable because they were not regulating private speech but speaking for themselves. Several federal courts deciding these cases have applied a circuit-developed, four-factor test to determine whether the speech at issue was private speech …
The Case For A Constitutional Easement Approach To Permanent Monuments In Traditional Public Forums, Paul E. Mcgreal
The Case For A Constitutional Easement Approach To Permanent Monuments In Traditional Public Forums, Paul E. Mcgreal
NULR Online
No abstract provided.
Election Apparel And The Fashion Police, Timothy Zick
Election Apparel And The Fashion Police, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The University Campus As “Useless Appendage”, Timothy Zick
The University Campus As “Useless Appendage”, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Sanctity Of Polling Places, Timothy Zick
Possession Is Nine Tenths Of The Law: But Who Really Owns A Church's Property In The Wake Of A Religious Split Within A Hierarchical Church?, Meghaan Cecilia Mcelroy
Possession Is Nine Tenths Of The Law: But Who Really Owns A Church's Property In The Wake Of A Religious Split Within A Hierarchical Church?, Meghaan Cecilia Mcelroy
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Clear And Present Internet: Terrorism, Cyberspace, And The First Amendment, Peter Margulies
The Clear And Present Internet: Terrorism, Cyberspace, And The First Amendment, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
The Emerging First Amendment Law Of Managerial Prerogative, Lawrence Rosenthal
Lawrence Rosenthal
In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the Supreme Court, by the narrowest of margins, held that allegations of police perjury made in memoranda to his superiors by Richard Ceballos, a supervisory prosecutor in the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office, were unprotected by the First Amendment because “his expressions were made pursuant to his duties. . . .” The academic reaction to this holding has been harshly negative; scholars argue that the holding will prevent the public from learning of governmental misconduct that is known only to those working within the bowels of the government itself.
This article rejects the scholarly consensus …
Civil Procedure And The Establishment Clause: Exploring The Ministerial Exception, Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, And The Freedom Of The Church, Gregory A. Kalscheur
Civil Procedure And The Establishment Clause: Exploring The Ministerial Exception, Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, And The Freedom Of The Church, Gregory A. Kalscheur
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
What sort of defense is provided by the ministerial exception to employment discrimination claims? The ministerial exception bars civil courts from reviewing the decisions of religious organizations regarding the employment of their ministerial employees. While the exception itself is widely recognized by courts, there is confusion with respect to the proper characterization of the defense provided by the exception: should it be seen as a subject matter jurisdiction defense, or as a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the plaintiff's claim? This Article argues that articulating the right answer to this question of civil procedure is crucial to a proper …
Freedom To Err: The Idea Of Natural Selection In Politics, Schools, And Courts, Paul D. Carrington
Freedom To Err: The Idea Of Natural Selection In Politics, Schools, And Courts, Paul D. Carrington
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Continuing Threshold Test For Free Exercise Claims, Andy G. Olree
The Continuing Threshold Test For Free Exercise Claims, Andy G. Olree
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
When a claimant challenges some governmental law or action under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, courts have long required the claimant to make out a prima facie case that the government has burdened the exercise of the claimant's sincerely held religious beliefs. This requirement has been referred to as the threshold test for free exercise claims, since claimants must make this showing as a threshold matter before courts will proceed to evaluate the burden and the governmental interest at stake under some standard of scrutiny. This Article argues that although the Supreme Court of the United States …
Changing State Laws To Prohibit The Display Of Hangman's Nooses: Tightening The Knot Around The First Amendment?, Allison Barger
Changing State Laws To Prohibit The Display Of Hangman's Nooses: Tightening The Knot Around The First Amendment?, Allison Barger
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The State Of The First Amendment, Timothy Zick
The Fleeting Expletives Case, Timothy Zick
The Press And Preemptive Arrests, Timothy Zick
Meatspaces, Cyberspaces, And (Relative) Expressive Freedom, Timothy Zick
Meatspaces, Cyberspaces, And (Relative) Expressive Freedom, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Expression Elsewhere, Timothy Zick
The Political Conventions And The First Amendment, Timothy Zick
The Political Conventions And The First Amendment, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
The Reaction To Convention Militarization, Timothy Zick
The Reaction To Convention Militarization, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Pole Dancing: The New Pilates?, Timothy Zick
Porn Air, Timothy Zick
Federal Search Commission - Access, Fairness, And Accountability In The Law Of Search, Frank Pasquale, Oren Bracha
Federal Search Commission - Access, Fairness, And Accountability In The Law Of Search, Frank Pasquale, Oren Bracha
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Drafting The Priests Of Our Democracy To Serve The Diplomatic, Informational, Military & Economic Dimensions Of Power, Robin Barnes
Drafting The Priests Of Our Democracy To Serve The Diplomatic, Informational, Military & Economic Dimensions Of Power, Robin Barnes
Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Contents, First Amendment Law Review
Against Legislation: Garcetti V. Ceballos And The Pradox Of Statutory Protection For Public Employees, Ruben J. Garcia
Against Legislation: Garcetti V. Ceballos And The Pradox Of Statutory Protection For Public Employees, Ruben J. Garcia
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.