Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- University of Richmond (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
-
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (7)
- First amendment (7)
- Freedom of speech (7)
- Free speech (4)
- Freedom of the press (4)
-
- Commercial speech (3)
- Establishment clause (3)
- Freedom of Speech (3)
- Boycotts (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Establishment clause (Constitutional law) (2)
- Inc. (2)
- Journalism (2)
- National Labor Relations Act (2)
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (2)
- Private speech (2)
- Public forum doctrine (2)
- Schools (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- 1st Amendment (1)
- 4th Amendment (1)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Adult Entertainment (1)
- Airports (1)
- Alcoholic beverages (1)
- Artistic expression (1)
- Attorney solicitation (1)
- Balancing (1)
- Banned books (1)
- Books (1)
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (7)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Faculty Publications (2)
-
- Florida State University Law Review (2)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Supreme Court Case Files (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 45
Full-Text Articles in Law
The First Amendment And Economic Regulation: Away From A General Theory Of The First Amendment, Steven H. Shiffrin
The First Amendment And Economic Regulation: Away From A General Theory Of The First Amendment, Steven H. Shiffrin
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
The First Amendment And Nonpicketing Labor Publicity Under Section 8(B)(4)(Ii)(B) Of The National Labor Relations Act, Lee Goldman
The First Amendment And Nonpicketing Labor Publicity Under Section 8(B)(4)(Ii)(B) Of The National Labor Relations Act, Lee Goldman
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Article attempts to provide the appropriate constitutional analysis of restrictions on nonpicketing labor publicity. Part II describes the relevant statute and illustrative cases, including the Supreme Court's DeBartolo decision, that have raised but not resolved the first amendment issues concerning nonpicketing labor publicity. The cases focus attention on two restrictions the courts have imposed on nonpicketing labor publicity-the "producer-distributor" and the "for the purpose of" requirements. Part III analyzes the protected status of the nonpicketing labor speech by comparing nonpicketing labor publicity with labor picketing and commercial speech-two areas that bear superficial similarity to nonpicketing labor publicity and that …
Lynch V. Donnelly, Lewis F. Powell Jr
First Amendment Protection Of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation Of Video Games, John E. Sullivan
First Amendment Protection Of Artistic Entertainment: Toward Reasonable Municipal Regulation Of Video Games, John E. Sullivan
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Note proposes that video game software, the driving force of all video game entertainment, is an artistic creation of a video game designer. Because the United States Supreme Court repeatedly has recognized that artistic expression and entertainment are forms of expression that the first amendment protects, video game software deserves first amendment protection. Video game software is the "heart and soul"" of the video game, and first amendment protection, therefore, also should blanket the game itself. Accordingly, free "speech" liberties give video game manufacturers, distributors, and operators a fundamental right to purvey the protected expression; and the public a …
Judge Hand's History: An Analysis Of History And Method In Jaffree V. Board Of School Commissioners Of Mobile County, Michael Kent Curtis
Judge Hand's History: An Analysis Of History And Method In Jaffree V. Board Of School Commissioners Of Mobile County, Michael Kent Curtis
West Virginia Law Review
In Jaffree v. Board of School Commissioners, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama upheld, against a constitutional challenge, teacher led school prayers. In the companion case of Jaffree v. James, the court upheld the Alabama Prayer Law which permitted state sanctioned prayers in public schools. The religious exercises and the Prayer Law were, of course, unconstitutional when viewed in light of decisions of the United States Supreme Court holding that the first amendment erected a wall of separation between church and state. When faced with direct and settled precedent, the lower federal courts generally follow …
Secondary Consumer Picketing, Statutory Interpretation And The First Amendment, Michigan Law Review
Secondary Consumer Picketing, Statutory Interpretation And The First Amendment, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
This Note examines both the statutory and constitutional implications of Safeco and Tree Fruits. It suggests that the confusion surrounding existing Board and court interpretations of section 8(b)(4)(ii)(B) stems from the Supreme Court's failure to assess realistically the impact that consumer picketing has on secondary businesses, as well as the Court's refusal to examine the objectives of unions that resort to secondary picketing.
Cable Franchising And The First Amendment, William E. Lee
Cable Franchising And The First Amendment, William E. Lee
Vanderbilt Law Review
In awarding and regulating cable franchises, cities often extract from cable operators promises and conditions such as access channels in exchange for exclusive use of public rights-of-way. Professor William Lee in this Article argues that this cable franchising process violates the first amendment rights of cable operators. Professor Lee rejects the two rationales for municipal cable regulation by contending that cable is not a natural monopoly in every market and that cable's use of public rights-of-way requires content neutral regulation. The exacting of conditions such as access channels, however, is not content neutral regulation. Furthermore, censorship decisions that municipalities require …
Florida Defamation Law And The First Amendment: Protecting The Reputational Interests Of The Private Individual, Joseph Kent Brown
Florida Defamation Law And The First Amendment: Protecting The Reputational Interests Of The Private Individual, Joseph Kent Brown
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment Right Of Access To Criminal Trials, C. Lyn Peeples
Constitutional Law—First Amendment Right Of Access To Criminal Trials, C. Lyn Peeples
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Soliciting Sophisticates: A Modest Proposal For Attorney Solicitation, Victor P. Filippini Jr.
Soliciting Sophisticates: A Modest Proposal For Attorney Solicitation, Victor P. Filippini Jr.
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Note advocates an amendment to the ethical standards governing attorneys that will permit the personal solicitation for pecuniary gain of sophisticated prospective clients - that is, those persons having general knowledge of their legal needs and the expertise to assess adequately the information and presentation of an attorney. Part I of this Note shows that lawyer solicitation is a form of commercial speech under recent Supreme Court decisions. It also asserts that, though the traditional reasons for banning lawyer solicitation still have some validity, these reasons do not justify prohibiting the solicitation of sophisticated clients. Part II suggests some …
Speech And Law In A Free Society, Michigan Law Review
Speech And Law In A Free Society, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Speech and Law in a Free Society by Franklyn S. Haiman
The First Amendment Reconsidered: New Perspectives On The Meaning Of Freedom Of Speech And Press, Michigan Law Review
The First Amendment Reconsidered: New Perspectives On The Meaning Of Freedom Of Speech And Press, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The First Amendment Reconsidered: New Perspectives on the Meaning of Freedom of Speech and Press edited by Bill F. Chamberlin and Charlene J. Brown
Problems In Giving Obscenity Copyright Protection: Did Jartech And Mitchell Brothers Go Too Far?, Kurt L. Schmalz
Problems In Giving Obscenity Copyright Protection: Did Jartech And Mitchell Brothers Go Too Far?, Kurt L. Schmalz
Vanderbilt Law Review
This Recent Development traces in part II the emergence of the rule that obscenity is not copyrightable. Part III then examines the courts' reasoning in Mitchell Brothers and Jartech and analyzes the impact of these cases on copyright law. Part IV finds that although these courts properly vindicate free expression, they fail to recognize adequately the national policy against obscenity and the inconsistency of affording federal copyright protection to materials that violate federal obscenity laws. Thus, this Recent Development argues that the strong national policy against obscenity, as manifested in federal anti-obscenity statutes, requires courts in some cases to deny …
Note, Content Regulation And The Dimensions Of Free Expression, Steven J. Heyman
Note, Content Regulation And The Dimensions Of Free Expression, Steven J. Heyman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Content Regulation And The First Amendment, Geoffrey R. Stone
Content Regulation And The First Amendment, Geoffrey R. Stone
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Let The Author Beware: The Rejuvenation Of The American Law Of Libel, Rodney A. Smolla
Let The Author Beware: The Rejuvenation Of The American Law Of Libel, Rodney A. Smolla
Scholarly Articles
Not available.
The Origins Of Freedom Of Speech And Press, David S. Bogen
The Origins Of Freedom Of Speech And Press, David S. Bogen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A School Board's Authority Versus A Student's Right To Receive Information, Timothy L. Coggins
A School Board's Authority Versus A Student's Right To Receive Information, Timothy L. Coggins
Law Faculty Publications
This note examines the considerations which led the United States Supreme Court to determine that a school board's authority over the administration of the schools is not absolute if the exercise of this authority violates the constitutional rights of the students. Second. the note explores the development of a student's right to receive information through a school library as a guarantee of the first amendment, a right that cannot be ignored by a school board when the board removes books which it considers to be inappropriate either because of the ideas presented in the books or because of the local …
An Absolutism That Works: Reviving The Original “Clear And Present Danger” Test, 8 S. Ill. U. L.J. 127 (1983), Donald L. Beschle
An Absolutism That Works: Reviving The Original “Clear And Present Danger” Test, 8 S. Ill. U. L.J. 127 (1983), Donald L. Beschle
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
New York V. Ferber, 50 U.S.L.W. 5077 (U.S. July 2, 1982), Eric L. Dauber
New York V. Ferber, 50 U.S.L.W. 5077 (U.S. July 2, 1982), Eric L. Dauber
Florida State University Law Review
Constitutional Law-CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: A NEW EXCEPTION TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Prior Restraint Of Expression Through The Private Search Doctrine, Edward J. Eberle
Prior Restraint Of Expression Through The Private Search Doctrine, Edward J. Eberle
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Free Press/Fair Trial - The Public Has A First Amendment Right Of Access To Pretrial Suppression, Due Process, And Entrapment Hearings, Stephen V. Siana
Constitutional Law - Free Press/Fair Trial - The Public Has A First Amendment Right Of Access To Pretrial Suppression, Due Process, And Entrapment Hearings, Stephen V. Siana
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Liberties: Current Developments In The Seventh Circuit Regarding First Amendment, Procedural Due Process, Employment Discrimination And The Enforcement Of Civil Rights, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Civil Liberties: Current Developments In The Seventh Circuit Regarding First Amendment, Procedural Due Process, Employment Discrimination And The Enforcement Of Civil Rights, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And Licensing Biology Teachers In Creationism, Benjamin W. Emerson
The First Amendment And Licensing Biology Teachers In Creationism, Benjamin W. Emerson
University of Richmond Law Review
The constitutional provisions separating church and state have long provided fertile ground for conflict resulting in often-bitter courtroom battles. From the famous Scopes "monkey trials" of 1927 in which Clarence Darrow eloquently argued for the teaching of Darwin's theory of evolution in the public schools, through the decisions of the sixties, seventies, and eighties banning prayer, the posting of the Ten Commandments, and similar practices, the conflict has finally come full circle, with fundamentalist Christian groups now arguing that the Biblical account of creation should be taught in public schools as scientific theory.
Libel And Slander In Virginia, Thomas E. Spahn
Libel And Slander In Virginia, Thomas E. Spahn
University of Richmond Law Review
The law of libel and slander in Virginia is unsettled. Even defining the terms is difficult. While many states classify libel and slander as separate torts, in Virginia defamation encompasses them both. Moreover, there are two separate definitions of "defamation per se" in Virginia. There are also two types of "malice" which are applicable in defamation actions; and to make matters worse, one type of "malice" which actually is not malice at all is called "actual malice."
The Future Of Defamation In Illinois After Colson V. Steig And Chapski V. The Copley Press, Inc., Rodney A. Smolla, Linda A. Malone
The Future Of Defamation In Illinois After Colson V. Steig And Chapski V. The Copley Press, Inc., Rodney A. Smolla, Linda A. Malone
Scholarly Articles
None available.
The Origins Of Freedom Of Speech And Press, David S. Bogen
The Origins Of Freedom Of Speech And Press, David S. Bogen
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Attack On Categorical Approaches To Freedom Of Speech, Pierre J. Schlag
An Attack On Categorical Approaches To Freedom Of Speech, Pierre J. Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Sedition Of Free Speech, Lee C. Bollinger
The Sedition Of Free Speech, Lee C. Bollinger
Faculty Scholarship
Several years ago, a story appeared in The New York Times which provided a graphic illustration of how the Soviet government manipulates the news about itself. Each year on May Day, the Times reported, the Soviet leadership poses for a photograph while standing atop the Lenin tomb in Red Square. In the year of the Times story, however, the photograph had undergone a number of noticeable alterations as it appeared in the various government-run media outlets. One official had been removed altogether, another had been positioned a bit closer to Brezhnev, some who had not in fact been present were …
Constitutional Law - First Amendment - New York Statute Proscribing Distribution Of Nonobscene Materials Depicting Minors Engaged In Sexual Conduct Does Not Violate The First Amendment Because The Materials Are Outside First Amendment Protection And The Statute Is Not Substantially Overboard, Cynthia A. Jaworski
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.