Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (3)
- Academic freedom (2)
- Freedom of speech (2)
- Roth v. United States (354 U.S. 476 (1957)) (1)
- "Right of Counsel (1)
-
- 1st amendment (1)
- 384 U.S. 11 (1966) (1)
- ABA (1)
- ANPA (1)
- Anti-War Movement (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Book distribution (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Civil Disobedience (1)
- Civil Liberties (1)
- Civil Rights Movement (1)
- Cohen v. Hurley (1)
- College campuses (1)
- College discipline (1)
- Communist propaganda (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Craig v. Harney (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal prosecution (1)
- Customs (1)
- Disbarment (1)
- Due (1)
- Elfbrandt v. Russell (1)
- Employees (1)
- Employers (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Attorneys--Self-Incrimination--The Attorney's Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Disbarment Proceeding, Michigan Law Review
Attorneys--Self-Incrimination--The Attorney's Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In A Disbarment Proceeding, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A state court has jurisdiction to deal with the alleged misconduct of attorneys practicing before it either explicitly by statute or by ' virtue of its power to control the conduct of its own affairs. Indeed, it can suspend or disbar an attorney who fails to maintain the standard of conduct established for members of the legal profession. One aspect of such a standard is that an attorney is bound not to obstruct the administration of justice, a duty which imposes upon him an affirmative obligation to cooperate with the courts. The question frequently arises whether, in order to satisfy …
Constitutional And Related Public Law Issues In The 1965 Term Of The Supreme Court
Constitutional And Related Public Law Issues In The 1965 Term Of The Supreme Court
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Conscientious Objector And The First Amendment: There But For The Grace Of God . . ., John Henry Schlegel
The Conscientious Objector And The First Amendment: There But For The Grace Of God . . ., John Henry Schlegel
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
The Roth Test And Its Corollaries, Bradford Coupe
The Roth Test And Its Corollaries, Bradford Coupe
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And The Suppression Of Warmongering Propaganda In The United States: Comments And Footnotes, William W. Van Alstyne
The First Amendment And The Suppression Of Warmongering Propaganda In The United States: Comments And Footnotes, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
In an attempt to determine how the First Amendment may protect speakers’ rights to make inflammatory statements calling for violence against a sovereign, this article breaks down this larger question into three categories based on the speaker: the government, foreigners abroad, or American citizens.
Developments In The Law Of Libel: Impact Of The New York Times Rules, Arthur B. Hanson
Developments In The Law Of Libel: Impact Of The New York Times Rules, Arthur B. Hanson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Compelled Medical Aid V. Religious Freedom
Compelled Medical Aid V. Religious Freedom
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Libel And Slander--The Innocent Construction Rule, Ellen Fairfax Warder
Libel And Slander--The Innocent Construction Rule, Ellen Fairfax Warder
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Finance Cases, Jethro K. Lieberman
The Right Of Protest And Civil Disobedience, Harrop A. Freeman
The Right Of Protest And Civil Disobedience, Harrop A. Freeman
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Note On Elfbrandt V. Russell And Loyalty Oaths, Jethro K. Lieberman
Note On Elfbrandt V. Russell And Loyalty Oaths, Jethro K. Lieberman
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Fair Trial - Free Press, M. Ray Doubles
Fair Trial - Free Press, M. Ray Doubles
University of Richmond Law Review
Blazing headlines such as these, followed by detailed accounts of the crime given to newspaper reporters by the police, and opinions of the accused's guilt expressed by prosecuting attorneys, or alleged confessions of the accused with an account of his previous criminal record, have been the basis of many recent appellate court reversals of convictions had in trial court criminal cases. The reason assigned: Denial of a fair trial by an impartial jury.
Symposium: Student Rights And Campus Rules, Michael E. Tigar
Symposium: Student Rights And Campus Rules, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Academic Senate Resolution, Robert M. O'Neil
Reflections On The Academic Senate Resolution, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Customs Censorship, Jay A. Sigler
Customs Censorship, Jay A. Sigler
Cleveland State Law Review
The American national government is engaged in a vast program of censorship which includes a wider range of materials than that usually controlled by local government authority. The attention of the courts and the press has been concentrated primarily upon state and local censorship, but federal activity is usually more significant. The federal government has used the postal and customs powers, derived from Article I, Sec. 8 of the Constitution, to regulate both the internal movement of undesirable material and its entry from abroad. The postal power has been treated elsewhere, but the customs power is at least as important …
Elfbrandt V. Russell: The Demise Of The Loyalty Oath, Jerold H. Israel
Elfbrandt V. Russell: The Demise Of The Loyalty Oath, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
In Elfbrandt v. Russell, the Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 decision, declared unconstitutional Arizona's requirement of a loyalty oath from state employees. At first glance, Elfbrandt appears to be just another decision voiding a state loyalty oath on limited grounds relating to the specific language of the particular oath. Yet, several aspects of Mr. Justice Douglas' opinion for the majority suggest that Elfbrandt is really of far greater significance: it may sharply limit the scope and coverage of loyalty oaths generally and, indeed, may presage a ruling invalidating all such oaths. Of course, only the Supreme Court can determine this. …
Authorization Of Involuntary Blood Transfusion For Adult Jehovah's Witness Held Unconstitutional--In Re Brooks' Estate, Michigan Law Review
Authorization Of Involuntary Blood Transfusion For Adult Jehovah's Witness Held Unconstitutional--In Re Brooks' Estate, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Despite serious illness, plaintiff requested, in accordance with her religious beliefs as a Jehovah's Witness, that blood transfusions not be administered to her. Upon the request of her physician and several assistant state's attorneys, a court-appointed guardian was authorized to consent to a blood transfusion for the plaintiff, and a transfusion was administered. On appeal of the court's action to the Supreme Court of Illinois, held, order reversed. The authorization of a blood transfusion for an adult Jehovah's Witness who has only adult children is an unconstitutional interference with the patient's right to the free exercise of her religion.
The North Carolina Speaker Ban Law: A Study In Context, William Bondurant, Richard Gift, Louise Nelson, Brown Patterson, Philip Secor, Locke White
The North Carolina Speaker Ban Law: A Study In Context, William Bondurant, Richard Gift, Louise Nelson, Brown Patterson, Philip Secor, Locke White
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.