Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Academic autonomy (1)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Antiwar protests (1)
- Campus protests (1)
- Campus unrest (1)
-
- Citizenship (1)
- Civil Disobedience (1)
- Damages (1)
- Defamatory (1)
- Derogatory (1)
- Disorder (1)
- Draft induction (1)
- Extremism (1)
- Extrinsic fact (1)
- Facts (1)
- Florida (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Harvard Law Review (1)
- Higher learning (1)
- Judicial authority (1)
- Legal reform (1)
- Libel (1)
- Military draft (1)
- Parochial education (1)
- Per quod (1)
- Public employees (1)
- Public support (1)
- Secularism (1)
- Slander (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Libel Per Quod In Florida, Richard C. Ausness
Libel Per Quod In Florida, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The purpose of this article is to trace the development of the rules of defamation with particular reference to extrinsic fact. A defamatory communication is one that tends to diminish the esteem, respect, good will, or confidence in which a person is held or to excite adverse, derogatory, or unpleasant feelings or opinions against him. To be actionable under the modem law, however, the defendant's statement must be capable of a defamatory meaning in the sense normally understood.
Defamation consists of the separate torts of libel and slander. Historically, these torts evolved independently of each other, and as a result …
What Is "Right" About America, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
What Is "Right" About America, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Powell Speeches
Powell gave this speech at the Leadership Banquet of the Key Club of Thomas Jefferson High School, Richmond, Virginia.
Judicial Overkill: The Campus And The Courts, Robert M. O'Neil
Judicial Overkill: The Campus And The Courts, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
First Amendment "Due Process", Henry Paul Monaghan
First Amendment "Due Process", Henry Paul Monaghan
Faculty Scholarship
A number of recent Supreme Court opinions, primarily in the obscenity area, have fastened strict procedural requirements on governmental action aimed at controlling the exercise of first amendment rights. Professor Monaghan believes that there are two basic principles that can be distilled from these cases: that a judicial body, following an adversary hearing, must decide on the protected character of the speech, and that the judicial determination must either precede or immediately follow any governmental action which restricts speech. The author argues that these two broad principles should limit any governmental activity which affects freedom of speech, no matter how …
Public Employment, Antiwar Protest And Preinduction Review, Robert M. O'Neil
Public Employment, Antiwar Protest And Preinduction Review, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Public Support And The Sectarian University, Walter Gellhorn, Kent Greenawalt
Public Support And The Sectarian University, Walter Gellhorn, Kent Greenawalt
Faculty Scholarship
In mid-1968 we undertook to advise Fordham University concerning steps that might be appropriate to establish its eligibility for public assistance. As part of that task we tried to determine the extent to which present law requires official differentiation between Church-related and other institutions of higher learning. Since the University sought a wholly detached consideration of its legal posture, our conclusions in this article represent our best judgment of the present state of the law and its probable development. We have avoided indicating our own personal position on debatable legal and ethical issues.