Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (36)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (25)
- University of Georgia School of Law (21)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
-
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- University of San Diego (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Massachusetts School of Law (3)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
- University of California, Irvine School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- University of the Pacific (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (36)
- First amendment (23)
- Free speech (19)
- Freedom of speech (18)
- Constitution (10)
-
- Religion (10)
- Supreme Court (9)
- 1st Amendment (8)
- New York (8)
- Privacy (8)
- Touro (8)
- 1st amendment (6)
- Establishment clause (6)
- Freedom of expression (6)
- Law review (6)
- Supreme court (6)
- Due process (5)
- Free Exercise Clause (5)
- Freedom of Speech (5)
- Freedom of religion (5)
- Religious accommodation (5)
- Trial (5)
- Unconstitutional (5)
- United States Constitution 1st Amendment (5)
- Arbitration (4)
- Campaign finance (4)
- Commercial law (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Corporate law (4)
- Court-connected ADR (4)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (36)
- First Amendment Law Review (25)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (11)
- Georgia Law Review (10)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (6)
-
- San Diego Law Review (5)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (3)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (3)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (3)
- Notre Dame Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Law Review (3)
- University of Massachusetts Law Review (3)
- Barry Law Review (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- McGeorge Law Review (2)
- Nevada Law Journal (2)
- Notre Dame Law Review Reflection (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Pace Environmental Law Review (2)
- UC Irvine Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (2)
- Washington Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- American Indian Law Review (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
Articles 1 - 30 of 168
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Gunman’S Paradise: How Louisiana Shields Concealed Handgun Permit Holders While Targeting Free Speech And Why Other States Should Avoid The Same Misfire, Michael J. Lambert
A Gunman’S Paradise: How Louisiana Shields Concealed Handgun Permit Holders While Targeting Free Speech And Why Other States Should Avoid The Same Misfire, Michael J. Lambert
Louisiana Law Review
The article discusses development in the laws for concealed handgun permit in the U.S. Topics discussed include legal history of gun laws in Louisiana, the constitutionality of laws in context of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and various laws banning the permit of handgun in Louisiana.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Watson V. State Commission On Judicial Conduct, Denise Shanley
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Watson V. State Commission On Judicial Conduct, Denise Shanley
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Decisions - 2002 Term, Joel Gora
First Amendment Decisions - 2002 Term, Joel Gora
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, People V. Bull, Randi Schwartz
Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, People V. Bull, Randi Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Legal Definition Of Religion: From Eating Cat Food To White Supremacy, Jane M. Ritter
The Legal Definition Of Religion: From Eating Cat Food To White Supremacy, Jane M. Ritter
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Aba Model Code Revisions And Judicial Campaign Speech: Constitutional And Practical Implications, Howland W. Abramson, Gary Lee
The Aba Model Code Revisions And Judicial Campaign Speech: Constitutional And Practical Implications, Howland W. Abramson, Gary Lee
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
2003-2004 Supreme Court Term: Another Losing Season For The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
2003-2004 Supreme Court Term: Another Losing Season For The First Amendment, Joel M. Gora
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Website Blocked: Filtering Technology In Schools And School Libraries, Jennifer M. Overaa
Website Blocked: Filtering Technology In Schools And School Libraries, Jennifer M. Overaa
School of Information Student Research Journal
This paper investigates the impact of filtering software in K-12 schools and school libraries. The Children's Internet Protection Act, or CIPA, requires that public schools and school libraries use filtering technology in order to receive discounted rates on technology. As a result, nearly all public elementary and secondary schools today use filtering technology. While the provisions of CIPA narrowly define the content to be blocked, filters are often set to block much more than is required. Filtering technology is often ineffective, and many unobjectionable sites end up being blocked, including Web 2.0 sites and tools needed to educate students in …
Protecting The Free Flow Of Information: Federal Shield Laws In The Digital Age, Arielle Giordano
Protecting The Free Flow Of Information: Federal Shield Laws In The Digital Age, Arielle Giordano
CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy (1993-2015)
No abstract provided.
2007 National Lawyer’S Convention The Federalist Society And Its Federalism And Separation Of Powers Practice Groups Present A Panel Debate On Federalism: Religion, Early America And The Fourteenth Amendment, John Eastman, Marci Hamilton, William H. Pryor Jr.
2007 National Lawyer’S Convention The Federalist Society And Its Federalism And Separation Of Powers Practice Groups Present A Panel Debate On Federalism: Religion, Early America And The Fourteenth Amendment, John Eastman, Marci Hamilton, William H. Pryor Jr.
University of Massachusetts Law Review
Transcript of the Federalist Society and its Federalism and Separation of Powers Practice Groups panel debate at the 2007 National Lawyers Convention including panelists Dean John Eastman of Chapman University School of Law, Professor Marci Hamilton of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, and moderated by Hon. William H. Pryor Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
In Impartiality We Trust: A Commentary On Government Aid And Involvement With Religion, Thomas J. Cleary
In Impartiality We Trust: A Commentary On Government Aid And Involvement With Religion, Thomas J. Cleary
University of Massachusetts Law Review
Ultimately, because true neutrality is not possible, nearly all government interaction with religion is to some degree friendly or hostile. One could argue, therefore, that government interaction with religion is inherently friendly or hostile in nature. As a consequence, establishing neutrality as the ideal misses the mark and has produced a swinging pendulum in the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. At one end of its arc the pendulum produces hostility towards religion and at the other end of the arc it produces friendliness towards religion. This is reflected in case law and in both early and modern government practices. Ultimately, the pendulum …
Conscience, Coercion, And The Constitution: Some Thoughts, Dwight G. Duncan
Conscience, Coercion, And The Constitution: Some Thoughts, Dwight G. Duncan
University of Massachusetts Law Review
As a consequence, this article will argue that the most viable constitutional strategy for protecting conscientious objectors is to bracket the question of whether it is religiously motivated. Rather, it will focus simply on the question of whether it is a sincerely held moral conviction, while seeking to expand existing freedom of speech case law under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to maximize protection for people of conscience from being obliged to act contrary to their conscience.
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Qualified Immunity: 1983 Litigation In The Public Employment Context, Erwin Chemerinsky
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Week After, Lawrence K. Karlton
First Amendment Cases In The October 2004 Term, Joel M. Gora
First Amendment Cases In The October 2004 Term, Joel M. Gora
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Collision Course Between The Right Of Publicity And The First Amendment: The Third And Ninth Circuit Find Ea Sports’S Ncaa Football Video Games Infringe Former Student-Athletes Right Of Publicity, Michael Feinberg
Seton Hall Circuit Review
No abstract provided.
Contents, First Amendment Law Review
The First Amendment And Mass Communication, Marvin Ammori
The First Amendment And Mass Communication, Marvin Ammori
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
First Amendment Values For The Internet, Dawn C. Nunziato
First Amendment Values For The Internet, Dawn C. Nunziato
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Conflict Of Visions: How The 21st Century First Amendment Violates The Constitution's First Amendment, Geoffrey A. Manne, R. Ben. Sperry, Tom Struble, Berin Szoka
A Conflict Of Visions: How The 21st Century First Amendment Violates The Constitution's First Amendment, Geoffrey A. Manne, R. Ben. Sperry, Tom Struble, Berin Szoka
First Amendment Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lane V. Franks, Katie Jo Baumgardner
Lane V. Franks, Katie Jo Baumgardner
Notre Dame Law Review Reflection
On June 19, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the scope of public employee free speech with its decision in Lane v. Franks. The Court granted certiorari in order “to resolve discord among the Courts of Appeals as to whether public employees may be fired—or suffer other adverse employment consequences—for providing truthful subpoenaed testimony outside the course of their ordinary job responsibilities.” The unanimous Lane decision, which affirmed in part and reversed in part an opinion by the Eleventh Circuit, held that the First Amendment protects a public employee from retaliatory employer discipline where the employee testifies at trial, pursuant …
Why Distinguish Religion, Legally Speaking?, Winnifred Fallers Sullivan
Why Distinguish Religion, Legally Speaking?, Winnifred Fallers Sullivan
San Diego Law Review
Law professors commonly answer this critique by scholars of religion, as Andrew Koppelman does, with the comment that, after all, any ambiguity in definition only arises in a few cases. Most of the time the reference is obvious, he says. Moreover, he insists, it has worked fine for all those for whom it should work. But that is the problem—its very obviousness. The problems of exclusion are largely invisible. The reference is so obvious to many and so obviously inclusive of those who are deserving that there is no way to have a conversation about it without the conversation devolving …
Religion As A Legal Proxy, Micah Schwartzman
Religion As A Legal Proxy, Micah Schwartzman
San Diego Law Review
In what follows, after briefly summarizing Koppelman’s position, I argue that his view is vulnerable to the charge that using religion as a legal proxy is unfair to those with comparable, but otherwise secular, ethical and moral convictions. Koppelman has, of course, anticipated this objection, but his responses are either ambivalent or insufficient to overcome it. The case for adopting religion as a proxy turns partly on arguments against other potential candidates. In particular, Koppelman rejects the freedom of conscience as a possible substitute. But even if he is right that its coverage is not fully extensive with the category …
Mccutcheon V. Federal Election Commission, Stephen M. Degenaro
Mccutcheon V. Federal Election Commission, Stephen M. Degenaro
Notre Dame Law Review Reflection
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission involved a challenge to limits imposed on the amount a donor may contribute during a single election cycle. In McCutcheon, the Court was presented with the question of whether the aggregate limits placed on contributions to candidate and noncandidate committees either lacked a cognizable constitutional interest or were unconstitutionally too low. In a five to four decision, the Supreme Court held that the aggregate limits on campaign contributions burden substantial First Amendment rights without furthering a permissible government interest.
How Much Autonomy Do You Want?, Maimon Schwarzschild
How Much Autonomy Do You Want?, Maimon Schwarzschild
San Diego Law Review
At root, the questions of special accommodation and religious adjudicatory independence arise most urgently when a government grows in its reach and ambition. After all, if most areas of life, including those that touch on religious life, are left to people’s private arrangement, then not much special accommodation will be necessary. But when government takes control over more and more areas of life, regulating who shall do what and under what rules and conditions, then clashes with one or another religious way of life are almost inevitable. The dispute over government mandates to provide abortive drugs and contraception, in the …
Speak Up: Issue Advocacy In Increasingly Politicized Times, Sally Wagenmaker
Speak Up: Issue Advocacy In Increasingly Politicized Times, Sally Wagenmaker
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
This article first provides a brief primer on current constraints affecting Section 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) organizations' communications within the context of what has become known as “issue advocacy.” It then sets forth the problem of increasing politicization of nonprofits' issue advocacy activities. The article next evaluates related constitutional tensions for politically tinged issue advocacy, through the lens of the Supreme Court's free speech decisions. It concludes by addressing how the IRS's different content-based standards for issue advocacy are susceptible to abuse, are otherwise constitutionally suspect, and therefore warrant reform.
City Court, City Of Rochester, People V. Barton, Kerri Grzymala
City Court, City Of Rochester, People V. Barton, Kerri Grzymala
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Court, New York County, People V. James, Nicole Compas
Criminal Court, New York County, People V. James, Nicole Compas
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department, For The People Theatres Of New York, Inc. V. City Of New York, Daphne Vlcek
Appellate Division, First Department, For The People Theatres Of New York, Inc. V. City Of New York, Daphne Vlcek
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Courtroom Television Network, Llc V. New York, Courtney Weinberger
Court Of Appeals Of New York, Courtroom Television Network, Llc V. New York, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.