Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (3)
- Free speech (2)
- Abortifacient (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Art (1)
-
- Birth control (1)
- Book (1)
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association (1)
- Burwell (1)
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (1)
- Cartoon(s) (1)
- Censor (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Cheerleader case (1)
- Communications Decency Act's Good Samaritan provision (1)
- Confederacy (1)
- Content-based (1)
- Contraception (1)
- Contraceptive mandate (1)
- Cultural heritage (1)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Deference (1)
- Department of Health and Human Services regulation (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Federal Rule of Evidence 702 (1)
- First amendment (1)
- Hobby Lobby (1)
- Incarcerated (1)
- Inmates (1)
- Internet (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Outside Tinker’S Reach: An Examination Of Mahanoy Area School District V. B. L. And Its Implications, Michelle Hunt
Outside Tinker’S Reach: An Examination Of Mahanoy Area School District V. B. L. And Its Implications, Michelle Hunt
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
In the 1969 landmark case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the Supreme Court reassured students that they do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” Ever since then, the exact scope of students’ free speech rights has been unclear, but the high court has used Tinker’s substantial disruption test to clarify its scope in successive legal challenges. In 2017, B. L., a Mahanoy Area School District student, was suspended from her cheerleading team after using vulgar language off-campus that made its way back to her coaches. She …
Long-Term Preservation Of Public Art: From Cultural Heritage To The Confederacy, Maliha Ikram
Long-Term Preservation Of Public Art: From Cultural Heritage To The Confederacy, Maliha Ikram
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
The Terrorist's Veto: Why The First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals Of The Prophet Muhammad, Daniel Ortner
The Terrorist's Veto: Why The First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals Of The Prophet Muhammad, Daniel Ortner
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Fighting Back Against Revenge Porn: A Legislative Solution, Alex Jacobs
Fighting Back Against Revenge Porn: A Legislative Solution, Alex Jacobs
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
When Religious Belief Becomes Scientific Opinion: Burwell V. Hobby Lobby And The Unraveling Of Federal Rule 702, Meredith Rachel Mandell
When Religious Belief Becomes Scientific Opinion: Burwell V. Hobby Lobby And The Unraveling Of Federal Rule 702, Meredith Rachel Mandell
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
No abstract provided.
Big Censorship In The Big House—A Quarter-Century After Turner V. Safley: Muting Movies, Music & Books Behind Bars, Clay Calvert, Kara Carnley Murrhee
Big Censorship In The Big House—A Quarter-Century After Turner V. Safley: Muting Movies, Music & Books Behind Bars, Clay Calvert, Kara Carnley Murrhee
Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy
On the twenty-fifth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Turner v. Safley, this Article examines how federal courts across the country are applying the Turner standard today in cases involving the First Amendment free speech rights of inmates. Are courts too quick today to support the censorial proclivities of prison officials? Do judges too readily capitulate in deference to the concerns of those tasked with overseeing the incarcerated? Those are the key questions this Article addresses by analyzing inmate access to magazines, movies, books, and other common forms of media artifacts. This Article’s determinations stem from …