Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Astrachan And Easton: Fight Wikileaks Case In Court, Not In Cyberspace, James B. Astrachan, Eric Easton
Astrachan And Easton: Fight Wikileaks Case In Court, Not In Cyberspace, James B. Astrachan, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ub Viewpoint – Journalists May Face Contempt For Protecting Sources, Eric Easton
Ub Viewpoint – Journalists May Face Contempt For Protecting Sources, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Adjudicative Speech And The First Amendment, Christopher J. Peters
Adjudicative Speech And The First Amendment, Christopher J. Peters
All Faculty Scholarship
While political speech - speech intended to influence political decisions - is afforded the highest protection under the First Amendment, adjudicative speech - speech intended to influence court decisions - is regularly and systematically constrained by rules of evidence, canons of professional ethics, judicial gag orders, and similar devices. Yet court decisions can be as important, both to the litigants and to society at large, as political decisions. How then can our practice of severely constraining adjudicative speech be justified as consistent with First Amendment principles?
This Article attempts to answer that question in a way that is informative about …
Ub Viewpoint – Dissolving The Shadows, Eric Easton
Ub Viewpoint – Dissolving The Shadows, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Fight Muhammad's 'Secret' With Facts, Kenneth Lasson
Fight Muhammad's 'Secret' With Facts, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And Fcc Rule Making Under The 1992 Cable Act, Michael I. Meyerson
The First Amendment And Fcc Rule Making Under The 1992 Cable Act, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the First Amendment implications of the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC) regulations issued under the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 19921 (1992 Cable Act). The 1992 Cable Act imposes numerous requirements that are beyond the scope of this Article. This Article analyzes only the FCC's exercise of rule making discretion under the 1992 Cable Act.
Additionally, it must be remembered that an under-staffed FCC was given an enormous amount of work to do within fixed time limits. Therefore, it must be expected that the rulemaking would be vulnerable to second-guessing. Nonetheless, whenever a governmental entity …
Free Speech: It's Great For Hate, Kenneth Lasson
Free Speech: It's Great For Hate, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
This Gun For Hire: Dancing In The Dark Of The First Amendment, Michael I. Meyerson
This Gun For Hire: Dancing In The Dark Of The First Amendment, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
Classified advertisements in newspapers and magazines represent a uniquely democratic access to the media for the individual. Without having to pay the thousands of dollars for full-page advertisements, buyers and sellers can purchase space for their offers for only a few dollars, yet have them seen by city-wide or nation-wide audiences. Democracy, though, breeds its own excesses, and the legal question is always how to control that excess without harming the freedom.
As befits a medium open to all, classified advertisements run the gamut of human activity, from the sale of a used automobile to employment to lonely singles looking …
The First Amendment And The Cable Television Operator: An Unprotective Shield Against Public Access Requirements, Michael I. Meyerson
The First Amendment And The Cable Television Operator: An Unprotective Shield Against Public Access Requirements, Michael I. Meyerson
All Faculty Scholarship
This article focuses on the question of whether state-imposed public access requirements violate the First Amendment rights of the cable television operator. The author suggests that the appropriate analysis asks whether the law abridges expression the First Amendment was meant to protect. In other words, do cable access requirements abridge speech safeguarded by the First Amendment? The article demonstrates that such requirements do not hinder, but in fact further, fundamental First Amendment interests. Finally, the article shows that access requirements fulfill the standards of the constitutional tests for each classification into which they could be placed.