Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (9)
- First amendment (5)
- Free speech (5)
- Compelled speech (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
-
- Free Speech (3)
- Orthodoxy (3)
- Barnette (2)
- Civil rights (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Holmes (2)
- Law (2)
- Politics (2)
- Protest (2)
- Religion (2)
- Stanley Fish (2)
- 3D printed firearms (1)
- 3D printing (1)
- Academic freedom (1)
- Academic values (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Allegiance (1)
- Anti-SLAPP laws (1)
- Antiliberalism (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Black Rock City (1)
- Black Rock Rangers (1)
- Blasi (1)
- Body cameras (1)
- Brennan (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Law
Volo Foundation Lecture: Science, Free Speech, And Public Choice, Bret Stephens
Volo Foundation Lecture: Science, Free Speech, And Public Choice, Bret Stephens
FIU Law Review
In an era where science, free speech, and public choice clash, the historical unity between these pillars, as envisioned by America's founding fathers, is obscured. Examining Thomas Jefferson's reverence for Bacon, Locke, and Newton, reveals a past where reason and freedom intertwined. However, contemporary challenges, epitomized by the pandemic response, illustrate a divergence. Amidst censorship and expert dominance, the vital role of public scrutiny emerges. Acknowledging the fallibility of experts and embracing free speech as essential for reasoned discourse becomes imperative. To restore the balance, humility from scientific institutions, a renewed appreciation for free speech, and public courage are necessary …
Fiduciary Duty As A Shield For Social Media User Privacy And Platform Policing Of Political Misinformation And Disinformation, Michael M. Epstein
Fiduciary Duty As A Shield For Social Media User Privacy And Platform Policing Of Political Misinformation And Disinformation, Michael M. Epstein
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The “Liberty Of Silence” Challenging State Legislation That Strips Municipalities Of Authority To Remove Confederate Monuments, Roger C. Hartley
The “Liberty Of Silence” Challenging State Legislation That Strips Municipalities Of Authority To Remove Confederate Monuments, Roger C. Hartley
FIU Law Review
There are roughly 700 Confederate monuments still standing in courthouse lawns, parks, and downtown squares in virtually every city, town, and village throughout the “Old South.” Most of these Confederate monuments are located in states that have enacted legislation that bans the removal of Confederate monuments. Such legislative bans are in effect in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Legislation that bans removal of Confederate monuments from public spaces poses a racial justice issue for millions of residents in these states because it forces political majorities in Southern communities (many constituting majority-minority communities) to host a …
Attorney-Fee Shifting Is The Solution To Slapping Meritless Claims Out Of Federal Court, Gleisy Sopena
Attorney-Fee Shifting Is The Solution To Slapping Meritless Claims Out Of Federal Court, Gleisy Sopena
FIU Law Review
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (“SLAPPs”) are meritless claims brought against individuals or corporations to silence them for exercising protected speech under the First Amendment. In response to the chilling effects of these SLAPPsuits, State legislatures have enacted anti-SLAPP statutes to quickly dismiss these meritless claims and protect the targets of these suits. These anti-SLAPP statutes have two prominent components: a special motion to dismiss and an attorney fee-shifting provision that is dependent on prevailing on the special motion set forth in the statute. Federal courts sitting in diversity are divided over whether the special motion standards set forth in …
Fish On First, Larry Alexander
Dehors The Record: A Correction Of A Final Jeopardy Question, Thomas E. Baker
Dehors The Record: A Correction Of A Final Jeopardy Question, Thomas E. Baker
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Free Speech An Academic Value? Is Academic Freedom A Constitutional Value?, Daniel Gordon
Is Free Speech An Academic Value? Is Academic Freedom A Constitutional Value?, Daniel Gordon
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stanley Fish, The First, And The Life Of The Law, Samuel A. Terilli, Jr.
Stanley Fish, The First, And The Life Of The Law, Samuel A. Terilli, Jr.
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Professor Fish—Why Are You Still Picking On Liberalism?, Micah Schwartzman
Professor Fish—Why Are You Still Picking On Liberalism?, Micah Schwartzman
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transparency And The First, Mark Fenster
Sport And Expression, Sport As Expression, Howard M. Wasserman
Sport And Expression, Sport As Expression, Howard M. Wasserman
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Institutionalized Algorithmic Enforcement—The Pros And Cons Of The Eu Approach To Ugc Platform Liability, Martin Senftleben
Institutionalized Algorithmic Enforcement—The Pros And Cons Of The Eu Approach To Ugc Platform Liability, Martin Senftleben
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cracking The Code: Computer Code As Pure Speech And Its First Amendment Implications On The 3d Printed Firearms Controversy, Brian E. Heckmann
Cracking The Code: Computer Code As Pure Speech And Its First Amendment Implications On The 3d Printed Firearms Controversy, Brian E. Heckmann
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Will The Players Union Take An L Or Take A Knee?: The First Amendment Legal Issues Surrounding The Nfl National Anthem Controversy, Audriana Rodriguez
Will The Players Union Take An L Or Take A Knee?: The First Amendment Legal Issues Surrounding The Nfl National Anthem Controversy, Audriana Rodriguez
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Good Orthodoxy” And The Legacy Of Barnette, Erica Goldberg
“Good Orthodoxy” And The Legacy Of Barnette, Erica Goldberg
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not Such A Fixed Star After All: West Virginia State Board Of Education V. Barnette, And The Changing Meaning Of The First Amendment Right Not To Speak, Genevieve Lakier
Not Such A Fixed Star After All: West Virginia State Board Of Education V. Barnette, And The Changing Meaning Of The First Amendment Right Not To Speak, Genevieve Lakier
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Jackson In The Jehovah’S Witnesses’ Cases, John Q. Barrett
Justice Jackson In The Jehovah’S Witnesses’ Cases, John Q. Barrett
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Deconstitutionalizing Dewey, Aaron Saiger
Thoughts On Hayden C. Covington And The Paucity Of Litigation Scholarship, Ronald K.L. Collins
Thoughts On Hayden C. Covington And The Paucity Of Litigation Scholarship, Ronald K.L. Collins
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Close Reading Of Barnette, In Honor Of Vincent Blasi, Paul Horwitz
A Close Reading Of Barnette, In Honor Of Vincent Blasi, Paul Horwitz
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Barnette And Masterpiece Cakeshop: Some Unanswered Questions, Abner S. Greene
Barnette And Masterpiece Cakeshop: Some Unanswered Questions, Abner S. Greene
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
“Fixed Star” Or Twin Star?: The Ambiguity Of Barnette, Steven D. Smith
“Fixed Star” Or Twin Star?: The Ambiguity Of Barnette, Steven D. Smith
FIU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Police Misconduct, Video Recording, And Procedural Barriers To Rights Enforcement, Howard M. Wasserman
Police Misconduct, Video Recording, And Procedural Barriers To Rights Enforcement, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
The story of police reform and of "policing the police" has become the story of video and video evidence, and "record everything to know the truth" has become the singular mantra. Video, both police-created and citizen-created, has become the singular tool for ensuring police accountability, reforming law enforcement, and enforcing the rights of victims of police misconduct. This Article explores procedural problems surrounding the use of video recording and video evidence to counter police misconduct, hold individual officers and governments accountable, and reform departmental policies, regulations, and practices. It considers four issues: 1) the mistaken belief that video can "speak …
Holmes And Brennan, Howard Wasserman
Holmes And Brennan, Howard Wasserman
Faculty Publications
This article jointly examines two legal biographies of two landmark First Amendment decisions and the justices who produced them. In The Great Dissent (Henry Holt and Co. 2013), Thomas Healy explores Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissent in Abrams v. United States (1919), which arguably laid the cornerstone for modern American free speech jurisprudence. In The Progeny (ABA 2014), Stephen Wermiel and Lee Levine explore William J. Brennan’s majority opinion in New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) and the development and evolution of its progeny over Brennan’s remaining twenty-five years on the Court. The article then explores three ideas: 1) the connections …
Law, Religion, And Politics: Understanding The Separation Of Church And State, Richard Garnett
Law, Religion, And Politics: Understanding The Separation Of Church And State, Richard Garnett
Faculty Workshops
Professor Richard Garnett, of University of Notre Dame Law School, presented on the topic Law, Religion, and Politics: Understanding the Separation of Church and State. This workshop was presented as part of the Hesburgh Lecture Series through the Alumni & Friends of University of Notre Dame and was co-sponsored by the Notre Dame Alumni Club of Miami. This workshop examined how to understand the Constitution's "separation of church and state" and what it requires of religious believers and institutions.
Dusty Order: Law Enforcement And Participant Cooperation At Burning Man, Manuel A. Gomez
Dusty Order: Law Enforcement And Participant Cooperation At Burning Man, Manuel A. Gomez
Faculty Books
Media depictions of Burning Man focus on the picturesque and eccentric appearance of the weeklong affair. The event is sometimes misportrayed as a lawless environment where participants are encouraged to engage in rowdy behavior. Most carnivalesque events offer an escape from reality and are generally thought to enable unruly conduct. Despite stereotypes, Burning Man is a different beast. Not only is the crime rate in Black Rock City lower than any other city of comparable size, but Burners show a high level of cooperative and law abiding behavior that helps maintain the social order without depending on official means of …
A Jurisdictional Perspective On New York Times V. Sullivan, Howard M. Wasserman
A Jurisdictional Perspective On New York Times V. Sullivan, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
New York Times v. Sullivan, arguably the Supreme Court's most significant First Amendment decision, marks its fiftieth anniversary next year. Often overlooked in discussions of the case's impact on the freedom of speech and freedom of the press is that it arose from a complex puzzle of constitutional, statutory, and judge-made jurisdictional and procedural rules. These kept the case in hostile Alabama state courts for four years and a half-million-dollar judgment before the Times and its civil rights leader co-defendants finally could avail themselves of the structural protections of federal court and Article III judges. The case's outcome and …
Bartnicki As Lochner: Some Thoughts On First Amendment Lochnerism, Howard M. Wasserman
Bartnicki As Lochner: Some Thoughts On First Amendment Lochnerism, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Cheers, Profanity, And Free Speech, Howard M. Wasserman
Cheers, Profanity, And Free Speech, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Controlling Corporate Speech: Is Regulation Fair Disclosure Unconstitutional, Antony Page, Katy H. Yang
Controlling Corporate Speech: Is Regulation Fair Disclosure Unconstitutional, Antony Page, Katy H. Yang
Faculty Publications
We analyze whether Regulation Fair Disclosure, SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt's crowning achievement, violates the First Amendment. Regulation FD requires that a company that discloses material non-public information to certain private audiences must also make that information public, subject to certain safe-harbors. The Regulation solely targets speech, acting either to compel it to a public audience or as a burden on private disclosure. Part I examines the reach of Regulation FD, the enforcement actions to date, and currently available empirical data. Part II provides an introduction to the interaction of the First Amendment and SEC regulations affecting speech. Part III broadens …