Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 16 of 16
Full-Text Articles in Law
Symposium On The Miller Commission On Matrimonial Law: Editor's Overview, Janet A. Johnson
Symposium On The Miller Commission On Matrimonial Law: Editor's Overview, Janet A. Johnson
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pace Law Review Symposium: New York Matrimonial Commission - Introduction, Judith S. Kaye
Pace Law Review Symposium: New York Matrimonial Commission - Introduction, Judith S. Kaye
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Commission's Process And Recommendations, Sondra Miller
The Commission's Process And Recommendations, Sondra Miller
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Addicted To Fault: Why Divorce Reform Has Lagged In New York, J. Herbie Difonzo, Ruth C. Stern
Addicted To Fault: Why Divorce Reform Has Lagged In New York, J. Herbie Difonzo, Ruth C. Stern
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Abandoned: Forty Years Of Stalemate In Actions For Divorce On The Ground Of Abandonment, Dolores Gebhardt, Sondra Miller
Justice Abandoned: Forty Years Of Stalemate In Actions For Divorce On The Ground Of Abandonment, Dolores Gebhardt, Sondra Miller
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kramer Vs. Kramer Revisited: A Comment On The Miller Commission Report And The Obligation Of Divorce Lawyers For Parents To Discuss Alternative Dispute Resolution With Their Clients, Andrew Schepard
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Hand That Rocks The Cradle: Maternal Gatekeeping After Divorce, Marsha Kline Pruett, Lauren A. Arthur, Rachel Ebling
The Hand That Rocks The Cradle: Maternal Gatekeeping After Divorce, Marsha Kline Pruett, Lauren A. Arthur, Rachel Ebling
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Law Guardian By The Same Name: A Response To Professor Guggenheim's Matrimonial Commission Critique, Merril Sobie
A Law Guardian By The Same Name: A Response To Professor Guggenheim's Matrimonial Commission Critique, Merril Sobie
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reforming Divorce: What's Needed And What's Not, Marsha Garrison
Reforming Divorce: What's Needed And What's Not, Marsha Garrison
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
O'Brien V. O'Brien: A Failed Reform, Unlikely Reformers, Ira Mark Ellman
O'Brien V. O'Brien: A Failed Reform, Unlikely Reformers, Ira Mark Ellman
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appendix A: Matrimonial Commission Of The State Of New York, Report To The Chief Judge Of The State Of New York , Sondra Miller
Appendix A: Matrimonial Commission Of The State Of New York, Report To The Chief Judge Of The State Of New York , Sondra Miller
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On The Miller Commission Report: A California Perspective, Leonard Edwards
Comments On The Miller Commission Report: A California Perspective, Leonard Edwards
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Triaging Family Court Services: The Connecticut Judicial Branch's Family Civil Intake Screen, Peter Salem, Debra Kulak, Robin M. Deutsch
Triaging Family Court Services: The Connecticut Judicial Branch's Family Civil Intake Screen, Peter Salem, Debra Kulak, Robin M. Deutsch
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Law Guardian By Any Other Name: A Critique Of The Report Of The Matrimonial Commission, Martin Guggenheim
A Law Guardian By Any Other Name: A Critique Of The Report Of The Matrimonial Commission, Martin Guggenheim
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
Client-Directed Lawyers For Children: It Is The Right Thing To Do?, Linda D. Elrod
Client-Directed Lawyers For Children: It Is The Right Thing To Do?, Linda D. Elrod
Pace Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Law Guardian By The Same Name: A Response To Professor Guggenheim's Matrimonial Commission Critique, Merril Sobie
A Law Guardian By The Same Name: A Response To Professor Guggenheim's Matrimonial Commission Critique, Merril Sobie
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
I commence this article with a discussion of the statutory provisions governing the appointment and responsibilities of attorneys who represent children in New York. Part II briefly outlines the chronological implementation from initial enactment through the Matrimonial Commission Report, a period spanning forty-five years. Parts III and IV explore the specific nature of child custody representation and the relationship between the attorney and the child client during the course of a frequently lengthy proceeding. Last, the Commission's conclusions and recommendations are critiqued in Parts V and VI.