Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 6 of 6

Full-Text Articles in Law

Child Sex Abuse Victims: How Will Their Stories Be Heard After Crawford V. Washington?, Erin Thompson Apr 2005

Child Sex Abuse Victims: How Will Their Stories Be Heard After Crawford V. Washington?, Erin Thompson

Campbell Law Review

This comment focuses on the Confrontation Clause's interpretation throughout history and demonstrates the adverse effects the current state of the law has on child sex abuse victims like Alice and Bonnie. As such, the United States Supreme Court should declare that current statutory protections for child sex abuse victims are valid exceptions to the Confrontation Clause. Additionally, states should be encouraged to establish these statutes where they do not exist.


Confrontation Clause Jan 1991

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Confrontation Clause Jan 1991

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Confrontation Clause Jan 1991

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Confrontation Clause Jan 1991

Confrontation Clause

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank Jan 1984

Confronting Child Victims Of Sex Abuse: The Unconstitutionality Of The Sexual Abuse Hearsay Exception, Katrin E. Frank

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment first analyzes Washington’s hearsay exception Act in the light of the principles that form the basis for the hearsay rule and its exceptions. It then examines the effect of the Act on the preexisting hearsay rules. Next, it compares the concept of unavailability as used in the hearsay exceptions with the concept of incompetence; both concepts are then analyzed according to the requirements of the hearsay rules and the confrontation clause. The Comment concludes that the Act is unconstitutional because it permits admission of hearsay of testimonially incompetent children.