Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- McNabb v. United States (2)
- Admissibility (1)
- Arenson v. Skouras Theatres Corporation (1)
- Arraignment (1)
- Arrest (1)
-
- Attorneys (1)
- Automobiles (1)
- Beliveau v. Beliveau (1)
- Birth date (1)
- Broadwater-Mo. Water Users' Assn. v. Montana Power Co. (1)
- Co-prosecutors (1)
- Code of Criminal Procedure (1)
- Compulsion (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Crane v. Smith (1)
- Crites Inc. v. Prudential (1)
- Dying declarations (1)
- Feldman v. United States (1)
- German law (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- Hospital treatment (1)
- Hull v. Plume (1)
- Identification (1)
- In re Mathew's Estate (1)
- In re Zalewski's Estate (1)
- Indianapolis Life Ins. Co. v. Lundquist (1)
- Insurance Co. of America (1)
- Involuntary confessions (1)
- Judgments (1)
- Klopot v. Northrop (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer
Abstracts, Mary Jane Plumer
Michigan Law Review
The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.
Evidence - Admissibility Of Age In Hospital Record As Business Entry, Craig E. Davids
Evidence - Admissibility Of Age In Hospital Record As Business Entry, Craig E. Davids
Michigan Law Review
Representing his birth date as 1866, deceased purchased from defendant insurance company in 1921 a policy on his life, which provided that in the event of any misrepresentation of age the insured's beneficiary would receive only that amount which a standard policy issued at his true age would stipulate for the premiums paid. In a suit by the beneficiary to recover on the policy, defendant attempted to prove that deceased was born at least as early as 1862. Among other evidence, defendant introduced a hospital record of deceased's visit to a particular institution in 1936 where he represented his age …
Criminal Justice In Germany: Ii, Hans Julius Wolff
Criminal Justice In Germany: Ii, Hans Julius Wolff
Michigan Law Review
The trial (Hauptverhandlung) is the main and central part of the whole criminal proceeding. All that is brought forward in the trial and only what is brought forward there can furnish the basis for the verdict. Whatever has preceded the trial proper becomes irrelevant as soon as the trial is opened.
The principles governing the trial are publicity, orality, immediateness, and concentration.
Evidence-Police Regulation By Rules Of Evidence-Results Of The Mcnabb Case, John B. Waite
Evidence-Police Regulation By Rules Of Evidence-Results Of The Mcnabb Case, John B. Waite
Michigan Law Review
In McNabb v. United States the Supreme Court promulgated novel judicial legislation, the gist of which is that confessions or admissions of crime made while the accused is in custody without having been brought before a magistrate as required by law are inadmissible in evidence. That judicial pronouncement assumed that the utterances were made without compulsion, and prohibited their use solely because at the time they were made the officers of justice were themselves disregarding the law-the procedural requirement that persons arrested be taken immediately before a magistrate. In Justice Frankfurter's phrase, "a conviction resting on evidence secured through such …
Evidence-Police Regulation By Rules Of Evidence, John Barker Waite
Evidence-Police Regulation By Rules Of Evidence, John Barker Waite
Michigan Law Review
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, "were never meant to be an indirect process of punishment." Yet twice the Supreme Court has promulgated new rules of evidence for precisely that purpose. The rule that evidence is inadmissible, regardless of its relevance and materiality, if it was obtained by unreasonable search was first suggested by Justice Bradley, who wrote the majority opinion in Boyd v. United States in 1886. The other rule was voiced in 1943 by Justice Frankfurter, writing the majority opinion in McNabb v. United States. And each rule demonstrates the inherent evil of judicial …
Abstracts, Benjamin M. Quigg, Jr.
Abstracts, Benjamin M. Quigg, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
The abstracts consist merely of summaries of the facts and holdings of recent cases and are distinguished from the notes by the absence of discussion.
Bar Briefs; Errata, Anon
Bar Briefs; Errata, Anon
Washington Law Review
Contains news of local bar associations, law firms and lawyers and missing text from Judson Falknor's article on the American Law Institute's Model Code of Evidence, published in the November 1943 journal.
The Rule Of Dying Declarations, Leo E. Oxley
The Rule Of Dying Declarations, Leo E. Oxley
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.