Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson
Experts As Hearsay Conduits: Confrontation Abuses In Opinion Testimony, Ronald L. Carlson
Scholarly Works
The dispute over whether litigants may use experts to run unexamined hearsay into the trial record is a microcosm of a larger debate. The larger question is whether judicial review of expert testimony should be passive, or whether the expert witness process should be marked by active judicial policing. Does the plethora of expert opinions presently being offered in modern trials merit special scrutiny by the courts?
Some scholars urge that courts must accommodate experts. Proponents of this view favor few challenges to the unrestricted rendition of opinions by an expert, whether the expert is real or self-proclaimed. Under this …
Book Review Of Litigation Services Directory, James S. Heller
Book Review Of Litigation Services Directory, James S. Heller
Library Staff Publications
No abstract provided.
Biased Evidence Rules: A Framework For Judicial Analysis And Reform, Randolph N. Jonakait
Biased Evidence Rules: A Framework For Judicial Analysis And Reform, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Making The Law Of Factual Determinations Matter More, Randolph N. Jonakait
Making The Law Of Factual Determinations Matter More, Randolph N. Jonakait
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
"Other Acts” & Character Evidence: Part Ii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.