Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adjudicatory trenches (1)
- Admissibility of Expert Testimony (1)
- Affirmative consent (1)
- Appropriate survey universe (1)
- Atkins v. Virginia (1)
-
- Bright line cut-off rule (1)
- Capital Jury Project (1)
- Capital sentencing (1)
- Complainant’s head (1)
- Consumer confusion survey evidence (1)
- Costco (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Drinking & thinking (1)
- Erroneous execution standard (1)
- Expert witness (1)
- False charges (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Hall v. Florida (1)
- IQ (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Intellectual disability (1)
- Jurors (1)
- Keystone (1)
- Mental retardation (1)
- Methodology (1)
- Mitigating evidence (1)
- Polaroid test (1)
- Premature decision making (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Why Not Believe Women In Sexual Assault Cases?: An Engagement With Professors Tuerkheimer, Colb, And Many Others, Dan Subotnik
Why Not Believe Women In Sexual Assault Cases?: An Engagement With Professors Tuerkheimer, Colb, And Many Others, Dan Subotnik
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Whether The Bright-Line Cut-Off Rule And The Adversarial Expert Explanation Of Adaptive Functioning Exacerbates Capital Juror Comprehension Of The Intellectual Disability, Leona Deborah Jochnowitz
Whether The Bright-Line Cut-Off Rule And The Adversarial Expert Explanation Of Adaptive Functioning Exacerbates Capital Juror Comprehension Of The Intellectual Disability, Leona Deborah Jochnowitz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Diamonds In The Rough: A Review Of Tiffany V. Costco And A Call To Apply Daubert To The Admissibility Of Consumer Survey Evidence In Trademark Infringement Litigation, Michael J. Borger
Diamonds In The Rough: A Review Of Tiffany V. Costco And A Call To Apply Daubert To The Admissibility Of Consumer Survey Evidence In Trademark Infringement Litigation, Michael J. Borger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.