Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Self Incrimination (3)
- Confessions (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Miranda Rule (2)
-
- Administration of Criminal Justice (1)
- Criminal Conspiracy (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Involuntary Confessions (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 436 (1966)) (1)
- Privileges and Immunities (1)
- Suppression of Evidence (1)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 5th Amendment (1)
- United States Constitution 6th Amendment (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus
The Supreme Court And The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: Has The Burger Court Retreated?, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
The Exclusion Of Evidence In The United States, Paul Marcus
The Exclusion Of Evidence In The United States, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
Restrictions On Law Enforcement Investigation And Prosecution Of Crime, Paul Marcus
Restrictions On Law Enforcement Investigation And Prosecution Of Crime, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
It's Not Just About Miranda: Determining The Voluntariness Of Confessions In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul Marcus
It's Not Just About Miranda: Determining The Voluntariness Of Confessions In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
No abstract provided.
Defending Miranda, Paul Marcus
Co-Conspirator Declarations: The Federal Rules Of Evidence And Other Recent Developments, From A Criminal Law Perspective, Paul Marcus
Paul Marcus
Perhaps the most important advantage available to a prosecutor in a criminal conspiracy case is the exception to the hearsay rule for co-conspirator declarations. The exception is widely used and is often a significant part of the government presentation. In essence, it provides that otherwise inadmissible hearsay declarations of coconspirators are admissible at trial against the defendant so long as they were made during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. The exception typically arises when an alleged co-conspirator declarant tells the witness (often an undercover police officer) all about the conspiracy, perhaps in the hope of attracting a …