Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accident (1)
- Bankruptcy Act (1)
- Blood sample (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Communications Act of 1934 (1)
-
- Criminal prosecution (1)
- Custodian (1)
- Depositions (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Documents (1)
- Expert (1)
- Fatal (1)
- Goldman v. United States (1)
- Hearsay (1)
- In re Cooper (1)
- Insurance policy (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Intoxication (1)
- Iowa (1)
- New Jersey (1)
- New York (1)
- Office (1)
- Reed v. Order of United Cdmmercial Travelers (1)
- Requests for admission (1)
- Self incrimination (1)
- Silence (1)
- State v. Benson (1)
- Subpoena (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Tresspass (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Instruments Of Discovery Under Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Alexander Holtzoff
Instruments Of Discovery Under Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Alexander Holtzoff
Michigan Law Review
The elimination of the "sporting theory" of justice, the simplification of procedure, and the prompt disposition of controversies on their merits are the great objectives of the new federal civil practice. One of the principal means for the attainment of these purposes is discovery, by which a disclosure may be obtained in respect to all pertinent information in the possession of any party to a litigation. An exception is, of course, made for privileged matter. It is one of the basic theories of the new procedure that every party to a law suit is under a duty to reveal to …
Evidence - Constitutional Problems In Compelling The Attendance Of Witnesses Outside The State, Paul J. Keller, Jr.
Evidence - Constitutional Problems In Compelling The Attendance Of Witnesses Outside The State, Paul J. Keller, Jr.
Michigan Law Review
Cooper, a citizen of New Jersey, was sought as a witness by a defendant in a criminal prosecution in a New York court in accordance with a New Jersey statute, which allowed such a procedure upon certain conditions. The conditions included a hearing in New Jersey on the summons and provisions for compensation and immunity from service of process while acting on the writ outside the state. At the New Jersey hearing on the summons Cooper objected on the ground that the statute was an unconstitutional deprivation of his liberty. Held, that the statute is constitutional. In re Cooper …
Evidence - Admissibility Of Evidence Gained By Use Of Detectaphone, Michigan Law Review
Evidence - Admissibility Of Evidence Gained By Use Of Detectaphone, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Appellant was indicted for conspiracy to violate the Bankruptcy Act. An agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation was permitted by the custodian of the building to enter appellant's office without his knowledge, and to install a dictaphone connecting with an adjoining room. However, the dictaphone failed to operate, and the only evidence which the agents were able to get was by means of a detectaphone which was in the same room with the agents, and which was not connected with the dictaphone. Held, the detectaphone recordings were admissible in evidence because no trespass was committed in getting the …
Evidence - Admissibility Of Hospital Records As Business Entries, Robert C. Lovejoy
Evidence - Admissibility Of Hospital Records As Business Entries, Robert C. Lovejoy
Michigan Law Review
As a defense to a suit on an insurance policy, the defendant insurer claimed that the plaintiff was intoxicated at the time of the fatal accident. Defendant offered in evidence a portion of the case record of the hospital to which plaintiff was taken after the accident, the record stating that he was "apparently well under influence of alcohol." Although it was duly authenticated under the federal statute permitting business entries to be used as evidence, this evidence was excluded by the trial court as being an observation rather than a diagnosis. Held, reversed. There was no basis for …
Evidence - Admissibility Of Defendants Refusal To Submit To A Blood Test For Intoxication, David Davidoff
Evidence - Admissibility Of Defendants Refusal To Submit To A Blood Test For Intoxication, David Davidoff
Michigan Law Review
Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. This appeal was based on the contention that the testimony by a deputy sheriff of defendant's refusal to submit to a blood test to determine whether or not he was intoxicated violated his privilege against self-incrimination and was inadmissible. Held, the evidence was properly admitted. State v. Benson, (Iowa, 1941) 300 N. W. 275.